11.07.2015 Views

TABLE OF CONTENTS - The Professional Green Building Council

TABLE OF CONTENTS - The Professional Green Building Council

TABLE OF CONTENTS - The Professional Green Building Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong>me B: Creating a livable, healthy and environmentally viable citiesmobility and density. Using Zahavi’s temporal conjecture, the reduction inpopulation density is due to increased travel speed.He hypothesised that the daily time-budget average is constant and equal toapproximately one hour in all cities and that this time factor will remain unchangedover time. <strong>The</strong> impact of this time-budget constant on the relationship betweeneconomic growth and mobility is particularly important as it indicates that, shouldit continue, the more economic development provides rapid modes of transport, themore these will be used within the limit of just over one hour a day. According tothis logic, it is the access to higher speeds that has permitted the expansion of theurban sprawl. <strong>The</strong> time-budget constant means that the more we can travel at highspeed, the more distance we consume. Speed is therefore a “pivotal variable”linking the number of kilometres covered and the transport time-budget anddefines the population density of agglomerations.<strong>The</strong> other constant proposed by Zahavi is that of monetary budgets. <strong>The</strong> monetarybudget of households also represents a limit to the city’s expansion. <strong>The</strong> temporaland economic limits of the city make it necessary to consider the cost of speed todefine the mobility behaviour patterns of city inhabitants. <strong>The</strong> movement distancesaccessible within a one hour per day time limit and within a budget proportional toincome define the urban land take. However, they provide little informationconcerning the structure of the city. Inherited from the past, the various fabricsforming the city structure result from successive modes of mobility 1 and theirspecific speeds, as well as the density of interactions permitted by the urban fabric.Three types of city successively developed to match the dominant mode oftransport, which changed from walking to public transport and then to theautomobile. Cities with a long history present hybrid forms. <strong>The</strong> history ofEuropean cities implies that they are not totally dependent on the automobile.Other modes of transport continue more or less to operate. In the 1970s, Schaeffer& Sclar [6] established an analysis framework to understand changes in urban416

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!