1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE SON TAY PRISONER OF WAR RAID<br />
security. General Manor vehemently denied both.<br />
He pointed out that every US intelligence agency<br />
had contributed to the mission, including the CIA<br />
and DIA. Although some reports indicated the<br />
CIA had not been consulted (and the CIA did little<br />
to refute this claim), the CIA had been supportive<br />
of the operation from the start. <strong>The</strong> American<br />
prisoners were probably moved because of summer<br />
flooding of the <strong>Black</strong> River that ran just outside<br />
the walls of Son Tay Prison. Brig Gen John<br />
P. Flynn, Retired, a former POW released by<br />
North Vietnam in 1973, contends that the prisoners<br />
had been moved from Son Tay because North<br />
Vietnam had begun to upgrade the prison—it had<br />
not originally been built as a prison and had serious<br />
security shortfalls. <strong>The</strong> Soviet Union and<br />
China had provided grant money, and some of<br />
this money had been used to repair and modify<br />
POW facilities. During the upgrade at Son Tay,<br />
prisoners were moved to an alternate location. Activity<br />
detected by US spy satellites was actually<br />
the construction crew working on the compound.<br />
Since American prisoners and the construction<br />
workers dressed the same in black pajama-like<br />
clothing, the fact that the prisoners had been<br />
moved went undetected. 86 As to the notion that<br />
the raid had been compromised by a breach of<br />
security, General Manor pointed out that the operation<br />
was a complete surprise to North Vietnam.<br />
Had they known the raid was coming, General<br />
Manor surmised, they would have ambushed<br />
the raiders and used the failure for propaganda<br />
purposes.<br />
John Gargus, lead navigator on Cherry 2, recalled<br />
that when the raiders landed back at<br />
Udorn RTAFB after the raid, they were disappointed<br />
in not having rescued the Americans but<br />
felt good about the raid and were satisfied with<br />
the effort they had made. Out of the entire operation,<br />
one US Army soldier was grazed by a bullet<br />
on the inside of his thigh, and a USAF helicopter<br />
crew chief suffered a broken ankle during the controlled<br />
crash of Banana 1. Every aspect of the raid<br />
had been executed as planned. 87 <strong>The</strong> plan had<br />
worked perfectly. <strong>The</strong> raiders had penetrated<br />
North Vietnamese defenses, landed, and deployed<br />
troops, and the troops had secured the area and<br />
searched every building. Everyone was recovered,<br />
and the area was safely egressed. <strong>The</strong>re was no<br />
loss of American life, but no Americans were<br />
freed. 88 As the weeks passed after the raid, how -<br />
ever, the US press labeled the entire operation a<br />
failure and accused the raiders of bringing additional<br />
hardship on the prisoners. For many raiders,<br />
years of self-incrimination and doubt ensued.<br />
It was not until the 25th anniversary of the return<br />
of the American prisoners of war in 1998 did<br />
Major Gargus finally accept the raid as the singlemost<br />
positive event of the POWs’ long captivity<br />
and that, indeed, it was a success. 89<br />
Thanks to the pioneering work of Colonel<br />
Blosch and Major Franklin, and their crews, the<br />
Talon community made great strides because of<br />
the raid, both in equipment and in combat tactics.<br />
Before the raid the Talon fleet was scheduled for<br />
extensive modification and upgrades, which werelater<br />
designated as MOD-70. <strong>The</strong> FLIR system<br />
that was temporarily installed on the Talons was<br />
the most notable addition. It had proven to be effective<br />
in assisting the aircrew during low-level<br />
precision navigation. Jamming of GCI controller<br />
frequencies was also proven quite effective. Although<br />
MOD-70 did not include a standoff jamming<br />
capability, European-assigned Talons did receive<br />
this capability in the late 1970s. 90<br />
For the Combat Talon community, Son Tay was<br />
a resounding success. Lessons learned would be applied<br />
for years to come. <strong>The</strong> prestige of the entire<br />
Combat Talon community was enhanced by being<br />
part of such a noble endeavor. Ten years later, at a<br />
place called Desert One in Iran, America would<br />
once again question its ability and commitment<br />
to execute another rescue mission—the rescue of<br />
Americans held hostage in Tehran. As it was at Son<br />
Tay, Combat Talon would be an integral part of the<br />
Iranian operation. In failure, however, Desert One<br />
would prove to be the salvation of Combat Talon<br />
and would provide the catalyst for the rebirth of<br />
modern special operations.<br />
Notes<br />
1. USAF oral history interview with Lt Col Keith R. Grimes,<br />
10 September 1992, USAF HRA, Maxwell AFB, Ala., 2.<br />
2. W. J. McQuillen, USAFSOF historian, “Son Tay POW<br />
Rescue Attempt Operation,” monograph, Eglin AFB, Fla., 25<br />
February 1971, USAF HRA, Maxwell AFB, Ala., 1.<br />
3. Grimes, 2.<br />
4. McQuillen, 2.<br />
5. Grimes, 4–5.<br />
6. Ibid., 6–7.<br />
7. Ibid.<br />
8. Ibid., 15–16.<br />
9. Ibid., 14–16.<br />
10. Ibid., 24.<br />
11. Ibid., 32.<br />
12. Benjamin F. Schemmer, <strong>The</strong> Raid (New York: Harper<br />
& Row, 1976), 67–68.<br />
157