1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Early in the spring of 1993, all three flying<br />
squadrons had their unit mission statements updated<br />
to reflect their new operational capabilities.<br />
Changes made included adding helicopter refueling<br />
for the 1st SOS and deleting its sea surveillance<br />
mission. <strong>The</strong> addition of the helicopter refu eling<br />
mission was required after the 1st SOS received<br />
its first Combat Talon aircraft modified with aerial<br />
refueling pods. With the 1st SOS acquiring the<br />
helicopter refueling modification, the 17th SOS<br />
was scheduled to receive the new Combat Talon II<br />
aircraft and return its assigned HC-130s to other<br />
units in the United States. <strong>The</strong> 1st SOS had<br />
maintained the capability to perform sea surveillance<br />
since the early 1970s, but it had not been<br />
tasked to perform the mission for the past several<br />
years. 89 Training required to maintain the sea<br />
surveillance capability was eliminated.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first six months of 1993 also saw an acute<br />
manning shortfall for the 1st SOS. <strong>The</strong> squadron<br />
experienced a shortage of navigators and loadmasters.<br />
It also suffered from a lack of aircrew<br />
experience as it rebuilt following the complete<br />
turnover of personnel in 1992. <strong>The</strong> squadron was<br />
often assigned crew members fresh from initial<br />
flight training or crew members from bomber,<br />
fighter, or transport units. <strong>The</strong> rapid growth of<br />
the Combat Talon II crew force in the United<br />
States and in Europe had drained the experienced<br />
CT I aircrew and maintenance pool. 90 Inexperienced<br />
crew members required additional training<br />
sorties, but they were enthusiastic about the<br />
Combat Talon mission and worked hard to gain<br />
experience in the shortest amount of time.<br />
On 25 June 1993 Stankovich relinquished com -<br />
mand of the 353d SOG to Colonel Thigpen, who ha d<br />
been the deputy commander, 1st SOG, before coming<br />
to Kadena AB. <strong>The</strong> ceremony was officiated by<br />
General Fister and was attended by General<br />
Rokosz, the commander of SOCPAC. Stankovich<br />
had made great strides in acquiring facilities for<br />
the emergency beddown of the group at both<br />
Kadena and Osan ABs. It would fall to Thigpen<br />
to continue the aggressive facilities renovation/<br />
con struction program already under way and to<br />
prepare the group for its ORI that was scheduled<br />
during Exercise Foal Eagle in the fall. 91<br />
When Thigpen assumed command in June, the<br />
353d SOG had 21 facilities projects in the construction<br />
phase at Kadena AB and three more in<br />
MOUNT PINATUBO TO OPERATION JOINT ENDEAVOR<br />
the design stage. At Osan AB 19 projects were in<br />
the works for the 31st SOS. Some of the Kadena<br />
AB projects called for major renovations to buildings,<br />
thus requiring relocation of the group’s<br />
squadrons during the construction phase. For the<br />
1st SOS the squadron had to move to two rooms<br />
in building 3524 during the renovation of its operations<br />
facility, a building that had been formerly<br />
occupied by an SR-71 squadron. <strong>The</strong> group<br />
was scattered across the sprawling Kadena AB<br />
complex in 12 different buildings, sharing some<br />
facilities with 18th Wing units. Although the fa -<br />
cilities met minimum requirements, they did not<br />
meet planned future growth requirements or address<br />
organizational changes under the new ob -<br />
jective force restructuring directed by General<br />
McPeak. Additionally, the wide dispersal of 353d<br />
SOG buildings was not conducive to unity of command.<br />
As a result of these shortcomings, Colonel<br />
Thigpen called for a “comprehensive review of fa -<br />
cilities requirements” in late June. He established<br />
a facilities working group to assess the group’s<br />
long-term needs. 92<br />
Over the course of the summer, the working<br />
group reassessed the 353d SOG’s building requirements<br />
with an eye towards future growth<br />
and consolidation. <strong>The</strong> working group developed a<br />
list of objectives that included group consolida -<br />
tion, adequate (as opposed to minimum) space for<br />
its assigned units, maintaining unit integrity, and<br />
providing a quality environment in which to work.<br />
<strong>The</strong> recent CT II SATAF had identified the need<br />
for a second hangar for the group, and the working<br />
group developed further justification for the<br />
facility. In addition to the CT II requirement,<br />
maintenance needed an additional hangar to<br />
minimize aircraft downtime, perform corrosion control,<br />
and to operate a fuel cell facility.* Sufficient<br />
storage space for the group’s Readiness Spares<br />
Package, its Benson tanks, and its aircraft maintenance<br />
supplies generated additional facility requirements.<br />
A strategic facilities plan was developed<br />
by the working group that identified each<br />
group requirement and how it could be met. <strong>The</strong><br />
plan was finalized in September 1993. 93<br />
<strong>The</strong> decision to permanently beddown the 353d<br />
SOG at Kadena AB came on 24 September 1993<br />
when US Forces Japan (USFJ) released an official<br />
statement announcing the group’s new status. It<br />
had been nearly two and one-half years since<br />
__________<br />
*Aircraft assigned to the 1st and 17th SOS routinely waited days to get into the 18th Wing fuel cell facility due to higher priority for Kadena-assigned<br />
F-15 aircraft. <strong>The</strong> group was given fuel cell priority from 1800 on Friday until 0800 on Monday. Both the MC-130E and the HC-130P/N were older<br />
aircraft that required fuel cell repair on a more frequent basis than the newer C-130H model. <strong>The</strong> situation was unfair to group maintenance personnel<br />
because it compelled them to work weekends to repair their aircraft after the aircraft sat during the week. <strong>The</strong> addition of a second-group-assigned<br />
hangar where fuel cell repair could be accomplished became a high priority for the facilities’ working group.<br />
389