11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Zoonotic waterborne pathogens in livestock 133pathogens. Diet-dependent, digestive processes also create physical <strong>and</strong> chemicalstress for the organisms. Therefore it is not surprising that certain zoonoticpathogen control efforts have focused on using these obstacles to tip theecological balance in the gastrointestinal tract in favour of the beneficialmicroflora <strong>and</strong> against the survival of pathogenic species.4.5.1 Prebiotics, probiotics <strong>and</strong> competitive exclusionDecades ago it was discovered that feeding the caecal contents of adult birds toyoung chicks makes them resistant to colonization with Salmonella (Rantala &Nurmi 1973), <strong>and</strong>, in contrast to the use of antimicrobials in feeds, inhibitoryeffects on the shedding of Salmonella persisted long after the treatment wasstopped. This method of combating Salmonella in poultry, called “competitiveexclusion,” became widely used in Finl<strong>and</strong> in their Salmonella controlprogramme. Hirn et al. (1992) reported that less than 5% of the Finnish poultryflocks were Salmonella-positive <strong>and</strong> that 70–80% of salmonellosis cases inhumans in Finl<strong>and</strong> were acquired abroad. Stern et al. (2001) in the USA alsoused anaerobic cultures derived from mucosal scraping of the intestines of adultchickens in competitive exclusion experiments <strong>and</strong> demonstrated that theircultures reduce Salmonella in the caeca of chickens as well as faecal sheddingof Campylobacter. However, attempts to control Campylobacter in poultryusing competitive exclusion have been less consistent.The biological basis of competitive exclusion is poorly understood; however, itmay be related to enhancing the immune function of the host, nutrient competitionamong bacteria, or the elaboration of toxic substances such as volatile fatty acids,antimicrobial peptides, or bacteriocins (Joerger 2003). Studies on bacterialpopulations also suggest that certain bacterial hormones allow “communication”among different bacterial species <strong>and</strong> may play a role in controlling populationlevels of specific bacterial species (a process called quorum sensing) forexample a recent report suggests that a common anaerobe in the humanintestine, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, can repress expression of Shiga toxinby E. coli O157:H7 (de Sablet et al. 2009).Cultures of micro-organisms that limit pathogenic bacterial populations in thegut have been termed probiotics. Other micro-organisms, such as lactobacilli <strong>and</strong>Bifidobacterium, <strong>and</strong> complex carbohydrates that promote the growth ofpopulations of these members of the normal gut flora have been extensivelystudied as agents to control faecal shedding of enteric bacterial pathogens suchas Salmonella in poultry (Stavric 1992, Gusils et al. 1999, Fern<strong>and</strong>ez et al.2002). The strategy of using probiotic bacteria is also being explored forcontrol of other bacterial pathogens in other animal species. Tkalcic et al.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!