1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PRAETORIAN STARSHIP<br />
Force control the previous fall, it was apparent<br />
that the 90th SOS’s days in SEA were numbered.<br />
<strong>The</strong> driving force keeping the unit in South Vietnam<br />
was SOG, and SOG was in its last four<br />
months of existence. Air Force leadership was still<br />
convinced that the mission could be performed<br />
from an offshore location. Throughout South Vietnam,<br />
the US military was withdrawing and turn -<br />
ing over facilities to its Vietnamese counterparts.<br />
On 3 January 1972, with three of four authorized<br />
aircraft possessed, the 90th SOS sent aircraft<br />
64-0567 for IRAN at CCK and subsequently on to<br />
the 7th SOS in Germany. In exchange the 90th<br />
received aircraft 64-0551. From January to March<br />
1972, the 90th flew 164 MACSOG-tasked missions,<br />
the majority being PSYOPS leaflet drops<br />
into Cambodia. 121<br />
At the squadron level, rumors continued to<br />
abound regarding the relocation of the squadron.<br />
During the latter part of the quarter, the squadron<br />
was notified that it would move to Kadena<br />
AB, Okinawa, by mid-April. Colonel Pinard and<br />
his staff set about planning the details of the<br />
move. It soon became apparent that there was<br />
insufficient airlift to move the squadron expeditiously,<br />
so squadron loadmasters developed load<br />
plans to move everything by way of organic airlift.<br />
Concurrently, all SOG missions were supported<br />
during the April move. By the end of April, all<br />
90th SOS personnel and equipment had been relocated<br />
to Kadena AB. Although the unit continued<br />
to support SEA operations for another two<br />
years, relocation outside South Vietnam closed a<br />
colorful chapter in Combat Talon history. On 15<br />
May 1972 SOG was deactivated and was redesignated<br />
the Strategic Technical Directorate Assistance<br />
Team. 122<br />
Six years of Combat Talon support to SOG<br />
achieved mixed results, primarily due to various<br />
obstacles endemic to SEA operations. <strong>The</strong> follow -<br />
ing factors were the major limitations to overall<br />
mission success.<br />
1. North Vietnam, under a strong totalitarian regime,<br />
was a closed society with efficient antisubversion<br />
machinery.<br />
2. High echelon control and mission approval/disapproval<br />
procedures impeded the planning and execu -<br />
tion of operations.<br />
3. Diplomatic restrictions, such as the initial limitation<br />
on overflights of Laotian territory and on the<br />
use of Thai facilities, restricted flexible planning of<br />
missions.<br />
4. Terrain features and climatic conditions imposed<br />
severe difficulties in achieving accurate aerial delivery<br />
of personnel and supplies.<br />
5. <strong>The</strong> North Vietnamese and Viet Cong apparently<br />
had a good intelligence collection system near Long<br />
Thanh training facility and possibly had secured<br />
information sources in the South Vietnamese Strategic<br />
Technical Directorate.<br />
6. <strong>The</strong>re was not full cooperation between the American<br />
Embassy, Vientiane, and MACSOG.<br />
7. <strong>The</strong> air defense system of North Vietnam prevented<br />
operations in the vicinity of population centers for<br />
both the C-123 Heavy Hook and the C-130 Combat<br />
Talon.<br />
8. A shortage of air assets limited the number of com -<br />
bat operations and training exercises.<br />
9. Navigational aids on SOG fixed-wing aircraft did<br />
not enable pinpoint delivery accuracy in aerial<br />
drops over obscured drop zones.<br />
10. Heavy cloud cover and other missions of higher priority<br />
sometimes denied SOG the necessary aerial<br />
photography for mission planning. 123<br />
<strong>The</strong> full extent of USAF’s contribution to the<br />
SOG UW program cannot be measured. Statistics<br />
relate only part of the story and do not capture<br />
the color of the SOG mission and the people who<br />
executed it. USAF members participating in SOG<br />
operations were highly dedicated, well trained,<br />
and operated sophisticated aircraft to support unusual<br />
missions. <strong>The</strong> organization itself was unusual.<br />
It was flexible and divorced from standard<br />
command and control channels. Stringent security<br />
procedures wrapped it in a mantle of secrecy.<br />
124 Combat Talon crews continued to support<br />
US operations in SEA operating from Kadena AB<br />
and from its forward operating location (FOL) in<br />
Thailand.<br />
Redesignation as the 1st SOS<br />
With transfer of the 90th SOS to Kadena AB,<br />
Okinawa, in March 1972, the squadron’s chain of<br />
command also changed. <strong>The</strong> unit consisted of 38<br />
officers and 44 enlisted men and was assigned to<br />
the 18th Tactical Fighter Wing at Kadena AB.<br />
<strong>The</strong> 18th TFW reported to the 313th Air Division,<br />
also located at Kadena AB, and the 313th<br />
AD reported to Fifth AF at Yakota AB, Japan.<br />
Above Fifth AF was PACAF at Hickham AFB,<br />
Hawaii, and Headquarters United States Air Force,<br />
at the Pentagon. 125 When the unit deployed to its<br />
FOL location in Thailand, OPCON was exercised<br />
by Thirteenth AF, which was the numbered air<br />
force responsible for all Air Force operations originating<br />
from that country. With the reorganization<br />
of SOG and the end of US combat forces stationed<br />
in Vietnam, both SOG and Seventh AF were no<br />
longer in the 90th SOS’s chain of command.<br />
During the months following relocation, Colonel<br />
Pinard and his staff stayed busy with beddown<br />
requirements at Kadena AB. Building 3433<br />
114