TABLE OF CONTENTS - The Professional Green Building Council

Theme B: Creating a livable, healthy and environmentally viable citiescase of super high-rise mixed-use housing may be narrow, relaxation spaces maybe limited, and comfort may be lowered. This suggests that, with these physicalconditions, it is important to diversify facilities in external spaces and createcomfortable spaces.Table 2. Partial correlation between physical quality of common spaces in super high-risemixed-use housing, and residents’ well-beingComfortabilityDiversitySizeAccessibilitySafety/Health Interaction LeisureOutdoorSecurityr 0.352 0.111 0.145 0.323 0.305** 0.00Sig. 0.253 0.133** 0.001** 0.0010r 0.027 -0.011 0.015 -0.081 0.228Sig. 0.781 0.910 0.881 0.407* 0.018r 0.072 0.176 0.123 -0.028 0.013Sig. 0.461 0.068 0.204 0.776 0.895r 0.110 0.093 0.208 0.147 -0.083Sig. 0.257 0.336 * 0.031 0.129 0.3947.3 Comparative analysis of residents’ satisfaction7.3.1 Overall SatisfactionThe biggest difference in physical characteristics of semi-public spaces betweensuper high-rise mixed-use and ordinary multi-family housing is that, in thecategories of semi-public spaces’ diversity, comfort, scale and accessibility,residents in super high-rise mixed-use housing evaluated the physical quality oftheir semi-public spaces as superior than those in ordinary multi-family housingdid. Semi-public spaces in super high-rise mixed-use housing earned over 3.5points in all categories, while those in ordinary multi-family housing earned below3.0 points, an average, indicating a distinctive difference in the physical quality ofsemi-public spaces.557