10.01.2014 Views

THE BOOK OF POEMS IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY ... - TopReferat

THE BOOK OF POEMS IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY ... - TopReferat

THE BOOK OF POEMS IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY ... - TopReferat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

heart. His frenzied tone and hatred for all things tender and happy recall Pereyaslavtsev's<br />

self-hatred, or more accurately, hatred of Bol'shakov. He buried Bol'shakov along with<br />

his stupid passion, with his love (Я похоронил его с его глупой восторженностью, с<br />

его любовью (125)). Like Pereyaslavtsev, Khodasevich's persona takes pleasure only in<br />

the violent ends of others—others as remote and exotic as American settlers and Carmen.<br />

Khodasevich published "За окном…" in "Утро России" in February 1916,<br />

shortly before Muni's suicide. He chose to republish it in the second edition of<br />

Счастливый домик (1921) rather than the earlier first edition of Путем зерна (1919-<br />

20). This decision suggests that Khodasevich associated the Pereyaslavtsev voice with<br />

his youthful, more decadent poetry and biography. The poem is irresponsible, and, in<br />

light of Muni's suicide, cruel. Still he feels it is significant enough to add to his second<br />

book. The symbolist experiments with двойничество and жизнетворчество are too<br />

important to ignore. By 1919, when he wrote "Рыбак," Khodasevich realized the danger<br />

of these experiments. He returns to the original self—to the voice of Bol'shakov, the<br />

"true" side of the double—and relieves the fisherman/Bol'shakov/Muni of his<br />

psychological struggle and thus his responsibility. The final darkness in Khodasevich's<br />

poem is thus bleaker than in Muni's skazka—it is entirely hopeless, inevitable, fatal.<br />

Khodasevich excised "Рыбак" from the 1927 edition of Путем зерна, severing<br />

ties to Muni, to his previous book, and to his youthful symbolist experiments. He<br />

gradually turned to an entirely different form of двойничество—a potentially positive<br />

form. Instead of escaping outside of himself to create a new identity, he struggled with<br />

the split between body and soul within himself. While the first edition of Путем зерна<br />

seems more heavily weighted towards frustration with this split ("В заботах каждого<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!