2.3 Yield Per Hectare of Agricultural <strong>Crop</strong>sTable 3 shows <strong>the</strong> average yield per hectare of agricultural crops. The average yieldper hectare of rice and corn is low at 2.6-2.9 metric tonnes per hectare and 1.2-1.6 metrictonnes per hectare, respectively. There is a cont<strong>in</strong>uous decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> yield of sugar cane.From a high of 81.8 metric tonnes per hectare <strong>in</strong> 1989 this decreased to only 52.5 metrictonnes per hectare <strong>in</strong> 1998, a decrease of about 35 percent.The average yield of mango and rubber is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. In mango, <strong>the</strong> average yield<strong>in</strong>creased from a mere 5 metric tonnes per hectare <strong>in</strong> 1989-1992 to 10 metric tonnes perhectare <strong>in</strong> 1997-1998. Rubber yield <strong>in</strong>creased from a low of 1.99 metric tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1989 to2.44 metric tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1998.2.4 Share of <strong>Crop</strong>s <strong>in</strong> National Agricultural GDP and TradeFrom 1992 to 1996, agriculture contributed 20.93-22.28 percent of <strong>the</strong> GDP. Lateststatistics show that <strong>in</strong> 1994-1998 (BAS, 1999) <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>e economy grew by an averageof 4.55 percent <strong>in</strong> terms of GNP or 3.92 percent <strong>in</strong> terms of GDP. The country’s economicperformance before 1998 had real growth <strong>in</strong> GDP from 4.39-5.85 percent. The <strong>region</strong>alcurrency crisis and adverse wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions <strong>in</strong> 1997-1998 greatly affected <strong>the</strong> economy.From Table 4, it is evident that <strong>the</strong> percent share of agriculture to GNP is decreas<strong>in</strong>gboth at current and constant prices. The Gross Value Added <strong>in</strong> agriculture has been<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (Table 5). However, <strong>the</strong> crops sector posted negative growth <strong>in</strong> 1990 and 1998,that is, -0.78 and -12.86, respectively.2.5 Trade of <strong>Crop</strong> ProductsTable 6 presents <strong>the</strong> agricultural foreign trade statistics from 1989 to 1998. The valueof agricultural imports was lower than <strong>the</strong> value of exports from 1989 to 1993. From 1994 to1998, however, <strong>the</strong> reverse can be noted.The volume of sugar exported is on <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e. This can be attributed to decreas<strong>in</strong>garea devoted to sugar production, lower production per unit area and high production cost.Likewise, decreas<strong>in</strong>g export volumes of desiccated coconut, coffee and copra are evident.However, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g export volumes can be noted <strong>in</strong> coconut oil, copra oil and banana.3. PATTERNS OF CROP DIVERSIFICATIONWith grow<strong>in</strong>g population, urbanization and <strong>in</strong>dustrialization, <strong>the</strong> area devoted to cropproduction has been decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. As a result, new strategies were formulated and cropdiversification is one of <strong>the</strong>se. As a strategy, crop diversification maximizes <strong>the</strong> use of landand optimizes farm productivity and <strong>in</strong>comes.There are several factors associated with crop diversification. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Gonzales(1989), <strong>the</strong> adoption of crop diversification schemes is dictated by both physical andeconomic factors. Physical factors <strong>in</strong>clude land capability, ra<strong>in</strong>fall patterns, water quality,crop suitability and technology. Economic factors, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>in</strong>clude costs, prices,97
markets, and economic viability of alternative cropp<strong>in</strong>g schemes (Adriano and Cabezon,1989).Farmers have shifted to rice-based farm<strong>in</strong>g systems due to constra<strong>in</strong>ts like <strong>in</strong>adequatewater, land suitability and climatic conditions (Obcemea et al., 1996). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>yattributed adoption of this scheme to <strong>in</strong>come stability, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand for non-rice crops,and high profitability per unit area.Francisco (1995) reported that three factors determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> farmer’s choice of ricecropp<strong>in</strong>g system. These are farmers’ technical knowledge <strong>in</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> crop, adaptabilityof <strong>the</strong> crop to <strong>the</strong> local conditions, and amount of resources available to f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>the</strong>production expenses. Aside from <strong>the</strong>se are market forces that affect prices of both <strong>the</strong> outputand <strong>in</strong>puts and level of government support extended to <strong>the</strong> cultivation of both major ando<strong>the</strong>r crops.3.1 <strong>Diversification</strong> <strong>in</strong> Rice Lands<strong>Diversification</strong> <strong>in</strong> rice lands started <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970’s when researchers began develop<strong>in</strong>gtechnologies and strategies for optimiz<strong>in</strong>g farm productivity (Galvez, 1990). Accord<strong>in</strong>g toAdriano and Cabezon (1989), diversification of specific non-rice crops <strong>in</strong> irrigated landsbegan only dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s. This government policy was adopted to raise farm<strong>in</strong>comes and <strong>in</strong>tensify employment opportunities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rural areas.The International Rice Research Institute (based <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>es) <strong>in</strong>itiated ricebasedcropp<strong>in</strong>g studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-1970’s (Miranda and Panabokke, 1989). This led to <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>troduction of crops o<strong>the</strong>r than rice dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dry season follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> wet season ricecrop.In <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed and upland areas of <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>the</strong>re are 25 rice-based patternswith rice as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> crop followed by ano<strong>the</strong>r crop (Adriano, 1989). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>National Agricultural Research and Extension Agenda (BAR, 1989), cropp<strong>in</strong>g patterns differby geographical location (Table 7).A wide range of crops can be grown after rice depend<strong>in</strong>g on ra<strong>in</strong>fall and availabilityof water, elevation and land features of <strong>the</strong> environment. Corn, tobacco, garlic, and legumesare <strong>the</strong> major crops after rice <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se four <strong>region</strong>s. In 1991-1995, ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice-basedcropp<strong>in</strong>g systems, namely, rice-corn, rice-garlic, rice-mungbean, rice-sweet pepper, and ricetomatowere evaluated <strong>in</strong> Ilocos Norte as part of <strong>the</strong> Ra<strong>in</strong>fed Lowland Rice ResearchConsortium implemented by Mariano Marcos State University, <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>e Rice ResearchInstitute (PhilRice) and IRRI (Obcemea et al., 1996; Yokohama et al., 1998).In a nationwide survey done by PhilRice <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last two years (unpublished), sixmajor cropp<strong>in</strong>g patters, namely, rice-rice, rice-vegetables, rice-fish, rice-corn, rice-legumes,and o<strong>the</strong>rs, were studied. The percentage of each cropp<strong>in</strong>g pattern was determ<strong>in</strong>ed asidefrom <strong>in</strong>formation such as area devoted to rice farm<strong>in</strong>g, number of rice farmers, averagelandhold<strong>in</strong>g, tenurial status, seed production area, and local problems <strong>in</strong> rice production.3.2 <strong>Diversification</strong> <strong>in</strong> Coconut Lands98
- Page 2 and 3:
RAP PUBLICATION: 2001/03CROP DIVERS
- Page 4 and 5:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THEASIA-PAC
- Page 6 and 7:
13. INTENSIFICATION OF CROP DIVERSI
- Page 8 and 9:
INTRODUCTORY REMARKSMinas K. Papade
- Page 10 and 11:
New opportunities that would benefi
- Page 12 and 13:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN BANGLADESHM
- Page 14 and 15:
(CDP) during 1990/95 in 125 Thanas
- Page 16 and 17:
SlName of Crops1 Aus:HYVLocalTable
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 4. Trade of Crops/products (I
- Page 20 and 21:
through development projects implem
- Page 22 and 23:
y the terminal year of the Fifth Pl
- Page 24 and 25:
cropping. This has only been possib
- Page 26 and 27:
process and export those labour int
- Page 28 and 29:
g) restoration/improvement of soil
- Page 30 and 31:
8. RECOMMENDATIONSConsidering the i
- Page 32 and 33:
enthusiasm of the farmers in their
- Page 34 and 35:
3.3 The Formation and Development o
- Page 36 and 37:
carried out for years, guarantees t
- Page 38 and 39:
environment protection. Special att
- Page 40 and 41:
2. CROP PRODUCTION AND ECONOMICS SC
- Page 42 and 43:
What is most notable is the change
- Page 44 and 45:
8.36 m/ha involved in the area shif
- Page 46 and 47:
fact that the area shares of the do
- Page 48 and 49:
country. Therefore, a judicious use
- Page 50 and 51:
5.3 Emerging Technology and Crop Di
- Page 52 and 53:
7. CONCLUSIONSIndia, being a vast c
- Page 54 and 55: Table 3. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 56 and 57: Table 5. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 58 and 59: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN JAPANMasa I
- Page 60 and 61: production, these ratios were deter
- Page 62 and 63: soybean using paddy fields should c
- Page 64 and 65: food industry have sharply increase
- Page 66 and 67: 7. CONCLUSIONSThe Japanese socio-ec
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 2. Change of Rice Productivi
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 4. Aid Provided by Major Cou
- Page 72 and 73: The Natural Rubber (NR) industry co
- Page 74 and 75: About 78 percent of the rubber grow
- Page 76 and 77: should be attractive to justify the
- Page 78 and 79: REFERENCESAnon. 1990. Proceedings o
- Page 80 and 81: Table 3. Agriculture Land Use in Sa
- Page 82 and 83: Table 7. Paddy Production, 1985-199
- Page 84 and 85: Table 10. Imports and Exports of Fr
- Page 86 and 87: Table 14. Exports and Imports of Pr
- Page 88 and 89: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN NEPALK. C.
- Page 90 and 91: We know hill farmers face many prob
- Page 92 and 93: Table 2. Growth of Agricultural Com
- Page 94 and 95: 3. PATTERN OF CROP DIVERSIFICATIONN
- Page 96 and 97: With regard to success stories of c
- Page 98 and 99: 5. CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PR
- Page 100 and 101: It recognizes the need for a differ
- Page 102 and 103: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THE PHILIPP
- Page 106 and 107: In coconut, diversification means t
- Page 108 and 109: were used in the preparation of the
- Page 110 and 111: There are a variety of factors that
- Page 112 and 113: Table 1. Production Area of Commerc
- Page 114 and 115: Table 3. Yield (tonnes) Per Hectare
- Page 116 and 117: Table 5. Selected Macroeconomic and
- Page 118 and 119: Table 7. Dominant Rice Cropping Pat
- Page 120 and 121: 1.2 Soils in the Crop Diversificati
- Page 122 and 123: Table 1. Major Crops, Their Extents
- Page 124 and 125: drained and rice on poorly drained
- Page 126 and 127: Figure 3. Schematic Representation
- Page 128 and 129: The potato production in the up cou
- Page 130 and 131: Table 6 clearly shows that there is
- Page 132 and 133: In addition to the above scenario,
- Page 134 and 135: 6. GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND STRATEGI
- Page 136 and 137: Panabokke, C.R. 1996. Soils and agr
- Page 138 and 139: y promoting diversified crops inste
- Page 140 and 141: Over the past few years, agricultur
- Page 142 and 143: Land TenureMore than half of the Th
- Page 144 and 145: The New theory is a novel approach
- Page 146 and 147: Mushrooms: nang-fah mushroom (Pleur
- Page 148 and 149: - Farmers can sell their rice at a
- Page 150 and 151: In order to maintain the growth rat
- Page 152 and 153: REFERENCESAthipanan, Withaya. 1995.
- Page 154 and 155:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN VIET NAMNgu
- Page 156 and 157:
3. PATTERNS OF CROP DIVERSIFICATION
- Page 158 and 159:
the contour with mulching using ric
- Page 160 and 161:
development of new crop varieties a
- Page 162 and 163:
• Cultivated and growing area und
- Page 164 and 165:
other hand, the size of an average
- Page 166 and 167:
4.1 Crop NutritionA major contribut
- Page 168 and 169:
increased from 130 million ha to 15
- Page 170 and 171:
in tobacco nurseries. These also he
- Page 172 and 173:
past experience. A sustainable prog
- Page 174 and 175:
diversification, taking into accoun
- Page 176 and 177:
The major outputs are:- Integration
- Page 178 and 179:
• Database and information materi
- Page 180 and 181:
• Business plans have been formul
- Page 182 and 183:
minimize such losses. The developme
- Page 184 and 185:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSBANGLADESHM. En
- Page 186 and 187:
SRI LANKAH.P.M. GunasenaDirectorPos
- Page 188 and 189:
FAOR.B. SinghAssistant Director-Gen