11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>, <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>This will be the second book in the series on “Emerging issues in water <strong>and</strong>infectious disease” to deal with issues related to zoonoses; in part in recognitionof the fact that the majority, around 75%, of emerging <strong>and</strong> re-emergingpathogens are zoonotic. The first book, “<strong>Water</strong>-borne Zoonoses” (Cotruvo et al.2004), which complements this volume, focused on three questions:• The nature of waterborne zoonotic disease threats;• Identification of new disease c<strong>and</strong>idates; <strong>and</strong>,• Adequacy of existing control measures.In contrast this volume focuses on:• The adequacy of the evidence base for policy;• The appropriateness <strong>and</strong> effectiveness of present regulatory responses; <strong>and</strong>,• Opportunities for effective low-cost regulation <strong>and</strong> management of actual<strong>and</strong> potential health risks.For the purposes of assessment, management <strong>and</strong> regulation, the issue consists ofthree principal components: the source (animal excreta), its transport (i.e. transferto, survival in <strong>and</strong> movement through watercourses); <strong>and</strong> resulting humanexposure. All three can be the object of interventions.This report, therefore, reflects on underst<strong>and</strong>ing what are the assessment,managerial <strong>and</strong> regulatory challenges, the adequacy of present regulatoryapproaches, <strong>and</strong> the characteristics of a better system.For bathing waters the established approach was, for many years, retrospectivecompliance testing on an annual basis. However the 1999 “Annapolis Protocol”(WHO, 1999), associated World <strong>Health</strong> Organization’s Guidelines (WHO2003; 2006) <strong>and</strong> their implementation in associated developments (EU,New Zeal<strong>and</strong> 2003) show a strong shift towards prevention <strong>and</strong> real-timesupport for informed decision-making by members of the public. Thesedocuments also recognize, however, that health risks from zoonotic sources inabsolute terms or as compared with faecal indicators are inadequatelyunderstood <strong>and</strong> they are cautious in interpreting the associated risks, except inassuming that the risk presented by animal excreta is less than that fromhuman excreta.For drinking-water the shift to preventive management is more advanced, withdetectable changes in regulation <strong>and</strong>/or practice since the publication of the thirdedition of WHO’s Guidelines for Drinking-water <strong>Quality</strong> which recommended a“Framework for Drinking-water Safety” <strong>and</strong> associated “<strong>Water</strong> Safety Plans”(WHO 2004, reconfirmed in the fourth edition, WHO 2011). However, problemsremain of inadequate underst<strong>and</strong>ing of zoonotic risks <strong>and</strong> the inadequacy of faecalbacteria as indicators of risk.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!