06.03.2015 Views

1 - The Black Vault

1 - The Black Vault

1 - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRAETORIAN STARSHIP<br />

interest the conventional Air Force had backed<br />

away from the controversial issue. 21<br />

<strong>The</strong> year of 1984 had been a pivotal one for Air<br />

Force SOF. From a position of high-level AFSOF<br />

support (the SOF Master Plan) to an attempt to<br />

divest itself of rotary-wing SOF (Initiative 17),<br />

the Air Force had emerged in 1985 committed to<br />

rebuilding its SOF capability. Support at the congressional<br />

level undoubtedly turned the tide in<br />

favor of special operations, but the roller-coaster<br />

ride that had occurred during 1984 convinced<br />

many in Congress (both in the House and Senate)<br />

that special operations throughout the three services<br />

was broken. Visionaries in Congress worked<br />

over the next two years to fix the problem. For<br />

Combat Talon II, the first aircraft was delivered<br />

during 1984 without an operational radar, and<br />

five more aircraft were scheduled to be delivered<br />

during 1985. <strong>The</strong> coming year would be a frustrating<br />

one for the Twenty-Third AF and for the<br />

Combat Talon community.<br />

New MAC-Sponsored SOF<br />

Modernization Programs<br />

Throughout 1984 MAC had been listening and<br />

reacting to developments in Washington. <strong>The</strong><br />

command had strongly opposed Initiative 17, with<br />

CINCMAC the only dissenting four-star at the<br />

Corona fall commanders conference. Working on<br />

the assumption that Initiative 17 would be eventually<br />

turned around by Congress, the Headquarters<br />

MAC staff, working in concert with the Twenty-<br />

Third AF, developed its five-year POM for fiscal<br />

years 1986–90 that recommended funding of<br />

seven new SOF programs. Upon review the Air<br />

Staff later added three additional programs based<br />

on the SOF Master Plan. <strong>The</strong> 10 SOF programs<br />

and the fiscal year proposed for funding them included<br />

the following:<br />

1. Night Vision Goggles: Procure 1,015 AN/AVS-6<br />

Night Vision Goggles (FYs 87–90)<br />

2. AC-130H Sensor Improvement: Provide improve -<br />

ments needed to maintain gunship capability to<br />

support JCS tasking, including ECM, moving-target<br />

indicator, and low-light level TV (FYs 87–90)<br />

3. AC/MC-130 Defensive System: Provide ECM upgrade<br />

to the MC-130E, and ECM and navigation<br />

equipment upgrade on the AC-130A (FYs 87–90)<br />

4. Probe Refueling: Procure high-speed drogues and<br />

“snap-top” probes for modifying SOF fixed-wing<br />

aircraft (FYs 87–90)<br />

5. HH-53 Conversion: Transfer and modify aircraft<br />

from the 6594th Test Group to the AFSOF (FYs<br />

87–90)<br />

6. Pacific Build-up: Place six HH-53s and two HC-130<br />

tankers from the 6594th in the Pacific (FYs 87–90)<br />

7. CAMPS Maintenance: Fund hardware and maintenance<br />

for four computer-aided mission planning<br />

systems (CAMPS) (FYs 87–90)<br />

8. Flying Hour Increase: Increase flying hours available<br />

for JCS taskings (FYs 86–90)<br />

9. Manpower: Provide manning at Pope and Charleston<br />

AFBs to support MAC SOLL activities (FYs<br />

87–90)<br />

10. Combat Control Team Manpower: Fund 22 additional<br />

CCT personnel in direct support of the Joint<br />

Special Operations Command (JSOC) (FYs<br />

87–90) 22<br />

<strong>The</strong> Combat Talon II requirement had been increased<br />

from the original 12 aircraft to 19 PAA/2<br />

BAI (total of 21 aircraft) based on the SOF Master<br />

Plan. A deputy secretary of defense memorandum<br />

of 23 August 1984 included one additional Combat<br />

Talon II aircraft in fiscal years 1988, 1989, and<br />

1990 (for a total of 24 aircraft), and the Budget<br />

Estimate Submission for 1985 included the additional<br />

three aircraft. <strong>The</strong> Air Force Council also approved<br />

a 90-aircraft HH-60A program to replace obsolete<br />

AF rescue helicopters but did not support<br />

funding of the 24 combat rescue HH-60Ds. 23 Without<br />

the HH-60D program, the sophisticated glass<br />

cockpit and integrated avionics systems earmarked<br />

for Combat Talon II would not be developed. <strong>The</strong><br />

decision would result in a delay in the fielding of the<br />

new Talons at a much higher cost per aircraft.<br />

Along with the new programs, Headquarters<br />

MAC also supported an aggressive Special Operations<br />

Forces-Improvements program designed to<br />

enhance existing SOF weapons systems. <strong>The</strong><br />

SOF-I program included $103.7 million in the fiscal<br />

years 1984–88 period and included improvements<br />

in the MC-130E and AC-130H fleets. <strong>The</strong><br />

SOF-I program included the following:<br />

1. A highly accurate inertial navigation system,<br />

an infrared warning receiver (AAR-44), radar<br />

detection (WJ-1840), and digital burst<br />

message communications.<br />

2. A radar jammer (the ALQ-117 Pave Mint)<br />

for six of the 14 MC-130Es.<br />

3. Additional AAQ-10 FLIR sensors for the<br />

Combat Talon.<br />

4. Gunport covers for the AC-130H to allow aircraft<br />

pressurization at high altitude.<br />

5. An improved fire control system for the AC-<br />

130H.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SOF-I program also funded 23 AAQ-4 IR jammers<br />

for the HH-53B/C/H helicopters. 24<br />

<strong>The</strong> Air Force POM included additional improvements<br />

not included in the proposed MAC<br />

SOF-I program. Combat Talons would get radar<br />

jammers for the remaining eight MC-130Es and<br />

296

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!