1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COMBAT SPEAR<br />
volunteers shortly after they became airborne.<br />
<strong>The</strong> spinning lasted approximately four minutes.<br />
After the spinning stopped, the recovery continued<br />
uneventfully. Because of the incident, twoman<br />
demonstration recoveries were suspended,<br />
and a hazard report was submitted to Seventh<br />
AF. 57 (No additional two-man live surface-to-air<br />
recoveries were attempted until a 7th SOS crew,<br />
commanded by Capt J. W. Bates, extracted two<br />
personnel from the waters off the coast of RAF<br />
Macrihanish, UK, on 2 December 1981.)<br />
With no combat missions being flown into<br />
North Vietnam in November and December, SOG<br />
tasked the squadron to fly combat support missions<br />
throughout the area of responsibility. Unilateral<br />
training sorties were also flown, and personnel<br />
focused on improving facilities at Nha<br />
Trang AB when not in the air. With already one<br />
of the best enlisted quarters in SEA, personnel<br />
continued to improve their barracks during their<br />
off-duty time. Each enlisted six-man aircrew<br />
shared an air-conditioned room on the top floor of<br />
the barracks. Each room was well insulated and<br />
removed from the normal distractions of a<br />
crowded barracks. By housing each crew in its<br />
own room, crew integrity and proper crew rest<br />
were maintained. Nonaircrew squadron personnel<br />
were billeted on the ground floor, which was also<br />
divided into a reading/game room and a room for<br />
recreational activities. Squadron personnel were<br />
responsible for the design, fabrication, painting,<br />
and continued cleanliness of the barracks facility.<br />
58 <strong>The</strong> 15th SOS won the 14th SOW/CC<br />
Outstanding Unit Trophy in November 1968.<br />
During the period officers and assigned civilian<br />
contractors continued to reside downtown in the<br />
Anh Hoa Hotel.<br />
Command and Control<br />
Throughout 1968 relations between SOG and<br />
S eventh AF were strained, even after the signing<br />
of the MOU in the fall of 1967. <strong>The</strong> basic problem<br />
with the MOU was that it was general in nature<br />
and did not specifically address command relationships.<br />
<strong>The</strong> MOU had created, however, the 14th<br />
SOW DCSO position, and the first incumbent to<br />
fill that position arrived at Nha Trang AB on 2<br />
March 1968. In his end of tour report the following<br />
year, he documented the state of affairs at that<br />
time (as he perceived them).<br />
Both Seventh AF and MACSOG were delighted with<br />
the results after the DCSO office was activated. Problems<br />
that previously had been hashed and rehashed in<br />
conferences were bucked to me for solution. Being located<br />
Photo courtesy of Obie Hill<br />
Six-man enlisted flight crew quarters located on Nha<br />
Trang AB. Note TV monitor in center of rear wall and<br />
air conditioner in right rear corner of room. Special<br />
operations crews were authorized air conditioning because<br />
they flew at night and slept during the day.<br />
a considerable distance from Saigon [Nha Trang], I had<br />
no personality problems with either 7AF or MACSOG.<br />
Consequently, each problem could be examined in light<br />
of facts and mission requirements. Fortunately, most<br />
problems were relatively minor in nature and when isolated<br />
from an atmosphere of mutual hostility, the solu -<br />
tion was fairly obvious. MACSOG was well satisfied<br />
with the air support they received, and all mission requirements<br />
were fulfilled. Seventh Air Force was delighted<br />
because minor problems that had previously<br />
consumed an enormous number of man-hours were now<br />
being handled by my office, and they gradually withdrew<br />
from close supervision of MACSOG activities. 59<br />
Thus, according to the first DCSO, the new arrangement<br />
proved to be satisfactory. Subsequent<br />
appraisal by Seventh AF headquarters, however,<br />
indicated that it was still not highly satisfied with<br />
the working relationship between itself and MAC -<br />
SOG. A Seventh AF staff study conducted in July<br />
1968 pointed out several problem areas. <strong>The</strong><br />
study specifically criticized the 1967 MOU insofar<br />
as it addressed only administrative matters and<br />
not the broad spectrum of Seventh AF support of<br />
MACSOG activities. It further noted that Seventh<br />
AF/MACSOG problems frequently could not be resolved<br />
in the absence of mutually agreed upon<br />
directives. As a result of the continued friction<br />
between the two headquarters, MACV was asked<br />
to arbitrate. MACV consequently directed that<br />
Seventh AF, in conjunction with MACSOG, prepare<br />
an MOU to formalize new procedures and to<br />
assure systematic and effective support of SOG<br />
missions. 60 <strong>The</strong> resultant document was identified<br />
as OPORD 460-68, and it greatly expanded and<br />
clarified the earlier MOU.<br />
105