1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PRAETORIAN STARSHIP<br />
ready for production as the new Combat Talon II<br />
aircraft. During Phase II testing, significant<br />
changes made by Lockheed-Marietta after Phase I<br />
had resulted in significant improvements in the<br />
areas of avionics, equipment, and aircraft design.<br />
From 4 to 6 November the OUE team attended<br />
the Combat Talon II configuration conference.<br />
<strong>The</strong> conference centered on Credible Sport II<br />
OUE findings and the application of those findings<br />
to Combat Talon II. 59<br />
With Phase II completed and the final report<br />
published, action was required to determine the<br />
final disposition of the Credible Sport aircraft (74-<br />
1686). Uttaro had pursued assignment of the aircraft<br />
to the 1st SOW earlier in the year, but in a<br />
June 1982 message to Air Staff, TAC declined to<br />
support the initiative. Subsequently, Air Staff<br />
made the decision to return the aircraft to MAC<br />
when Credible Sport II, Phase II, testing was<br />
completed. With the announcement in the fall of<br />
1982 that MAC would absorb all USAF special<br />
operations assets the following spring, action was<br />
renewed within the 1st SOW to have aircraft 74-<br />
1686 assigned to Hurlburt Field. In November<br />
Schwartz submitted a staff package to MAC<br />
through the 1st SOW wing commander, Col Hugh<br />
L. Cox III, with rationale and justification for retaining<br />
the aircraft in the wing. Combat Talon II<br />
designated aircraft were just beginning their initial<br />
construction phase at Lockheed and would<br />
not be modified into Combat Talon IIs for another<br />
three years. <strong>The</strong> 1st SOW felt that the Credible<br />
Sport aircraft could provide an interim capability<br />
until the new aircraft became available. 60 <strong>The</strong><br />
proposal also outlined an initiative to exchange<br />
one of the new C-130H aircraft earmarked for the<br />
Combat Talon II program for the Credible Sport<br />
aircraft. In the end, however, MAC agreed with<br />
TAC and did not support assignment of aircraft<br />
74-1686 to the 1st SOW. <strong>The</strong> aircraft was destined<br />
to remain at Warner Robins and never fly<br />
again as an airlifter—the cost to demodify the aircraft<br />
to its original configuration exceeded its<br />
value to the Air Force. <strong>The</strong> aircraft would eventually<br />
be transferred to the Warner Robins Aircraft<br />
Museum, where it remained from that time forward.<br />
Special operations was denied a valuable<br />
asset that would have undoubtedly improved its<br />
airland infiltration/exfiltration capability.<br />
TAC and MAC Strike a Deal<br />
Since the failed rescue attempt in 1980, special<br />
operations had been scrutinized at all levels to<br />
determine how available resources could be better<br />
organized and trained. During 1982 the Air Force<br />
inspector general conducted a functional management<br />
inspection (FMI) of Air Force special operations<br />
forces and determined that SOF should be<br />
consolidated under one command to enhance<br />
available resources. <strong>The</strong> 1982 Defense Guidance<br />
and the Air Force 2000 study identified the lower<br />
end of the conflict spectrum as the most likely<br />
area of involvement of US forces over the next 20<br />
years. <strong>The</strong> net result was an increase in SOF requirements.<br />
To address those requirements, Air<br />
Force/XO hosted an SOF working group from 13<br />
to 22 July 1982, which reviewed existing capabilities<br />
and presented a series of recommendations to<br />
the Air Force Council on 31 August. 61<br />
Because of these actions, TAC and MAC convened<br />
a study group in the fall of 1982 to respond<br />
to the SOF study group recommendations and to<br />
the IG’s FMI report. <strong>The</strong> study group developed a<br />
proposal that consolidated special operations and<br />
combat rescue under MAC. <strong>The</strong> group recommended<br />
that the consolidation take effect on 1<br />
April 1983, with minimal disruption in basing<br />
and force distribution. Special operations forces<br />
and combat rescue would retain their unique<br />
identities, with the overseas CINCs having operational<br />
control over the forces stationed in their<br />
respective theaters. On 7 December 1982, the Air<br />
Force formally announced the decision to consolidate<br />
SOF under MAC. For the first time, the<br />
Combat Talon community would reside under one<br />
command, which would eventually result in<br />
standardization of equipment and an increase in<br />
assignment opportunities for SOF personnel. 62 In<br />
December 1982, however, there was little enthusiasm<br />
for the consolidation plan in the three Combat<br />
Talon units.<br />
1983: Combat Talon Moves to MAC<br />
<strong>The</strong> New Year saw the 1st SOS as busy as<br />
ever. On 1 March 1983 MAC assumed command<br />
of all USAF special operations forces, including<br />
the 1st SOS in the Pacific. At Clark AB the 1st<br />
SOS became a tenant unit to the 3d TFW along<br />
with the 374th TAW, which was also a MAC unit<br />
located at Clark. <strong>The</strong> 374th was assigned maintenance<br />
responsibility for the 1st SOS Combat Talons,<br />
since both were MAC units. Operational control<br />
of the 1st SOS was retained by Headquarters<br />
PACAF, while command of the unit passed to the<br />
newly created MAC-assigned 2d Air Division at<br />
Hurlburt Field. <strong>The</strong> first commander of the 2d AD<br />
was Col Hugh Cox, who was the former commander<br />
of the 1st SOW. <strong>The</strong> 2d AD was assigned<br />
264