10.04.2013 Views

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

downstream of Bonneville Dam. Sockeye smolts comprise a very small fraction of the<br />

overall number of migrating smolts (Ferguson 2006) in any given year. The significance<br />

of fish predation on juvenile chum is unknown. There is little direct evidence that<br />

piscivorous fish in the Columbia River consume juvenile sockeye salmon. Nevertheless,<br />

predation of juvenile sockeye likely occurs. The ongoing Northern Pikeminnow<br />

Management Program (NPMP) has reduced predation-related juvenile salmonid mortality<br />

since 1990. Benefits of recent northern pikeminnow management activities to chum<br />

salmon are unknown. However, it may be comparable to those for other salmon species<br />

with a subyearling juvenile life history (Friesen <strong>and</strong> Ward 1999).<br />

The primary fish predators in estuaries are probably adult salmonids or juvenile<br />

salmonids which emigrate at older <strong>and</strong> larger sizes than others. They include cutthroat<br />

trout (O. clarki) or steelhead smolts preying on chum or pink salmon smolts. Outside<br />

estuaries, many large fish population reside just offshore <strong>and</strong> may consume large<br />

numbers of smolts. These fishes include Pacific hake (Merluccius productus), Pacific<br />

mackerel (Scomber japonicus), lingcod (Ophiodon elongates), spiny dogfish (Squalus<br />

acanthias), various rock fish, <strong>and</strong> lamprey (Beamish, Thomson et al. 1992; Pearcy 1992;<br />

Beamish <strong>and</strong> Neville 1995).<br />

Wildl<strong>and</strong> Fire<br />

Wildl<strong>and</strong> fires that are allowed to burn naturally in riparian or upl<strong>and</strong> areas may benefit<br />

or harm aquatic species, depending on the degree of departure from natural fire regimes.<br />

Although most fires are small in size, large size fires increase the chances of adverse<br />

effects on aquatic species. Large fires that burn near the shores of streams <strong>and</strong> rivers can<br />

have biologically significant short-term effects. They include increased water<br />

temperatures, ash, nutrients, pH, sediment, toxic chemicals, <strong>and</strong> large woody debris<br />

(Buchwalter, S<strong>and</strong>ahl et al. 2004; Rinne 2004). Nevertheless, fire is also one of the<br />

dominant habitat-forming processes in mountain streams (Bisson, Rieman et al. 2003).<br />

As a result, many large fires burning near streams can result in fish kills with the<br />

survivors actively moving downstream to avoid poor water quality conditions (Greswell<br />

1999; Rinne 2004). The patchy, mosaic pattern burned by fires provides a refuge for<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!