TABLE OF CONTENTS - The Professional Green Building Council

Theme B: Creating a livable, healthy and environmentally viable citiescase of ordinary multi-family housing, the survey expanded the scope of thefacilities to those within the complexes, these results were produced, drawing ourkeen attention to the issue.Table 4. T-test of residents’ satisfaction with health in connection with semi public spacesOverallDwellers’occupancytime and thecontrol offloor area(after2002/20-40pyeong infloor area)Item Building type N Mean Sig.Physical activitySuper high-rise mixed-usehousing120 3.875Ordinary multi-familyhousing119 2.268**0.000Releasing stressSuper high-rise mixed-usehousing120 3.341Ordinary multi-familyhousing119 2.184**0.000Super high-rise mixed-usePsychologicalhousing120 3.275stability Ordinary multi-familyhousing118 2.245**0.000Physical activitySuper high-rise mixed-usehousing44 3.614Ordinary multi-familyhousing60 2.500**0.000Releasing stressSuper high-rise mixed-usehousing44 3.023Ordinary multi-familyhousing60 2.300**0.001Super high-rise mixed-usePsychologicalhousing44 2.886stability Ordinary multi-familyhousing60 2.400*0.011InteractionThe survey conducted a comparative analysis of residents’ satisfaction with theirinteraction with neighbors in super high-rise mixed-use housing and ordinarymulti-family housing, indicating that residents in ordinary multi-family housingknew names of more of their neighbors. There was a minimal difference in levels –thus no significance - of residents’ satisfaction with their participation in events,and their satisfaction with their friendly interaction with neighbors between insuper high-rise mixed-use housing and ordinary multi-family housing, indicatingthat there is little difference in residents’ interaction with their neighbors through560