10.04.2013 Views

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

end of the exposure (time-to-effectAChE activity <strong>and</strong> time-to-recoveryAChE activity, respectively; Figure<br />

2C). The apparent activity level was back-calculated to result in a relative concentration<br />

(concentration/ AChE inhibition EC50) for each day of the growth period for each pulse. The<br />

relative concentration for each day was summed across all the pulses to result in a total apparent<br />

concentration for each day. The sigmoid slope used in the calculation of AChE activity using the<br />

apparent concentration was the arithmetic mean of the sigmoid slopes for each pesticide present<br />

on each day. The timecourse for relative prey abundance was modeled incorporating a one day<br />

spike in prey drift relative to the toxicity <strong>and</strong> available prey base followed by a drop in<br />

abundance due to the toxic impacts (Figure 3C). Recovery is assumed to be due to a constant<br />

influx of invertebrates from connected habitats (aquatic <strong>and</strong> terrestrial) that are not exposed to<br />

the pesticide. Incoming organisms are subject to toxicity if pesticides are still present <strong>and</strong> this<br />

alters the rate of recovery during exposures. Incorporating dynamic effects <strong>and</strong> recovery<br />

variables allows the model to simulate differences in the pharmacokinetics (e.g., the rates of<br />

uptake from the environment <strong>and</strong> of detoxification) of various pesticides <strong>and</strong> simulate<br />

differences in invertebrate community response <strong>and</strong> recovery rates (see below).<br />

The relationship between final ration <strong>and</strong> somatic growth rate (Figure 4C) produces a<br />

relationship representing somatic growth rate over time (Figure 4D), which is then used to model<br />

individual growth rate <strong>and</strong> size over time. The growth models were run for 1,000 individual fish,<br />

with initial weight selected from a normal distribution with a mean of 1.0 g <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation of 0.1 g. The size of 1.0 g was chosen to represent sub-yearling size in the spring prior<br />

to the onset of pesticide application. For each iteration of the model (one day for the organismal<br />

model), the somatic growth rate is calculated for each fish by selecting the parameter values from<br />

normal distributions with specified means <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations (Table 1). The weight for<br />

each fish is then adjusted based on the calculated growth rate to generate a new weight for the<br />

next iteration. The length (days) to run the growth portion of the model was selected to represent<br />

the time from when the fish enter the linear portion of their growth trajectory in the mid to late<br />

spring until they change their growth pattern in the fall due to reductions in temperature <strong>and</strong><br />

resources or until they migrate out of the system. The outputs of the organismal model that are<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ed to the population models consist of mean weights (with st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations) after the<br />

538

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!