10.04.2013 Views

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

exposure values for a few labeled uses using the GENEEC model, which is intended to<br />

provide screening estimates over large geographic regions (Table 50) 1 . The input<br />

parameters used were consistent with recent EPA model inputs (EPA 2006; EPA 2007;<br />

EPA 2007).<br />

Table 50. GENEEC estimated concentrations of carbaryl, carbofuran, <strong>and</strong> methomyl in<br />

surface water adjacent to sweet corn, potatoes, sweet corn, potatoes, <strong>and</strong> citrus.<br />

Chemical use Rate No.* Interval Buffer EEC (μg/L)<br />

Foliar/ ground<br />

application<br />

lbs/<br />

acre<br />

days ft<br />

Sweet Corn<br />

<strong>Carbaryl</strong> 2 8 3 0 397 390 348 272 229<br />

<strong>Carbofuran</strong> 0.5 2 7 0 56 56 55 54 53<br />

<strong>Methomyl</strong><br />

0.45<br />

0.225<br />

14<br />

28<br />

1<br />

1<br />

25<br />

25<br />

Potatoes<br />

307<br />

288<br />

276<br />

259<br />

163<br />

153<br />

72<br />

68<br />

49<br />

46<br />

<strong>Carbaryl</strong> 2 3 7 0 175 172 153 120 101<br />

<strong>Carbofuran</strong> 1 2 5 0 112 112 111 108 106<br />

<strong>Methomyl</strong> 0.9 5 5 25<br />

Citrus<br />

212 191 113 50 34<br />

<strong>Carbaryl</strong> 12 1 - 0 485 476 424 332 280<br />

<strong>Carbofuran</strong> - - - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>Methomyl</strong> 0.9 3 5 25 133 120 71 31 21<br />

*Number of applications<br />

-Not applicable<br />

The EECs for EPA’s effect determinations were derived primarily using the PRZM-<br />

EXAMS model. This model predicts runoff to a “farm pond” based on application<br />

specifications (rate <strong>and</strong> method), properties of the a.i. (solubility, soil adsorption<br />

coefficient, soil metabolisms rate, etc.,), assumed meteorological conditions (amount of<br />

rainfall), <strong>and</strong> other site-specific assumptions [soil type, slope, etc. (EPA 2004)]. The<br />

farm pond scenario is likely a poor surrogate of certain habitats used by salmonids.<br />

In particular, listed salmonids rely extensively upon a variety of off-channel habitats that<br />

would be expected to yield higher pesticide concentrations than would be predicted with<br />

the “farm pond” based PRZM/EXAMS model. Examples of off-channel habitats include<br />

1 EPA characterizes GENEEC as a tier-1 screening model (EPA 2004c). GENEEC is a meta-model of the<br />

PRZM-EXAMS model that incorporates assumptions that are intended to model exposure estimates on a<br />

site vulnerable to runoff. The size of the treated area <strong>and</strong> aquatic habitat (farm pond) are the same as<br />

described for PRZM-EXAMS.<br />

284<br />

24-h<br />

avg<br />

4-d<br />

avg<br />

21-d<br />

avg<br />

60-d<br />

avg<br />

90-d<br />

avg

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!