06.03.2015 Views

1 - The Black Vault

1 - The Black Vault

1 - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRAETORIAN STARSHIP<br />

1986: <strong>The</strong> Goldwater–Nichols<br />

Defense Reorganization Act<br />

Representative Daniel’s article had accomplished<br />

its primary goal—it created dialogue<br />

within Congress and the Department of Defense<br />

on ways to improve special operations. In January<br />

1986 Sen. William Cohen, in an article published<br />

in Armed Forces Journal International, “A Defense<br />

Special Operations Agency: Fix for a SOF<br />

Capability That Is Most Assuredly Broken,”<br />

called for a national special operations agency. He<br />

outlined an organization that he named the Defense<br />

Special Operations Agency (DSOA), which<br />

would be made up of two major components—an<br />

agency staff and a subordinate joint command.<br />

<strong>The</strong> DSOA mission would be to prepare and conduct<br />

joint special operations. He envisioned the<br />

DSOA reporting directly to the secretary of defense.<br />

Command and control would be exercised<br />

through the subordinate joint command. 42<br />

Under Cohen’s vision, all Army, Navy, and Air<br />

Force SOF assets would be assigned to the new<br />

joint command, which would maintain liaison<br />

elements within each of the unified commands.<br />

During periods of conflict the joint command<br />

would forward deploy to the wartime theater and<br />

serve as that CINC’s special operations command.<br />

On the civilian side an assistant secretary<br />

of defense for special operations would provide<br />

the civilian control necessary to conduct politically<br />

sensitive special operations. 43 As Senator<br />

Cohen and Representative Daniel developed<br />

their proposals during the first half of 1986, Patterson’s<br />

Forward Look proposal had worked its<br />

way through the Air Staff.<br />

Gen Duane H. Cassidy, CINCMAC, approved<br />

most of Patterson’s Forward Look concept on 30<br />

December 1985. Planning had proceeded at MAC<br />

headquarters during early 1986 on the reorganization<br />

of the Twenty-Third AF, and on 13 March<br />

General Cassidy wrote to the Air Force vice chief<br />

of staff providing details of Forward Look. In his<br />

executive summary, CINCMAC reviewed the organizational<br />

history of the Twenty-Third AF. He<br />

noted that when the new numbered air force was<br />

activated, the ARRS was assigned to it to oversee<br />

all rescue assets, and 2d AD was established as a<br />

parallel umbrella organization over Air Force special<br />

operations forces. On 1 October 1983, how -<br />

ever, ARRS flying squadrons began reporting directly<br />

to the Twenty-Third AF, thus leaving only<br />

the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center reporting<br />

to ARRS. This change eliminated the need, in<br />

the opinion of MAC and the Twenty-Third AF, for<br />

an intermediate level of command between SOF<br />

and the Twenty-Third AF. General Cassidy concluded<br />

that the time had come to deactivate 2d<br />

AD and merge the capabilities of both combat rescue<br />

and SOF into one cohesive command. 44<br />

In an attachment to CINCMAC’s letter, a proposal<br />

was made to integrate special operations<br />

and combat rescue forces to provide a force multiplier<br />

and an organizational structure for SOF<br />

paralleling that of the CINCs they supported.<br />

Four CINCs had formed special operations subunified<br />

commands—Special Operations Commands<br />

Europe, Pacific, Central, and Atlantic (SOCEUR,<br />

SOCPAC, SOCCENT, and SOCLANT)—while<br />

Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) had established<br />

a Joint Special Operations Task Force<br />

(JSOTF) until it could establish a subunified<br />

command. General Cassidy supported having the<br />

1st SOW tasked against SOCCENT, SOCLANT,<br />

SOUTHCOM’s JSOTF, and the commander,<br />

JSOC requirements. <strong>The</strong> overseas wings would<br />

support SOCPAC and SOCEUR. In his letter<br />

General Cassidy also deleted the SAW designation<br />

for the four-wing Forward Look plan, preferring<br />

to retain the traditional SOW designation. 45<br />

Although the details of Forward Look were becoming<br />

known in the SOF community, the official<br />

position taken by MAC was to keep the plan<br />

closemouthed and to brief only selected commanders<br />

and their staffs. On 17 June 1986 the Twenty-<br />

Third AF advised 2d AD, the 1st SOW, and the<br />

39th Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Wing (the<br />

European-designated SOF wing) that Headquarters<br />

MAC had agreed to allow the Twenty-Third AF to<br />

brief selected personnel in their commands on<br />

Forward Look. Only senior 2d AD personnel and<br />

wing staff officers, along with squadron commanders<br />

and their operations officers, would be<br />

briefed. <strong>The</strong> briefing was given to Hurlburt Field<br />

units on 19 June and to the 39th ARRW the next<br />

day. <strong>The</strong> Forward Look briefing went into considerable<br />

detail on the reorganization, its goals, aircraft<br />

reassignments, and organizational changes.<br />

It emphasized combat capability based on integrated<br />

missions by multimission aircraft, responsive<br />

theater structures, organization that could<br />

accommodate future growth, and the Twenty-<br />

Third AF mission. By the fourth quarter of 1988,<br />

the Twenty-Third AF hoped to have the new organization<br />

up and operating. 46<br />

Concurrent with the 39th ARRW briefing at<br />

Eglin AFB on 20 June, Headquarters MAC advised<br />

the Twenty-Third AF that the Air Force<br />

Council had concurred with the reorganization<br />

302

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!