10.04.2013 Views

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

Carbaryl, Carbofuran, and Methomyl - National Marine Fisheries ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

formulations were presented for bluegill sunfish (L. macrochirus) <strong>and</strong> rainbow trout (O. mykiss).<br />

A single test on rainbow trout was conducted using the formulation Furadan 75WP with a<br />

reported LC50 of 458 μg/L. LC50s for rainbow trout tested with technical carbofuran ranged<br />

from 362-600 μg /L. A number of different formulations (Furadan 4F, Furadan 10G, Furadan<br />

50WP <strong>and</strong> Furadan 75WP) were tested with bluegill sunfish. LC50s ranged from 240-488 μg<br />

carbofuran/L. LC50s for bluegill sunfish tested with technical carbofuran ranged from 88-126<br />

μg a.i/L. Only one formulation test for freshwater invertebrates was reported. D. magna<br />

exposed to “5G” had a survival EC50 of 41 μg /L. Tests with D. magna on technical carbofuran<br />

produced survival EC50s of 29-38.6 μg /L. The estuarine fish Atlantic silverside (Mendia<br />

menidia) was tested in two formulations, Furadan 4F <strong>and</strong> Furadan 15G. LC50s from these tests<br />

were 36 μg a.i./L <strong>and</strong> 64 μg a.i./L, respectively. A test with technical grade on the same species<br />

produced an LC50 of 33 μg a.i./L. (95% CI 27-41 μg a.i./L). The estuarine/marine invertebrate<br />

pink shrimp was tested both in a formulation (Furadan 15G) EC50 13.3 μg a.i./L <strong>and</strong> with<br />

technical (EC50s 4.6-7.3 μg a.i./L, n=2). Based on these data, there is no indication that the<br />

carbofuran formulations tested are more toxic than the a.i. on survival as an endpoint. No long<br />

term studies, such as life cycle studies, with formulations were reported for either fish or<br />

invertebrates.<br />

The methomyl BE (EPA 2003a) <strong>and</strong> Science Chapter for the RED (EPA 1998c) both reported<br />

toxicity data for a 24% formulation <strong>and</strong> a 29% formulation for both fish <strong>and</strong> aquatic<br />

invertebrates. In addition, the BE reported some toxicity data for a 30% formulation. While it is<br />

difficult to make a definitive comparison given the structure of the data, the 24% formulation<br />

appears more toxic to both fish <strong>and</strong> invertebrates. Neither the toxicity section of the BE nor the<br />

use characterization in the Science Chapter list specific products. Thus, we cannot crossreference<br />

the data to a product or determine if it is a currently registered product.<br />

Identified data gaps <strong>and</strong> uncertainties of carbofuran’s, carbaryl’s <strong>and</strong> methomyl’s<br />

toxicity information presented in BEs <strong>and</strong> REDs:<br />

Overall, data provided in the BEs <strong>and</strong> their Science Chapters were insufficient to allow a<br />

thorough evaluation of all identified assessment endpoints <strong>and</strong> measures considered by NMFS.<br />

The Data Evaluation Reviews (DERs) or the original studies may have helped reduce some of<br />

334

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!