11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

334<strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>, <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>complicate interpretation from the regulatory st<strong>and</strong>point, which focuses on FIOdensity-based classification. And while a recent field study reported a lowcorrelation between quantitative Bacteroidales markers <strong>and</strong> FIOs, there was agood correlation between indicator <strong>and</strong> Bacteroidales delivery flux (Stapletonet al. 2009). Other studies report a good correlation between FIOs <strong>and</strong>Bacteroidales markers directly (Shanks et al. 2006). These differences are likelyto be caused by some combination of differential survival between host-specificmarkers <strong>and</strong> FIOs, low/varied levels of faecal contamination, or geographicvariation in the prevalence of markers.Since the purpose of recreational water quality regulation is primarily to protecthuman health, the extent to which host-specific markers are able to predict theoccurrence of human pathogens may be of greater importance than theircorrelation to FIOs ((Field & Samadpour 2007). A study in Alberta, Canada,compared the occurrence of human, ruminant <strong>and</strong> pig-specific Bacteroidalesmarkers with the pathogens (Campylobacter, Salmonella, <strong>and</strong> E. coli O157:H7)<strong>and</strong> found a positive relationship between a Bacteroidales general marker<strong>and</strong> pathogens (Walters & Field 2006). The detection of ruminant-specificBacteroidales markers also predicted E. coli O157:H7 occurrence <strong>and</strong> there wasa significant increase in the probability of detecting Salmonella when ruminantmarkers were also present. Another Canadian study which compared theoccurrence of human-, ruminant- <strong>and</strong> porcine-specific Bacteroidales markers inwater samples to the occurrence of FIOs, thermotolerant Campylobacter,Salmonella, <strong>and</strong> shigatoxin genes yielded similar results (Fremaux et al. 2009),with elevated E. coli counts related to the presence of human <strong>and</strong>ruminant markers. Furthermore, ruminant marker CF128 was predictive ofthe presence of Salmonella spp (Fremaux et al. 2009). In addition toBacteroidales, some studies have reported good predictive value betweencoliphages <strong>and</strong> the presence of human viruses (Ogorzaly et al. 2009) <strong>and</strong>between FIOs, coliphages, <strong>and</strong> enteroviruses (Costan-Longares et al. 2008).Neither Bacteroidales nor coliphages as a single indicator proved suitable forpredicting Cryptosporidium oocysts through the wastewater treatment chain(Costan-Longares et al. 2008).It has been suggested that a combination of bacterial <strong>and</strong> phage indicators isnecessary to ensure the microbial quality of reclaimed water (Costan-Longareset al. 2008). In a New York river system study (examining microbial fate,transport <strong>and</strong> partitioning) Cryptosporidium <strong>and</strong> Giardia demonstrated a greaterassociation to particulate matter than FIOs, although settling rates were similar(Cizek et al. 2008). The correlation between these organisms <strong>and</strong> FIO was,however, weak in this study as well as in others (Savichtcheva & Okabe 2006,Field & Samadpour 2007, Cizek et al. 2008). Faecal indicators organisms, such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!