11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84<strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>, <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>Beef <strong>and</strong> dairy cattle have been shown to be commonly infected with Giardiaduodenalis (Buret et al. 1990; Deshp<strong>and</strong>e & Shastri 1981, O’H<strong>and</strong>ley et al. 1999,Olson et al. 1997a, Olson et al.1997b, Paul et al. 2009, Quilez et al. 1996,Taminelli & Eckert 1989, Xiao et al. 1993, Wade et al. 2000). It would appear,however, that the majority of infections in cattle are of Assemblage E(non-zoonotic) <strong>and</strong> a smaller percentage of Assemblage A (human infective).Recent studies by Trout et al. (2004 through 2007) have shown that 13% to15%, 3%, <strong>and</strong> 2% of calves, yearlings, <strong>and</strong> adult dairy cows, respectively, wereshedding cysts of Assemblage A. The prevalence rate of faecal shedding ofAssemblage E is much higher than that of Assemblage A, which may have ledearly investigators <strong>and</strong> public health officials to over-estimate the importance oflivestock as a source of zoonotic Giardia duodenalis. Young cattle exhibithigher prevalence rates of faecal shedding compared to adult cattle. Forexample, previous studies have found that the prevalence rate of Giardiaduodenalis shedding for beef <strong>and</strong> dairy calves ranges from 17 to 55% <strong>and</strong> foradult beef <strong>and</strong> dairy cattle from 0 to 17% (Fayer et al. 2000, Wade et al. 2000,Huetink et al. 2001, Appelbee et al. 2003, McAllister et al. 2005, Gow &Waldner 2006). A survey of 22 feedlots in seven states in the USA (California,Washington, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska, <strong>and</strong> South Dakota) found19% (1006/5260) of fresh faecal pats with detectable Giardia duodenalis cysts,with higher prevalence rates among recent arrivals <strong>and</strong> during winter timeconditions (Hoar et al. 2009). The arithmetic mean intensity for the positivefaecal pats was ∼10,700 cysts/g faeces (Figure 3.2), or ∼2030 cysts/g faecesfor the entire sample of faecals (positives <strong>and</strong> negatives) from across middle <strong>and</strong>western US feedlots, with a small subset of samples exhibiting >500,000cysts/g faeces (super-shedders). Assuming feedlot steers defecate between 10<strong>and</strong> 40 kg, this would generate an environmental loading rate between 2 × 10 7<strong>and</strong> 8 × 10 7 cysts per animal per day. About 34% (168/495) of Canadian beefcalves had detectable Giardia duodenalis cysts, but almost all isolates were nothuman infective (Applebee et al. 2003). In an earlier study, faecal samples fromcow-calf operations had a mean intensity of 5801 cysts/g faeces (Heitman et al.2002). Approximately 25% of sheep <strong>and</strong> 36% of goats in Belgium were foundpositive for Giardia duodenalis, with a mean intensity of ∼4600 <strong>and</strong> ∼18,000cysts/g faeces, respectively (not adjusted for % recovery) (Geurden et al. 2008).Assuming adult sheep produce 0.7 kg faeces per day, this would generate amean daily environmental loading rate of 3.2 × 10 6 cysts per sheep per day.Interested readers are encouraged to read recent reviews to better underst<strong>and</strong>the ongoing challenge of establishing a definitive role for livestock as a causeof human giardiasis (Thompson & Monis 2004, Hunter & Thompson 2005,Slifko et al. 2000).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!