11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

170<strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>, <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>Interestingly, this study reported flow effects on FIO concentrations in sewageeffluents <strong>and</strong> the results are split into dry weather conditions <strong>and</strong> response torainfall events. Table 5.5 provides details on the sample numbers for each typeof treatment <strong>and</strong> Table 5.6 provides results of the FIO concentrations in thedifferent treatment systems by flow condition.Table 5.5 Types of sewage treatment/effluent reported in Kay et al. (2008).Level of treatment aSpecific effluent types aUntreated sewage (69) Crude sewage discharges (16)Storm sewage overflows b (53)Primary treatment (12) Primary settled sewage effluent (7)Stored settled sewage effluent (2)Settled septic tank effluent (3)Secondary treatment (67) Trickling filter effluent (38)Activated sludge effluent c (17)Oxidation ditch effluent (3)Trickling/s<strong>and</strong> filter effluent (1)Rotating biological contactor effluent (8)Tertiary treatment (14) Reedbed/grass plot effluent (6)Ultraviolet-disinfected effluent (8)a Figures in brackets indicate number of different treatment plants sampled (numbers of validenumerations (n) are shown in Table 5.6).b Specificeffluent types comprise treatment plant inlet overflows, stormwater retention tankoverflows <strong>and</strong> combined sewer overflows (CSOs); high-flow data only.c Activated sludge effluent includes deep-shaft activated sludge effluent at one site.5.4 MICROBIAL TRANSPORTBoth Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act TMDL investigations <strong>and</strong> EU <strong>Water</strong> Framework Directive(WFD) Programmes of Measures require information at the drainage basin scale.There has been work at this scale on the impacts of l<strong>and</strong> use on stream FIOconcentration <strong>and</strong> transport.Bales et al. (1995) examined phage (a viral tracer) <strong>and</strong> FIO transport in anaquifer at Cape Cod, USA <strong>and</strong> reported phage attenuation higher than that forthe bacteria. The phages were easily remobilised, however, by enhanced flowwhich suggests continued viability whilst adsorbed to the s<strong>and</strong>y aquifer matrix.Sinton et al. (2005) reported vertical microbial tracer transport from areas ofslurry spreading to a 16.8 m deep aquifer in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. The breakthroughcurves suggested travel speeds of between 15.7 <strong>and</strong> 39.2 m.hr −1 . The tracers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!