11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

288<strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>, <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>8.2.3 Alternative or secondary indicators of faecalcontaminationSurvival rates of microbiological pathogens vary from organism to organism<strong>and</strong> are influenced by environmental conditions (see: Chapter 7). This paradigmalso holds true for pathogens associated with manure from domestic animals<strong>and</strong> livestock (Pachepsky et al. 2006). As a result, a single indicator organism isunlikely to reliably predict the presence of all enteric pathogens for all typesof waters <strong>and</strong> faecal contamination associated with different hosts (Hörmanet al. 2004). The application of combined conventional <strong>and</strong> alternativeindicators <strong>and</strong>/or methods of detecting faecal contamination increases sensitivity<strong>and</strong> specificity <strong>and</strong> may enhance the ability to predict <strong>and</strong> reduce health riskassociated with the use of surface waters (Savichtcheva & Okabe 2006).Alternative or secondary indicators (see: Chapter 9) may include faecalanaerobes (Bacteriodales/ Bacteroides spp., Bifidobacterium spp. <strong>and</strong>Clostridium perfringens), viral indicators (Bacteroides fragilis bacteriophage<strong>and</strong> F-specific RNA coliphage), chemical compounds (caffeine, opticalbrighteners <strong>and</strong> faecal sterols) <strong>and</strong> many other anthropogenic markers associatedwith human activity (Leeming et al. 1996, Calci et al. 1998, Gardinali &Zhao 2002, Scott et al. 2002, Hörman et al. 2004, Savichtcheva & Okabe2006, Schulz et al. 2006, Sobsey et al. 2006, Cao et al. 2009). Sourceattribution employing the combined use of traditional <strong>and</strong> secondary oralternative faecal indicators is often referred to as microbial source tracking(MST) (Bitton 2005).8.2.4 Source attribution (microbial source tracking, MST)In addition to alternative faecal indicators, MST is increasingly informed by the useof modern techniques taken from molecular biology, such as DNA fingerprintingby polymerase chain reaction (PCR), developing assay, or antigen electrochemicalrapid methods (Jones & Smith 2004, Ruecker et al. 2007). The aim of MST is toidentify the original host animal group(s) of faecal bacteria found in water. Forexample, this could be at the human or animal level (ruminant, non-ruminant),or to elucidate the contributions from specific animal groups for example, cow,sheep, dog, or avian species. A variety of faecal bacteria exist. Those typicallyused for regulatory purposes (e.g. E. coli or intestinal enterococci) have at leastsome properties of indicators, <strong>and</strong> as such allude to the possible presence ofpathogens. The only way to be certain that MST data relate directly to the faecalbacteria used for regulation would be to attribute those same bacteria to a hostsource. However, to date, methods to obtain MST information directly from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!