10.04.2013 Views

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 49. PRZM-EXAMS exposure estimates from EPA’s BEs.<br />

Scenario:<br />

crop, state<br />

Application:<br />

rate (lbs a.i./A)/ method/<br />

number of applications<br />

279<br />

Acute EEC<br />

(μg/L)<br />

Chronic EEC<br />

60-d average<br />

(μg/L) 1<br />

<strong>Carbaryl</strong><br />

Sweet corn, OH 2/aerial/8; 3.4/aerial/2 53; 46 19; 13<br />

Field corn, OH 2/aerial/4; 1/aerial/2 47; 13 14; 4<br />

Apples, PA 2/aerial/5; 1.2/spray blast/2 31; 12 7; 2<br />

Sugar Beets, MN 1.5/aerial/2; 1.5/aerial/1 23; 7 6; 2<br />

Citrus, FL 5/aerial/4; 3.4/aerial/2 153; 100 41; 23<br />

Peaches, CA 7/aerial/2; 3.5/air blast/1 57; 14 12; 3<br />

Citrus, CA 5/aerial/4; 3.4/aerial/2 20; 7 11; 2<br />

Tomatoes, CA 2/aerial/4; 0.66/air blast/1 17; 2 7; 1<br />

Apples, OR 2/aerial/5; 1.2/aerial/2 19; 3 6; 1<br />

Blackberries, OR 2/aerial/5; 1.9/air blast/1 12; 8 6; 3<br />

Snap beans, OR 1.5/aerial/4; 0.8/ground/1 10; 1.2 1; 0.3<br />

<strong>Carbofuran</strong><br />

Alfalfa, CA 1/foliar/1 6 3.0<br />

Alfalfa, PA 1/foliar/1 7.9 4.1<br />

Cotton, MS 1/in-furrow/1 11 5.5<br />

Grapes, CA 10/soil surface/1 5.5 2.7<br />

Potatoes, ME 1/not reported/2 26 14<br />

Artichokes, CA 2/ground/1 35 19<br />

Cotton, CA 1/in-furrow/1 0.8 0.4<br />

Potatoes, ID 2/foliar/1; 3/in-furrow/1;<br />

6/chemigation/1<br />

<strong>Methomyl</strong><br />

6.2; 0.2; 10.4 4.0; 0.1; 6.2<br />

Lettuce 0.9/aerial/10; 0.225/aerial/15 88; 30 81; 26<br />

Sweet corn 0.45/aerial/16 60 54<br />

Peaches 1.8/aerial/3 99 85<br />

Cotton 0.6/aerial/3 55 47<br />

1<br />

The chronic values reported for methomyl are 56-day average concentrations rather than 60-day<br />

average concentrations.<br />

Utility of EECs for consultation<br />

As described in the Approach to the Assessment section, our exposure analysis begins at<br />

the organism (individual) level of biological organization. We consider the number, age<br />

(or life stage), gender, <strong>and</strong> life histories of the individuals likely to be exposed. This<br />

scale of assessment is essential as adverse effects to individuals may result in populationlevel<br />

consequences, particularly for populations of extremely low abundance.<br />

Characterization of impacts to individuals provides necessary information to assess<br />

potential impacts to populations, <strong>and</strong> ultimately to the species. To assess risk to<br />

individuals, we must consider the highest concentrations to which any individuals of the<br />

population may be exposed. Several lines of evidence discussed below suggest that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!