The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Reliability <strong>Study</strong> Chapter 4 - Methods. Tables and Plots 1-15. Tables 1-15 by variable showing: column 1, Raw data scores for each variable each rater( r1-7) over 7 pictures in sequence. Column 2, scoring differences between 6 raters and author on 7 rated pictures. Column 3, mean differences for raters 1-6 and standard difference to rater 7 (author). Plots 1-15 by variable showing individual rater differences around average rating <strong>of</strong> 6 independent raters and author. 366
Tables showing mean differences between 6 raters and author on 7 rated pictures. Raters R1-7 score for RED, pics 1-7 - R7 = author* R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 9 9 8 5 6 9 10 15 12 12 8 11 14 5 7 5 5 5 7 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 11 11 11 12 11 9 10 Total Total % agreement exact (x); ±1 point (1); ±2 points (2) x 1 2 6 6 2 1 0 1 2 0 6 5 5 1 ---------- 24 9 2 57 21 5 mean for raters 1-6 and difference to R7 ratings mean diff. R1-6 R7 .00 .00 6.00 .00 7.00 2.00 11.33 2.67 5.67 .33 .83 -.83 10.83 -.83 1. Difference in mean interrater score/author score for RED (RATS - A) plotted against average (RATS + A)/2. ________________________________________ d 4_ _ i _ _ f _ 1 _ f _ 1 _ e _ _ r 0_1__________2___________________________ e _ 1 1 _ n _ _ c _ _ e _ _ -4_ _ R-A ________________________________________ 0 5 10 15 20 Average 6 rats + author Raters R1-7 score for YELLOW pics 1-7 - R7 = author* R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7* 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 4 5 3 5 5 3 5 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 16 14 13 16 16 17 16 13 13 10 13 13 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 10 11 8 9 12 Total Total % agreement exact (x); ±1 point (1); ±2 points (2) x 1 2 5 4 2 5 1 3 1 1 5 6 0 1 2 ----------- 28 5 3 67 12 7 mean for raters 1-6 and difference to R7 ratings. mean diff. R1-6 R7 5.50 -.50 4.17 .83 5.83 .17 15.33 .67 12.50 .50 .00 .00 9.33 2.67 fig 2. Difference in mean interrater score/author score for YELLOW (RATS - A) plotted against average (RATS + A)/2. ________________________________________ d 4_ _ i _ _ f _ 1 _ f _ _ e _ 1 1 1 _ r 0_1__________1___________________________ e _ 1 _ n _ _ c _ _ e _ _ -4_ _ R-A ________________________________________ 0 5 10 15 20 Average 6 rats + author 367
Page 1:
The psychopathology of everyday art
Page 4 and 5:
Table of Contents Page Number Chapt
Page 6 and 7:
List of Illustrations, Figures and
Page 8 and 9:
quality. 113 Table 5: Reliability s
Page 10 and 11:
Table, boxplot and spreadplot 1e (b
Page 12 and 13:
Table 19: Correlation for DAPA vari
Page 14 and 15:
Acknowledgements, thanks and forewo
Page 16 and 17:
concludes on the effectiveness of t
Page 18 and 19:
or drawing progresses, relationship
Page 20 and 21:
The link between genius as a produc
Page 22 and 23:
again by a multidisciplinary team w
Page 24 and 25:
theoretical foundation relating art
Page 26 and 27:
the content of which was seemingly
Page 28 and 29:
approach. Some of the major critici
Page 30 and 31:
Gestalt Analysis Rudolph Arnheim ha
Page 32 and 33:
molar level and not by individual e
Page 34 and 35:
Attempts to lists characteristics o
Page 36 and 37:
tests are still popular in assessme
Page 38 and 39:
investigation of artwork, but few h
Page 40 and 41:
expressions of a disordered psyche.
Page 42 and 43:
own paintings, or on interpretation
Page 44 and 45:
pointing to integrative or global j
Page 46 and 47:
Chapter Two: Review of the recent l
Page 48 and 49:
etrieved from the Psychlit, which p
Page 50 and 51:
a major proportion of the study mat
Page 52 and 53:
psychopathology, something which is
Page 54 and 55:
3 13 5 5 5 1 3 2 10 0 0 2 11 0 0 3
Page 56 and 57:
social/developmental energy theorie
Page 58 and 59:
advanced from all types of papers b
Page 60 and 61:
Art therapists begin their career f
Page 62 and 63:
talent and therefore do not fit in
Page 64 and 65:
2. Research studies There were two
Page 66 and 67:
Method of study or description of t
Page 68 and 69:
olds and only 2 with over 60s. The
Page 70 and 71:
form of this expression and how it
Page 72 and 73:
Content: 16 studies reported change
Page 74 and 75:
Pictures by bipolar depressives sho
Page 76 and 77:
This section does not deal strictly
Page 78 and 79:
correlation of art elements with de
Page 80 and 81:
of form 154 . The formal elements w
Page 82 and 83:
ecognise and work through the situa
Page 84 and 85:
Conclusion The use of art was not i
Page 86 and 87:
Thematic interpretation varied with
Page 88 and 89:
(2) to find out how the art relates
Page 90 and 91:
There were 7 demographic variables:
Page 92 and 93:
No. 1 judges 2 3 4 60 No. 2 Study 3
Page 94 and 95:
satisfactory classification as it i
Page 96 and 97:
or non-art tests which were not see
Page 98 and 99:
favoured (12% n=6) over post measur
Page 100 and 101:
procedures, or publishing bias, sin
Page 102 and 103:
Table 8b. Analysis of variance perf
Page 104 and 105:
spread between subjective and objec
Page 106 and 107:
are linked to those artistic charac
Page 108 and 109:
3 Demographic variables were used f
Page 110 and 111:
Table 2. Diagnostic groups for 70 s
Page 112 and 113:
However, there were few tests which
Page 114 and 115:
include recognisable or identifiabl
Page 116 and 117:
and emotional indicators in drawing
Page 118 and 119:
The DDS (1988) study was an explora
Page 120 and 121:
which were not significant - and I
Page 122 and 123:
eliability studies or studies which
Page 124 and 125:
Thematic variables Table 1: reliabi
Page 126 and 127:
etween grades of the same diagnosis
Page 128 and 129:
personally expressive images than '
Page 130 and 131:
to trees (52); size of figure (75);
Page 132 and 133:
Table 4: reliability statistics and
Page 134 and 135:
Line Table 5: reliability statistic
Page 136 and 137:
Purpose or use of line contained on
Page 138 and 139:
Shape variables (study no.) (o) obj
Page 140 and 141:
Colour Table 7: reliability statist
Page 142 and 143:
number of colours. Furthermore with
Page 144 and 145:
subcategories were congruous and al
Page 146 and 147:
(35, 46, 36, 38, 33); and indicator
Page 148 and 149:
Summary: There are unresolved defin
Page 150 and 151:
Summary: The effect which distingui
Page 152 and 153:
Summary: Striking variation in glob
Page 154 and 155:
Reliability: Perseveration is a non
Page 156 and 157:
(including schizophrenics) against
Page 158 and 159:
The studies are difficult to sum up
Page 160 and 161:
indicate greater agreement (even th
Page 162 and 163:
Two weaknesses lie in the simple ca
Page 164 and 165:
of drawing areas and to quantify wh
Page 166 and 167:
Is Meta Analysis appropriate for th
Page 168 and 169:
techniques which compensate for unr
Page 170 and 171:
drawing evaluation with comments fr
Page 172 and 173:
There are few answers to this criti
Page 174 and 175:
attention to overall effect sizes t
Page 176 and 177:
The 'File Drawer Problem' (refer ba
Page 178 and 179:
Table 2. All variables for 11 studi
Page 180 and 181:
Less than a third of the drawing ar
Page 182 and 183:
Case study and controlled research
Page 184 and 185:
potential for psychiatric populatio
Page 186 and 187:
only are discussed (indicators whic
Page 188 and 189:
specific areas of positivity could
Page 190 and 191:
Rating Guide (Hacking & Foreman 199
Page 192 and 193:
Table 2: Summary table of expected
Page 194 and 195:
Previous methods of assessing atomi
Page 196 and 197:
cases as to whether informed consen
Page 198 and 199:
It was decided to use a large mixed
Page 200 and 201:
paintings was not reliable enough t
Page 202 and 203:
computed on any of these levels. Gr
Page 204 and 205:
The DAPA (Descriptive Assessment fo
Page 206 and 207:
The extremes of the distribution fo
Page 208 and 209:
The difficulty with using t-tests i
Page 210 and 211:
addition it leaves out other variab
Page 212 and 213:
nebulous for reasonable conclusions
Page 214 and 215:
identified were included in the stu
Page 216 and 217:
DISCUSSION • The validity of the
Page 218 and 219:
and the test used terminology which
Page 220 and 221:
How the data were structured Althou
Page 222 and 223:
How well does the method agree? Tab
Page 224 and 225:
- 76% - of the scales were rated wi
Page 226 and 227:
Green Blue Brown White Black Intens
Page 228 and 229:
All of the scales were understood b
Page 230 and 231:
Table 1: Demographics for experimen
Page 232 and 233:
classify, even as in and out patien
Page 234 and 235:
score for each subject was a ratio
Page 236 and 237:
each participant received the same
Page 238 and 239:
Results Interaction effects: The me
Page 240 and 241:
was no evidence of impoverishment f
Page 242 and 243:
Chapter 5. Results This chapter pre
Page 244 and 245:
appendix 2) and these were left in
Page 246 and 247:
fairly small, less than 0.1, indica
Page 248 and 249:
Red, Green, Black, Drawn Line, Emot
Page 250 and 251:
1. Neither schizophrenics nor depre
Page 252 and 253:
schizophrenia was indistinguishable
Page 254 and 255:
Black: Black is the darkest colour
Page 256 and 257:
the other groups since no confidenc
Page 258 and 259:
Drawn line: The normal distribution
Page 260 and 261:
proportions of empty space in the p
Page 262 and 263:
1. Depressives showed significantly
Page 264 and 265:
function contributed significantly
Page 266 and 267:
the discriminant analysis. It will
Page 268 and 269:
Subordinate Analyses Interaction ef
Page 270 and 271:
Table 15: showing correlations betw
Page 272 and 273:
2. Intensity showed a correlation o
Page 274 and 275:
quality and reliability of their me
Page 276 and 277:
as being unreliable, would be metho
Page 278 and 279:
There would be a correlation betwee
Page 280 and 281:
Figures 3. Map of Associations betw
Page 282 and 283:
Schizophrenic pictures showed corre
Page 284 and 285:
The DAPA results for depression are
Page 286 and 287:
abusers 308 , but not the schizophr
Page 288 and 289:
Control pictures showed the only as
Page 290 and 291:
yellow Structural variables Figures
Page 292 and 293:
directly, to answer this question.
Page 294 and 295:
yellow and green, its removal would
Page 296 and 297:
Schizophrenics used little colour e
Page 298 and 299:
directly to the environment; assess
Page 300 and 301:
influence on apparent negativity. W
Page 302 and 303:
ather than for schizophrenia 335 .
Page 304 and 305:
Supporting this point, the focus ar
Page 306 and 307:
Several kinds of difficulties were
Page 308 and 309:
portraiture, so it is difficult to
Page 310 and 311:
1, as generally the scores for schi
Page 312 and 313:
numbers resulted in differentiation
Page 314 and 315:
at or above the usual level. Person
Page 316 and 317: size (_=0.36) which contrasts wildl
Page 318 and 319: sets had all the identified high ef
Page 320 and 321: hospital; the mean of up to 10 pain
Page 322 and 323: eliability of the test and shows th
Page 324 and 325: Chapter 7. Conclusion This thesis r
Page 326 and 327: probably because the form variables
Page 328 and 329: etween different groups of patients
Page 330 and 331: previously unexplored, which comple
Page 332 and 333: statistical tests and missing data
Page 334 and 335: psychopathology in clinical diagnos
Page 336 and 337: 6 scales to categorise commonalitie
Page 338 and 339: Orientation of the researcher, what
Page 340 and 341: Validity Analysis of controlled stu
Page 342 and 343: _ 2 _ _ _ _ 2 _ .3_ 1 1 _ B _ 2 1 2
Page 344 and 345: 6j. Standard differences from mean
Page 346 and 347: Correlation table 16 for DAPA varia
Page 352 and 353: eliefs to depression. cannot be mat
Page 354 and 355: Table 4: summarising changes or sig
Page 356 and 357: Table 6: summarising changes or sig
Page 358 and 359: 13 22y. male Violence and substance
Page 360 and 361: Crosstabulations 1-6: contingency t
Page 362 and 363: Crosstabulation 3: ORIENTATION By B
Page 364 and 365: Crosstabulation 5: FORM OF EXPRESSI
Page 368 and 369: Raters R1-7 score for ORANGE, pics
Page 370 and 371: -4_ _ R-A _________________________
Page 372 and 373: e _ _ -4_ _ R-A ___________________
Page 374 and 375: c _ _ e _ _ -4_ _ R-A _____________
Page 376 and 377: Appendix 3 Table of Authorities 1.
Page 378 and 379: connection from victim to victimize
Page 380 and 381: Hodnett, M.L. (1973), A broader vie
Page 382 and 383: Muller-Braunschweig, H. (1975), Psy
Page 384 and 385: Siegel, L. (1988), The use of mural
Page 386 and 387: Psycho-Analysis , V.6(2):183-200. 3
Page 388 and 389: 10 Fagin, I. (1983), Images of grow
Page 390 and 391: Institute Creative Arts Therapy Rev
Page 392 and 393: psychotics, Perceptual and Motor Sk
Page 394 and 395: Appendix 4 Development of the Descr
Page 396 and 397: D.A.P.A. DESCRIPTIVE ASSESSMENT OF
Page 398 and 399: INTENSITY DEFINITION: Firstly, the
Page 400 and 401: SPACE >10% >25% >55% >80% >100% DEF
Page 402 and 403: Part 2 Rating Sheet for DAPA: Hacki
Page 404 and 405: Rating Sheet for Casenotes DAPA ver
Page 406 and 407: D.A.P.A. DESCRIPTIVE ASSESSMENT OF
Page 408 and 409: Intensity DEFINITION: The brightnes
Page 410 and 411: Form sheet for Artists. Side 2. DAP
Page 412 and 413: Appendix 5 Permission for study, in
Page 414 and 415: North Staffordshire Health Authorit
Page 416 and 417:
Psychiatry Dept., School P.G. Medic
Page 418 and 419:
Bibliography 418
Page 420 and 421:
Psychiatry, 152(suppl.1): 33-57. Ca
Page 422 and 423:
V.11: 139-143. Kaplan, F.F. (1996),
Page 424 and 425:
Reuven, S.K. (1998), Reversal of a
Page 426 and 427:
Blackwell. Arrington, D. (1992), Ar
Page 428 and 429:
MacGregor, J.D. (1989), The Discove
Page 430 and 431:
Research (ICD-10 DCR), Geneva: Auth
show all

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?