11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Indicators, sanitary surveys <strong>and</strong> source attribution techniques 329Source attribution includes several methods which may have the ability todetermine whether faecal pollution is from human or non-human sources.Source tracking methods have successfully been applied to identify non-pointsource pollution responsible for the faecal contamination of water systems(reviewed in USEPA 2005). Methods for source attribution can be separatedinto three groups: molecular, biochemical <strong>and</strong> chemical. Many of the molecular<strong>and</strong> biochemical techniques have been applied or suggested for use in watershedstudies <strong>and</strong> have been summarized (Simpson et al. 2002, Meays et al. 2004,Field & Samadpour 2007, Sadowsky & Santo Domingo 2007, Santo Domingoet al. 2007, Stoeckel & Harwood 2007, Yan & Sadowsky 2007). One of theseapproaches focuses on detecting host-specific molecular markers using the16SrDNA gene of Bacteroides <strong>and</strong> the larger taxon, the Bacteriodales (Allsop& Sticker 1985, Fiksdal et al. 1985, Bernhard & Field, 2000a, 2000b, Dicket al. 2005). Bacteroidales constitutes one of the most numerous members of thehuman colonic flora. Known representatives are restricted to the gastrointestinaltract of warm-blooded animals <strong>and</strong>, unlike coliforms, this taxon makes up asignificant portion of faecal bacteria (Finegold et al. 1983, Sghir et al. 2000),comprising approximately 30 percent of the flora in the human gut (Sears 2005).The application of this method has been used to detect <strong>and</strong> differentiate human<strong>and</strong> ruminant sources of faecal pollution in the environment (Bernhard et al.2001, Lee et al. 2008, Reischer et al. 2008, Shanks et al. 2010).In addition to distinguishing between human <strong>and</strong> ruminant sources, DNAmarkers may also be employed to distinguish avian from human sources. In theupper mid-western United States, one library-independent study (see section 9.4.2below) used pooled genomic tester <strong>and</strong> driver DNAs in suppression subtractivehybridizations to enrich for host source-specific DNA markers for Escherichiacoli, originating from locally isolated geese (Hamilton et al. 2006). Whilesuccessful, this study results were applicable only to regional sources.Library-dependent MST efforts are also subject to regionalization for the bestresults (Stoeckel & Harwood 2007). A combination of both library-independent<strong>and</strong> library-dependent techniques may be necessary to provide the temporal <strong>and</strong>spatial acuity necessary to determine pollution sources (Edge et al. 2010).9.4.1 Chemical analysis (source tracking/water qualityindicators)In addition to MST techniques, chemical parameters have been used to identifyfaecal sources (reviewed in Scott et al. 2002, Meays et al. 2004, Hagedorn &Weisberg 2009). Caffeine <strong>and</strong> coprostanol are two markers which can be usedto confirm the presence of human sewage contaminated water. Caffeine is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!