1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
1 - The Black Vault
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PRAETORIAN STARSHIP<br />
1986: <strong>The</strong> Goldwater–Nichols<br />
Defense Reorganization Act<br />
Representative Daniel’s article had accomplished<br />
its primary goal—it created dialogue<br />
within Congress and the Department of Defense<br />
on ways to improve special operations. In January<br />
1986 Sen. William Cohen, in an article published<br />
in Armed Forces Journal International, “A Defense<br />
Special Operations Agency: Fix for a SOF<br />
Capability That Is Most Assuredly Broken,”<br />
called for a national special operations agency. He<br />
outlined an organization that he named the Defense<br />
Special Operations Agency (DSOA), which<br />
would be made up of two major components—an<br />
agency staff and a subordinate joint command.<br />
<strong>The</strong> DSOA mission would be to prepare and conduct<br />
joint special operations. He envisioned the<br />
DSOA reporting directly to the secretary of defense.<br />
Command and control would be exercised<br />
through the subordinate joint command. 42<br />
Under Cohen’s vision, all Army, Navy, and Air<br />
Force SOF assets would be assigned to the new<br />
joint command, which would maintain liaison<br />
elements within each of the unified commands.<br />
During periods of conflict the joint command<br />
would forward deploy to the wartime theater and<br />
serve as that CINC’s special operations command.<br />
On the civilian side an assistant secretary<br />
of defense for special operations would provide<br />
the civilian control necessary to conduct politically<br />
sensitive special operations. 43 As Senator<br />
Cohen and Representative Daniel developed<br />
their proposals during the first half of 1986, Patterson’s<br />
Forward Look proposal had worked its<br />
way through the Air Staff.<br />
Gen Duane H. Cassidy, CINCMAC, approved<br />
most of Patterson’s Forward Look concept on 30<br />
December 1985. Planning had proceeded at MAC<br />
headquarters during early 1986 on the reorganization<br />
of the Twenty-Third AF, and on 13 March<br />
General Cassidy wrote to the Air Force vice chief<br />
of staff providing details of Forward Look. In his<br />
executive summary, CINCMAC reviewed the organizational<br />
history of the Twenty-Third AF. He<br />
noted that when the new numbered air force was<br />
activated, the ARRS was assigned to it to oversee<br />
all rescue assets, and 2d AD was established as a<br />
parallel umbrella organization over Air Force special<br />
operations forces. On 1 October 1983, how -<br />
ever, ARRS flying squadrons began reporting directly<br />
to the Twenty-Third AF, thus leaving only<br />
the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center reporting<br />
to ARRS. This change eliminated the need, in<br />
the opinion of MAC and the Twenty-Third AF, for<br />
an intermediate level of command between SOF<br />
and the Twenty-Third AF. General Cassidy concluded<br />
that the time had come to deactivate 2d<br />
AD and merge the capabilities of both combat rescue<br />
and SOF into one cohesive command. 44<br />
In an attachment to CINCMAC’s letter, a proposal<br />
was made to integrate special operations<br />
and combat rescue forces to provide a force multiplier<br />
and an organizational structure for SOF<br />
paralleling that of the CINCs they supported.<br />
Four CINCs had formed special operations subunified<br />
commands—Special Operations Commands<br />
Europe, Pacific, Central, and Atlantic (SOCEUR,<br />
SOCPAC, SOCCENT, and SOCLANT)—while<br />
Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) had established<br />
a Joint Special Operations Task Force<br />
(JSOTF) until it could establish a subunified<br />
command. General Cassidy supported having the<br />
1st SOW tasked against SOCCENT, SOCLANT,<br />
SOUTHCOM’s JSOTF, and the commander,<br />
JSOC requirements. <strong>The</strong> overseas wings would<br />
support SOCPAC and SOCEUR. In his letter<br />
General Cassidy also deleted the SAW designation<br />
for the four-wing Forward Look plan, preferring<br />
to retain the traditional SOW designation. 45<br />
Although the details of Forward Look were becoming<br />
known in the SOF community, the official<br />
position taken by MAC was to keep the plan<br />
closemouthed and to brief only selected commanders<br />
and their staffs. On 17 June 1986 the Twenty-<br />
Third AF advised 2d AD, the 1st SOW, and the<br />
39th Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Wing (the<br />
European-designated SOF wing) that Headquarters<br />
MAC had agreed to allow the Twenty-Third AF to<br />
brief selected personnel in their commands on<br />
Forward Look. Only senior 2d AD personnel and<br />
wing staff officers, along with squadron commanders<br />
and their operations officers, would be<br />
briefed. <strong>The</strong> briefing was given to Hurlburt Field<br />
units on 19 June and to the 39th ARRW the next<br />
day. <strong>The</strong> Forward Look briefing went into considerable<br />
detail on the reorganization, its goals, aircraft<br />
reassignments, and organizational changes.<br />
It emphasized combat capability based on integrated<br />
missions by multimission aircraft, responsive<br />
theater structures, organization that could<br />
accommodate future growth, and the Twenty-<br />
Third AF mission. By the fourth quarter of 1988,<br />
the Twenty-Third AF hoped to have the new organization<br />
up and operating. 46<br />
Concurrent with the 39th ARRW briefing at<br />
Eglin AFB on 20 June, Headquarters MAC advised<br />
the Twenty-Third AF that the Air Force<br />
Council had concurred with the reorganization<br />
302