1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PRAETORIAN STARSHIP<br />
Air Operations—1968<br />
Figures on aircraft utilization in 1968 reflected<br />
reduced combat operations over North Vietnam<br />
compared to those of 1967. Combat Talon aircraft<br />
successfully executed five of 21 resupply missions.<br />
On the other hand, the percentage of flight time<br />
committed to logistical airlift increased from 65 to<br />
85 percent of total hours flown. Combined cargo<br />
tonnage of Heavy Hook and Combat Spear operations<br />
totaled over 8 million pounds, and more<br />
than 34,000 personnel were transported by the<br />
two units. 61 1969: Tasking Outside<br />
North Vietnam<br />
Colonel Bunn succeeded Colonel Hines as the<br />
second commander of the 15th SOS on 4 September<br />
1968. He remained in command until 27<br />
March 1969, when Lt Col John R. Kummer replaced<br />
him. At that time Bunn became the 14th<br />
SOW/DCSO after the incumbent DCSO was killed<br />
in an aircraft accident. 62 <strong>The</strong> problems experienced<br />
during the last half of 1968 in personnel<br />
accountability for 1st Flight Detachment was<br />
solved when both 1st Flight and the 15th SOS<br />
moved into their joint operations building during<br />
the week of 13 January 1969. <strong>The</strong> colocated facility<br />
brought the two units into a closer relationship<br />
than was possible with separate facilities. 63<br />
Relationships between Seventh AF and SOG did<br />
not improve, even after OPORD 460-68 was finalized.<br />
By the first of February 1969, in an apparent<br />
effort to exert its authority over SOG-dedicated assets,<br />
Seventh AF made the decision to task 15th<br />
SOS aircraft to fly missions when not otherwise<br />
employed by SOG. From 3 through 11 February,<br />
Seventh AF tasked the 15th SOS to fly seven<br />
flare-illumination missions, although the aircrew<br />
had neither flare training nor any flare dispersal<br />
equipment aboard the Combat Talon. In 1973, Lt<br />
Col Marlon Banks, then retired, recalled his crew<br />
checkout to drop flares and his first flare mission.<br />
We went out one afternoon and got an hour of training<br />
from an EOD [explosive ordnance disposal] type on how<br />
to set your time delay and everything, and launch a<br />
flare and hook it up so it would pop the string and light.<br />
We put some 200 odd flares on board. Our mission that<br />
night was strictly a delaying tactic. We were to illuminate<br />
a [road] intersection for eight hours. . . . We didn’t<br />
have any FACs with us normally if we saw anything to<br />
call strikes on. We were briefed on the [AAA] threat—<br />
how high the 37 mm and 57 mm could go. Well, it [the<br />
threat] ran me up to 14,000 feet. You couldn’t work<br />
without oxygen. . . . That was probably one of the worst<br />
missions I’ve ever been on. I’ve never seen so much<br />
firepower. It was all there, AAA, and I’m sure none of it<br />
was radar controlled or we wouldn’t be here today. . . .<br />
We would vary our altitude every pass two to three<br />
thousand feet.<br />
It [AAA] would go up above us, sometimes below us. . . . I<br />
would say they had 6 to 9 installations—batteries—and<br />
they would sometimes all fire at the same time, sometimes<br />
three or four at the same time. We used up a lot of<br />
their ammo that night for them. After six hours, we were<br />
out of flares, thank goodness, and left. 64<br />
<strong>The</strong> continued debate over who had OPCON of<br />
the 15th SOS Talons was temporarily resolved<br />
when Seventh AF discontinued tasking the Combat<br />
Talon for flare missions after the 11 February<br />
mission. SOG adopted the tactic of tasking<br />
the 15th SOS, with its higher-mission priority,<br />
every time Seventh AF tasked the unit. After 11<br />
February the situation was not resolved, but<br />
rather an uneasy truce went into effect. OPORD<br />
460-68 had proven to be inadequate because it<br />
still did not specifically address command rela -<br />
tionships between SOG and Seventh AF.<br />
As was the case in 1968, meetings were again<br />
held throughout 1969 to further resolve command<br />
relationships. On 1 November 1969 an updated<br />
OPORD 460-70 was signed. <strong>The</strong> stated<br />
purpose of this OPORD was to establish procedures<br />
for command, control, and support of forces<br />
designated to support COMUSMACV Footboy air<br />
operations. 65 It tasked Headquarters Seventh AF,<br />
14th SOW, 314th TAW (CCK, Taiwan), and the<br />
15th SOS at Nha Trang AB. Mission capabilities<br />
of the 15th SOS were allocated in support of SOG<br />
operations. It placed the 15th SOS under the operational<br />
control of the commander, Seventh AF,<br />
administered through DCSO, 14th SOW. 66 <strong>The</strong><br />
OPORD established Seventh AF/Director of Operations<br />
as the action agency responsible for<br />
monitoring the SOG Mission Fragmentary Order.<br />
As such, Seventh AF/DO was tasked to keep<br />
abreast of all Combat Spear activities and to<br />
maintain timely coordination with SOG 32 (Air<br />
Studies Branch) on all matters.<br />
<strong>The</strong> OPORD went on to delineate specific responsibilities<br />
of the 14th SOW/DCSO. <strong>The</strong> DCSO<br />
was tasked to exercise operational control of the<br />
15th SOS for the commander, Seventh AF, during<br />
all missions operating within Seventh AF’s area<br />
of responsibility. <strong>The</strong> DCSO was also responsible<br />
for Seventh AF Frag Orders and for direct tasking<br />
by SOG for USAF assets under his control.<br />
He continually informed Seventh AF/DOCO,<br />
314th TAW, and SOG of technical and scheduling<br />
details in support of Footboy air operations and<br />
SOG combat airlift requirements. Mission details<br />
106