11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130<strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>, <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>E. coli O157:H7 has been associated with large outbreaks of human infection <strong>and</strong>sporadic infections in almost all regions of the world (Cooley et al. 2007, Bell et al.1994, Yukioka & Kurita 1997, Effler et al. 2001, Machino et al. 1999, Dundas et al.2001). In the USA, Canada <strong>and</strong> the United Kingdom regional differences in rates ofE. coli O157:H7 infection have been noted (Innocent et al. 2005, Gould et al. 2009,<strong>Water</strong>s et al. 2004, Michel et al. 1999) ranging from 10 cases per 100,000population per year. E. coli O157:H7 infections have been associated with a varietyof food products including ground beef, unpasteurized dairy products, raw fieldvegetables, radish sprouts <strong>and</strong> fruit juices (Erickson & Doyle 2007). In addition,outbreaks of human infections have been associated with recreational <strong>and</strong>drinking-water. In Walkerton, Ontario, Canada contamination of well watercontributing to the town water supply <strong>and</strong> a failure in the chlorination system resultedin over 2300 illnesses, 28 cases of HUS <strong>and</strong> 7 deaths (Auld et al. 2004). In Swazil<strong>and</strong>an estimated 42,000 individuals suffered from E. coli O157 infections as a result ofcontaminated river water (Effler et al. 2001).Cattle <strong>and</strong> E. coli O157:H7 infections in humansThe primary source of the pathogen in most of these food- <strong>and</strong> environment-associateddisease cases is thought to have been ruminant faeces. Cattle <strong>and</strong> other ruminants arethought to be natural hosts of E. coli O157:H7; however, they are not associated withclinical disease in this animal reservoir. The linkage between E. coli O157:H7infection in cattle <strong>and</strong> humans is based on a number of lines of evidence: (1) Eatingof undercooked ground beef <strong>and</strong> unpasteurized milk are risk factors for acquiring E.coli O157:H7 infections, (2) E. coli O157 infections occur more frequently in regionswith high cattle density (Michel et al. 1999), (3) Argentina has the highest rate ofHUS <strong>and</strong> the highest beef consumption per capita, <strong>and</strong> cultural practices such asfeeding raw beef juice (“jugo de carne”) to infants have been associated with HUS(Rivas et al. 2008), <strong>and</strong> (4) isolates of the pathogen from outbreaks of human illnesshave been shown to share the same molecular fingerprint as epidemiologically linkedcattle isolates (Louie et al. 1999).Control of E. coli O157:H7 in cattleA significant amount of attention has been focused on control of E. coli O157:H7 inslaughter houses, beef processing plants, restaurants <strong>and</strong> at home by bothgovernments <strong>and</strong> industry in a number of developed economies (Gannon 1999). Thisarose from clear evidence that E. coli O157:H7 from ground beef was associated withhuman disease, threats of litigation <strong>and</strong> trade restrictions, loss of consumer confidence<strong>and</strong> significant costs to industry associated with the recall of millions of tons ofcontaminated ground beef. Measures adopted to control the pathogen included the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!