11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

308<strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>, <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>Lessons for the futurePrediction <strong>and</strong> signage systems have been shown to work <strong>and</strong> can provide timely adviceto beach users. The system can be extended to suitable bathing waters where waterquality prediction relationships can be modelled <strong>and</strong> validated.Multi-parameter statistic tools, such as decision trees, are currently being tested <strong>and</strong>are looking promising for future use as they provide more sophisticated detection ofcombined influences such as rain, wind <strong>and</strong> tide together. In addition, data inputsfrom catchment rain radar will provide better spatial coverage in t<strong>and</strong>em with moreaccurate weather forecasts allowing in-day adjustments of the predictions. Marketresearch, carried out during the initial development to gauge public perception <strong>and</strong>feedback, was positive. It is worth repeating this at suitable intervals to assess trends<strong>and</strong> obtain feedback from beach users to ensure that public information toolsare relevant.SEPA are planning to extend the system by adding this “nowcast” risk assessed forabout 15 more beaches to be fully operational in the course of 2012. In addition toproviding public information at appropriate locations this will be an operational toolto facilitate beach management of short term pollution events as required for therevised EU Bathing <strong>Water</strong>s Directive (2006/07/EC).8.6 FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN RISK ASSESSMENTCAPABILITIESApplication of molecular techniques <strong>and</strong> multiple water quality indicators withvariable environmental persistence <strong>and</strong> fate may yield greater confidence in faecalpollution assessment <strong>and</strong> may better inform remediation decisions (Haack et al.2008). In a study by Haack et al. (2008) bacterial genes indicated potential pig orcattle sources in eight of 18 samples from mixed or agricultural l<strong>and</strong>-usewatersheds where pigs <strong>and</strong> cattle were present. Molecular epidemiological studieswere also applied in endemic areas of the Peruvian Amazon to examine thedensity <strong>and</strong> diversity of Leptospira spp. in urban <strong>and</strong> rural environmental watersamples. The outcome was the discovery of a new branch of the leptospiralphylogenetic tree, an important step in further identifying potential sources so thatfurther virulence <strong>and</strong> general characterization studies can be performed (Haake2006). Another significant advantage of some molecular techniques, such asreal-time quantitative PCR (QPCR), is the ability to enumerate pathogens inenvironmental samples. This is critical for the determination whether or not anorganism is present in an infectious dose. In a Racine, WI, USA study the carriagerate for Campylobacter spp. in urbanized gull populations at popular bathingbeaches was noted to be 14 percent but this was not quantified with respect to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!