10.04.2013 Views

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

urbanization throughout the Puget Sound, Hood Canal, <strong>and</strong> Strait of Juan de Fuca regions<br />

have increased sedimentation, raised water temperatures, decreased LWD recruitment,<br />

decreased gravel recruitment, reduced river pools <strong>and</strong> spawning areas, <strong>and</strong> dredged <strong>and</strong><br />

filled estuarine rearing areas (Bishop <strong>and</strong> Morgan 1996 in (NMFS 2008)). Large areas of<br />

the lower rivers have been channelized <strong>and</strong> diked for flood control <strong>and</strong> to protect<br />

agricultural, industrial, <strong>and</strong> residential development.<br />

The NMFS' 2005 Report to Congress on implementation of the Pacific Coastal Salmon<br />

Recovery Fund listed habitat-related factors as the leading limits to Puget Sound Chinook<br />

Salmon <strong>and</strong> Hood-Canal Summer Run Chum recovery (PCSRF 2006). Similarly, the<br />

principal factor for decline of Puget Sound steelhead is the destruction, modification, <strong>and</strong><br />

curtailment of its habitat <strong>and</strong> range. Barriers to fish passage <strong>and</strong> adverse effects on water<br />

quality <strong>and</strong> quantity resulting from dams, the loss of wetl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> riparian habitats, <strong>and</strong><br />

agricultural <strong>and</strong> urban development activities have contributed <strong>and</strong> continue to contribute<br />

to the loss <strong>and</strong> degradation of steelhead habitats in Puget Sound (NMFS 2008).<br />

Industrial Development<br />

More than 100 years of industrial pollution <strong>and</strong> urban development have affected water<br />

quality <strong>and</strong> sediments in Puget Sound. Many different kinds of activities <strong>and</strong> substances<br />

release contamination into Puget Sound <strong>and</strong> the contributing waters. According to the<br />

State of the Sound Report (PSAT 2007) in 2004, more than 1,400 fresh <strong>and</strong> marine<br />

waters in the region were listed as “impaired.” Almost two-thirds of these water bodies<br />

were listed as impaired due to contaminants, such as toxics, pathogens, <strong>and</strong> low dissolved<br />

oxygen or high temperatures, <strong>and</strong> less than one-third had established cleanup plans.<br />

More than 5,000 acres of submerged l<strong>and</strong>s (primarily in urban areas; 1% of the study<br />

area) are contaminated with high levels of toxic substances, including polybrominated<br />

diphenyl ethers (PBDEs; flame retardants), <strong>and</strong> roughly one-third (180,000 acres) of<br />

submerged l<strong>and</strong>s within Puget Sound are considered moderately contaminated. In 2005<br />

the Puget Sound Action Team (PSAT) identified the primary pollutants of concern in<br />

Puget Sound <strong>and</strong> their sources listed below in Table 42.<br />

254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!