02.04.2013 Views

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

omissions, distortions or additions <strong>of</strong> elements (38), although the same type <strong>of</strong> dep<strong>art</strong>ure<br />

from reality (evidence <strong>of</strong> faulty recall) was more marked in Alzheimer's disease than in<br />

controls (36 or 35). <strong>The</strong> displacement variable showed significant differences between<br />

left brain damaged patients and normal controls or right brain damaged patients (35), also<br />

between a patient group p<strong>art</strong>itioned 3 ways (33): (a) non retarded schizophrenic from<br />

retarded schizophrenics; (b) pr<strong>of</strong>ound from other grades <strong>of</strong> mental retardation; and<br />

between acute and chronic schizophrenia.<br />

Summary: <strong>The</strong> polarisation <strong>of</strong> representation <strong>of</strong> reality and logic between controls and<br />

organic brain damage seems to be supported by findings <strong>of</strong> no differences between<br />

schizophrenics, other patients and controls on corresponding indices. It is thus<br />

reasonable to suppose that the results for Alzheimer's disease, as it affects the brain, may<br />

share some <strong>of</strong> the qualities <strong>of</strong> organic brain damage. Displacement <strong>of</strong> main images seems<br />

to strongly indicate general abnormality.<br />

Space<br />

Reliability: 11 experimental studies, 2 reliability studies and 1 validity study generated<br />

36 variables which were grouped between two subjective, one objective content<br />

subcategory, and one formal subcategory. <strong>The</strong>re were 6 variables between 6 studies<br />

which gave item reliabilities and only one unreliable variable in the table. Reliable<br />

subcategories were: coverage <strong>of</strong> the paper (49, 44, 48, 21, 75, 35, 38, 36); relations<br />

between the main elements (3, 35, 61); presence or absence <strong>of</strong> perspective or indicators<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!