10.04.2013 Views

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

We attempted to compare expected concentrations of these pesticides to U.S. Water Quality<br />

Criteria designated pursuant the Clean Water Act, however none are published. We then<br />

evaluated whether any of the state waters within designated critical habitat are listed as impaired<br />

by carbaryl, carbofuran, <strong>and</strong>/or methomyl by searching state 303(d) lists (discussed in the<br />

Environmental Baseline section). Currently, state water quality st<strong>and</strong>ards have been developed<br />

for carbaryl <strong>and</strong> carbofuran, but not for methomyl. Unfortunately, surface water sampling is not<br />

conducted on all freshwater habitats (including designated critical habitats) within the action area<br />

<strong>and</strong> as a result we do not discount areas not sampled. For these reasons, it is also not possible to<br />

determine from 303(d) lists the magnitude of water quality degradation to designated critical<br />

habitat. We also do not rely on 303(d) lists as the sole source of information for degradation of<br />

water quality. In California, Oregon, <strong>and</strong> Washington some streams have been placed on the<br />

303(d) list for carbaryl <strong>and</strong> carbofuran (see Environmental Baseline section) which indicates that<br />

water quality can be degraded by the stressors of the action in salmonid habitats. We located no<br />

listings for methomyl, <strong>and</strong> we located no listings for the three pesticides in the state of Idaho.<br />

Areas of Uncertainty<br />

In this section we list the predominant uncertainties <strong>and</strong> data gaps uncovered by our analysis of<br />

the effects of the proposed action. We do not discuss the entire suite of uncertainties, but<br />

highlight those likely have the most influence on the present analysis.<br />

• Description of the action. We lacked a complete description of EPA-authorized uses of<br />

pesticides containing carbaryl, carbofuran, <strong>and</strong> methomyl as described in labeling of all<br />

pesticide products containing these a.i.s.<br />

• Exposure resulting from non-agricultural uses. We lacked exposure estimates of stressors<br />

of the action associated with non-agricultural uses of these pesticides.<br />

• Exposure to <strong>and</strong> toxicity of pesticide formulations <strong>and</strong> adjuvants. Minimal information<br />

was found on formulations, adjuvants, <strong>and</strong> on other/inert ingredients within registered<br />

formulations.<br />

• Exposure to mixtures. We lacked information on permitted tank mixtures. Additionally,<br />

given that relatively few tank mix combinations are prohibited, it was not feasible to<br />

evaluate all potential combinations of tank mixtures. Pesticide mixtures are found in<br />

427

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!