11.07.2015 Views

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

Animal Waste, Water Quality and Human Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Indicators, sanitary surveys <strong>and</strong> source attribution techniques 331An ideal source attribution technique would be as easy <strong>and</strong> inexpensive asmonitoring for FIOs, rapidly providing reliable, quantitative <strong>and</strong>easy-to-interpret differential diagnoses of faecal sources. The results of an idealmethod should reflect the probability of the presence of human pathogens. Inorder for faecal source tracking methods to meet these criteria, the followingshould ideally be met (US EPA 2005, Harwood et al. 2007):• each identifiable host source must possess unique characteristics thatunequivocally distinguish it from other related or non-related sources(host-specific marker);• the even distribution of host-specific markers must be predictable amonghosts <strong>and</strong> have a similar environmental survival profile as host-specificmarkers from other species;• the identifying trait (host-specific marker) must be detectable in water atvarying concentrations;• the host-specific traits should have a similar distribution <strong>and</strong> environmentalsurvival profile as the FIO used to monitor that water body; <strong>and</strong>,• the host-specific markers should correlate well with pathogen presence, fate<strong>and</strong> transport in the aquatic environment.9.4.2 Limitations <strong>and</strong> challenges of faecal sourcetracking methodsFaecal source tracking, or MST, refers to the assignation of a pollutant source bytracing (fate <strong>and</strong> transport) or identifying a variety of microorganisms <strong>and</strong>/orchemicals back to their host (faecal source). Microbial source tracking mayemploy typical water quality indicators such as E. coli <strong>and</strong> enterococci as wellas secondary or alternative indicators as previously described (Table 9.1).Analytical methods vary widely <strong>and</strong> may include DNA “fingerprinting”, whichrefers to the analysis of patterns generated from the DNA of the organism <strong>and</strong>are generally performed on cultured isolates. DNA fingerprinting of faecalcoliforms, E. coli <strong>and</strong> faecal streptococci (enterococci) forms a subset of MST,one tool in a toolbox of potential methods (USEPA 2005). Other MST methodsthat do not require culturing are also discussed below.A variety of faecal bacteria, including traditional FIOs <strong>and</strong> other microbes,may lend themselves well to source attribution techniques <strong>and</strong> are the subjectof an extensive body of recently published literature. In order to estimaterelative contributions to a waterbody from an array of possible faecal sources,host-specific markers should have a distribution within their host <strong>and</strong>environmental survival profiles that mimic those of pathogens (USEPA 2005,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!