11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40<strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>, <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>E. coli O157:H7 is able to survive for longer periods in sediments than inflowing water. It is thought that biological agents such as bactivorous protozoadecrease free living or planktonic E. coli O157 numbers <strong>and</strong> biofilm formationin sediments increases its long-term survival (Wang & Doyle 1998; Ravva et al.2010). Despite this, large waterborne disease outbreaks have been associatedwith the organism. One of the largest of these occurred in Swazil<strong>and</strong> wherecattle manure was thought to be the source of more than 40,000 cases ofwaterborne infection with the organism (Effler et al. 2001). Another largewaterborne outbreak occurred in May of 2000 in Walkerton, Ontario, Canadawhen heavy rains lead to the contamination of a municipal well with cattlemanure (Garg et al. 2006). This event, coupled with a failure of the townchlorination system, led to 2500 cases of illness <strong>and</strong> seven deaths in this smallcommunity. In addition to the acute effects of infection with the organism suchas haemorrhagic colitis <strong>and</strong> HUS, residents of Walkteron have been shown tohave suffered from long-term sequelae following infection such as higher ratesof irritable bowel syndrome, hypertension, renal impairment <strong>and</strong> cardiovasculardisease (Clark et al. 2010). In the USA, 10 waterborne outbreaks associatedwith EHEC E. coli O157:H7 <strong>and</strong> O145:NM were reported between 1971–2006(Craun et al. 2010). In the Scotl<strong>and</strong>, water consumed by vacationers wasreported to be associated with an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak (Licence et al.2001). In Irel<strong>and</strong>, a case control study pointed to a private well water source asbeing the cause of an E. coli O157 outbreak in a child care facility (Mannexet al. 2007). Most if not all E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks related to drinking-wateroccur with water derived from small systems such as private wells wherethere is no chlorination or there has been a chlorination failure (Craun et al.2010; Smith et al.2006). In a number of these outbreaks <strong>and</strong> in sporadic caseshigh resolution molecular typing methods such as pulsed-field gelelectrophoresis <strong>and</strong> comparative genomic fingerprinting (Laing et al. 2008) haveverified the close relationship between isolates from cattle, water <strong>and</strong> humans<strong>and</strong> provided very strong evidence for the waterborne transmission of E. coliO157 (Bruce et al. 2003, Effler et al. 2001, Mannix et al. 2007, Jokinen et al.2011).The prevalence of EHEC infections varies significantly from country tocountry <strong>and</strong> among regions within countries (20 cases per 100,000population members). While some of this difference can be attributed todifferences in surveillance <strong>and</strong> diagnostic abilities among countries, differencesin rates of infection also appear to be related to cattle density, the level of beefconsumption <strong>and</strong> cultural practises which promote consumption of uncooked orundercooked beef, e.g. HUS rates <strong>and</strong> beef consumption per capita in Argentinaare amongst the highest in the world (Rivas et al. 2008). Regional differences in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!