06.03.2015 Views

1 - The Black Vault

1 - The Black Vault

1 - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRAETORIAN STARSHIP<br />

Photo courtesy of John R. Lewis<br />

Project 46 nose strain static test for a 15,000-pound<br />

static load.<br />

August four successful fends were completed using<br />

the new six-man line and the larger P-46 balloons.<br />

On the four test runs, the knives on the<br />

aircraft’s fending lines cut the pickup line on a<br />

single run, but the propellers made a second cut<br />

that caused minor sheet-metal damage to the<br />

left helicopter refueling pod. Additional test<br />

missions were flown during the remainder of<br />

August. During September tow tests of two-,<br />

four-, and six-man packages were successfully<br />

completed. <strong>The</strong> packages were stable, the lift<br />

line could be reached to engage the parabomb,<br />

and bringing the packages into the aircraft<br />

posed no problems. 55<br />

With the fending line and tow test complete,<br />

the test engineers were ready for actual lift-line<br />

engagements by the sky anchor. During the<br />

week of 28 September to 4 October, three Project<br />

46 sorties were completed. During the first<br />

sortie the attempt to retrieve a six-man package<br />

failed due to the inability of the sky-anchor cup<br />

to rotate enough turns to lock in the lift line. On<br />

the second sortie a standard two-man line could<br />

not be picked up by the Project 46 sky anchor.<br />

Before the third sortie, the sky anchor was replaced,<br />

and the new sky anchor successfully retrieved<br />

a standard two-man package. When a<br />

heavier load was engaged, however, the sky anchor<br />

failed again. A Fulton Company engineer<br />

determined that the spring tension in the sky<br />

anchor was not sufficient to overcome the force<br />

exerted on the lift line at engagement and subsequently<br />

decided to increase the spring tension<br />

by 80 percent with a new spring. <strong>The</strong> new<br />

spring was designated the 2X. 56<br />

With the new spring manufactured and installed<br />

in the sky anchor, three more Project 46<br />

sorties were flown in November on the 15th, 22d,<br />

and 23d. <strong>The</strong> 15 November sortie was terminated<br />

early due to a nacelle overheat indication on one<br />

engine. Heavy rains made the normally dry, hard<br />

lake bed at Edwards AFB wet and soft, thus causing<br />

a week’s delay before operations could resume.<br />

During the last two sorties, 15 intercepts were attempted,<br />

with one being fended after the pilot<br />

missed the line with the Fulton yokes. Of the remaining<br />

14 pickups, 11 were successful and three<br />

were failures. <strong>The</strong> Fulton Company representative<br />

determined from the test that, although the 2X<br />

spring handled most sky-anchor engagements, a<br />

heavier 4X spring was needed to ensure consistently<br />

successful results. <strong>The</strong> 2X spring turned<br />

only once in the first one-half second after engagement,<br />

whereas the system required one and onehalf<br />

turns in that time. <strong>The</strong> 4X spring was ordered,<br />

and a January 1987 delivery date was<br />

established to continue the tests. During the<br />

course of the fall test, periodic meetings were held<br />

at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, and at Detachment<br />

4, LAS Ontario, to keep track of progress<br />

made in the Project 46 tests. As 1986 came to a<br />

close, the test team felt that the effort was on<br />

track and looked forward to completing the tests<br />

in early 1987. 57 * * * * * *<br />

Jahnke had moved mountains to keep his Combat<br />

Talons operational in the Pacific. As had been<br />

the case for the other two Talon squadrons, his<br />

operations tempo had been extremely high, having<br />

participated in annual SOF training events<br />

and exercises in Korea, Thailand, the Philippines,<br />

and throughout the Pacific area. To correct the<br />

long-standing maintenance deficiencies experienced<br />

since relocating to Clark AB, the squadron<br />

was assigned an in-house maintenance organiza -<br />

tion by midyear. Some of the personnel transferred<br />

from the 374th Operational Maintenance<br />

Squadron located at Clark AB, but the majority<br />

came to the squadron from stateside locations. By<br />

27 June personnel had arrived to form the nucleus<br />

of the squadron’s dedicated maintenance<br />

flight, and by year’s end 140 maintenance specialists<br />

had been assigned to the special operations<br />

squadron. 58<br />

During most of 1986 the 1st SOS was plagued<br />

with a lack of airframes, especially during the<br />

third quarter of the year. Aircraft 62-1843 and<br />

63-7785 were both in PDM at LAS Ontario, and<br />

306

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!