02.04.2013 Views

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Others have given summaries <strong>of</strong> the immense influence <strong>of</strong> Freud and Jung on <strong>art</strong><br />

evaluation 21 , both need no introduction here. Freud never used drawings in his work, but<br />

his model <strong>of</strong> the <strong>art</strong>ist as a borderline psychiatric case became the public view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

'unconscious made visible' <strong>of</strong> the <strong>art</strong>ist's work. Freud's deconstruction <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong><br />

Leonardo and Michelangelo 22 was probably his influential contribution to the technique<br />

<strong>of</strong> interpretation 23 . Jung painted and sculpted and encouraged his patients to do the same<br />

"in order to escape the censure <strong>of</strong> the unconscious mind" 24 . He rejected Freud's negative<br />

view <strong>of</strong> phantasy as a source <strong>of</strong> unconscious or as sublimations <strong>of</strong> infantile conflicts. He<br />

made a distinction between personal and collective unconscious, and based his<br />

interpretations and assumptions concerning archetypes 25 and universal symbols 26 on a<br />

21<br />

MacGregor (1989) op.cit., pp.245-270 gives a perspective <strong>of</strong> Freud and Jung's limited involvement in<br />

true psychotic <strong>art</strong> and the development <strong>of</strong> method and theory from Kris; Joy Schaverien (1992) op.cit.,<br />

takes p<strong>art</strong>icular aspects from psychoanalysis to develop her own methods for <strong>art</strong> therapy and evaluation,<br />

but gives a very clear explanation <strong>of</strong> transference and counter transference; Ellenberger (1970) op.cit.,<br />

shows the development from the theories <strong>of</strong> Freud to today's 'dynamic psychiatry'; Waller (1991) op.cit.,<br />

presents a perspective <strong>of</strong> the synthesis <strong>of</strong> methods in psychoanalysis for<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>art</strong> in therapy in Britain from 1940, and Maxine Borrowsky Junge and Paige Pateracki<br />

Asawa (1994), A History <strong>of</strong> Art <strong>The</strong>rapy in the United States , Mundelein: Am. Art <strong>The</strong>rapy Assn., review<br />

the <strong>art</strong> therapy literature which summarises the contributions <strong>of</strong> first and second generation <strong>art</strong> therapists<br />

in America but is generally less theoretically orientated. For a more in-depth analysis <strong>of</strong> psychoanalytic<br />

methods in <strong>art</strong>, E. Kris (1964), Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art , New York: Intl. U. P., and R.<br />

Wollheim (1964), Art and its Objects Cambridge (reprint 1980): Writers Readers, probably give the most<br />

understandable explanations. Books on <strong>art</strong> therapy generally are too simplistic and use a synthesis <strong>of</strong><br />

different methods with no overall context.<br />

22<br />

Laurie Schneider Adams (1993) Art and Psychoanalysis , New York: Harper Collins gives a perspective<br />

on Sigmund Freud (1910), Leonardo Da Vinci - a memory <strong>of</strong> his childhood, Art and Literature, Pelican<br />

Freud Library , V.XIV, Harmondsworth: Penguin, mostly derived from his childhood memories and<br />

speculations on the infancy <strong>of</strong> Leonardo. It was in <strong>The</strong> Moses <strong>of</strong> Michelangelo, ibid., (1914) that he<br />

explored expression in the <strong>art</strong>work.<br />

23 But he made a number <strong>of</strong> assumptions based on faulty translation <strong>of</strong> Italian histories.<br />

24<br />

C.G. Jung and R. Wilhelm (1931), <strong>The</strong> Secret <strong>of</strong> the Golden Flower , London: Macmillan, p.94;<br />

Schaverien (1992), op.cit., gives a good description <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> the 'unconscious' and its application<br />

to modern day <strong>art</strong> therapy pp.22-25.<br />

25<br />

Archetypes in <strong>art</strong>; inherited unconscious images that are component p<strong>art</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the 'collective unconscious'<br />

shared by all.<br />

26 Universal symbol: a symbol that is assumed to represent the same referent universally. Such symbols<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!