8.36 m/ha <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area shift between 1966/67 and 1996/97. As we consider <strong>the</strong> shareof <strong>in</strong>dividual crops with<strong>in</strong> cereals, although <strong>the</strong> share of cereals as a group has decl<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong>area share of rice has <strong>in</strong>creased cont<strong>in</strong>uously over all <strong>the</strong> four periods. Wheat, althoughhav<strong>in</strong>g a decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g area share until 1986/87, also ga<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> its share when <strong>the</strong> entire period isconsidered. Thus, <strong>the</strong> area loss of cereals can be attributed entirely to <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g areashare of coarse cereals, especially sorghum, pearl millet, barely and small millets. It can benoted that even with<strong>in</strong> coarse cereals, <strong>the</strong> area share of maize shows a marg<strong>in</strong>al improvementover <strong>the</strong> years. With<strong>in</strong> oilseeds, <strong>the</strong> crops show<strong>in</strong>g steady improvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir area shareare: rapeseed and mustard, soybean and sunflower. Among <strong>the</strong>se three oilseeds ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>area share, rapeseed and mustard are substantially grown as <strong>in</strong>tercrops with wheat. On <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> area shares of o<strong>the</strong>r oilseeds <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g groundnut (that has a dom<strong>in</strong>ant areashare with<strong>in</strong> oilseeds) but exclud<strong>in</strong>g coconut, which is more a plantation crop than field crop,have ei<strong>the</strong>r fluctuated or decl<strong>in</strong>ed. The area share of groundnut, though improved dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>last period, has decl<strong>in</strong>ed as compared to its share <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pre-Green Revolution period. But,<strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g area share of crops - especially those with only a marg<strong>in</strong>al change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir areashare - need not necessarily imply a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual area under <strong>the</strong>se crops. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>Gross <strong>Crop</strong>ped Area (GCA) is constantly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g over time, partly through an expansionof net sown areas as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial stages of <strong>the</strong> Green Revolution and partly through<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity of cropp<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly by irrigation expansion, <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g area share canco<strong>in</strong>cide with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> absolute <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area under crops. This can be seen fromTables 4 and 5 show<strong>in</strong>g actual area under various crops and <strong>the</strong>ir groups. Although <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area share of o<strong>the</strong>r commercial crops is not as dramatic as that of oilseeds, itis still notable because of its implications for <strong>the</strong> direction of Indian agriculture. But, among<strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r commercial crops that cover fibres, spices, fruits and vegetables, and o<strong>the</strong>r fieldcrops such as tobacco and sugar cane and plantation crops, only spices, fruits and vegetablesshow a steady improvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir area shares, whereas o<strong>the</strong>rs show mostly a decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gtrend. This is particularly true for fibres and o<strong>the</strong>r field crops that have over four fifths of <strong>the</strong>total area under <strong>the</strong> broad group of o<strong>the</strong>r commercial crops. However, sugar cane, <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> category of o<strong>the</strong>r field crops, shows an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> its area share. This is also true forcotton <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fibre category. While all spice crops show a gradual <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>irarea share, only three of <strong>the</strong> six crops <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fruits and vegetables category show aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir area share over <strong>the</strong> years. These crops are banana, potato and onion.3.3 Success Story <strong>in</strong> <strong>Crop</strong> <strong>Diversification</strong>It is clear that most of <strong>the</strong> area shifts that occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three decades between1966/67 and 1996/97 is from coarse cereals to oilseeds. Three notable aspects of this areashift towards oilseeds can be noted. First, most of <strong>the</strong>se area shifts have occurredparticularly dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> decade end<strong>in</strong>g 1996/97. A protective trade environment, favourableprice policy and <strong>the</strong> connect<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Technology Mission on Oilseeds (TMO) dur<strong>in</strong>g thisperiod have all enhanced <strong>the</strong> comparative advantage of oilseeds. As can be seen from Table2, <strong>the</strong> area share of oilseeds that <strong>in</strong>creased just by a percentage each dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two decadesbefore 1986/87 has risen suddenly by 43 percent dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> decade end<strong>in</strong>g 1996/97. Second,<strong>the</strong> area shift dur<strong>in</strong>g this period comes ma<strong>in</strong>ly from barley and pulses o<strong>the</strong>r than pigeon pea.S<strong>in</strong>ce most of those crops los<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir area share are usually grown under ra<strong>in</strong>fed conditionswhere oilseeds can also be grown, <strong>the</strong> area shift can be said to <strong>in</strong>volve mostly ra<strong>in</strong>fed areas,although comparative advantage and crop rotation considerations often favour oilseeds even<strong>in</strong> groundwater irrigated areas. Thirdly, as can be seen from Table 3, <strong>the</strong>re is also asignificant area shift with<strong>in</strong> oilseed crops. For <strong>in</strong>stance, while <strong>the</strong> area shares of rapeseedand mustard, sunflower and soybean are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g steadily, those of sesamum, l<strong>in</strong>seed and37
nigerseed are decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g gradually. Thus, <strong>the</strong> area shift has favoured only a sub-sector with<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> oilseed sector partly because of constant changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparative advantage ofdifferent oilseeds and partly because of <strong>the</strong> impact of chang<strong>in</strong>g consumers' preferences on<strong>the</strong> relative demand of oilseeds.3.4 <strong>Crop</strong> <strong>Diversification</strong> and CompositionAs noted already, area shifts and crop pattern changes can lead ei<strong>the</strong>r to cropspecialization or to crop diversification. The area share of foodgra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>creased dur<strong>in</strong>g 1967-76 due partly to <strong>the</strong>ir yield advantages created by irrigation expansion and Green Revolutiontechnologies and partly to government policies pursued to encourage food production andelim<strong>in</strong>ate food imports. As a result, <strong>the</strong>re was a tendency towards cereal centeredspecialization. But, later when <strong>in</strong>creased productivity of foodgra<strong>in</strong>s, especially cereals, madeit possible to allocate more area to o<strong>the</strong>r crops such as oilseeds with a severe supply shortage,<strong>the</strong> specialization tendency witnessed earlier has given room for overall crop diversification.Even with<strong>in</strong> such an overall crop diversification, it is also possible to see specializationtendencies with<strong>in</strong> each crop group. For <strong>in</strong>stance, with<strong>in</strong> cereals, <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share of coarsecereals and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g share of wheat and rice <strong>in</strong>dicates a rice and wheat centeredspecialization. Such a specialization has become possible because with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> achievement ofself-sufficiency, ma<strong>in</strong>ly through an expand<strong>in</strong>g production of wheat and rice, <strong>the</strong> foodimplication of coarse cereals has decl<strong>in</strong>ed almost co<strong>in</strong>cid<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong>ir decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g demandprompted by an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>curr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come level. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, with<strong>in</strong> oilseeds,even though groundnut still has a dom<strong>in</strong>ant area share, <strong>the</strong> growth of area under rapeseed andmustard, sunflower and soybean <strong>in</strong>dicates an ongo<strong>in</strong>g structural change lead<strong>in</strong>g todiversification with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> oilseed sector. The issue of crop diversification, althoughconsidered <strong>in</strong> area terms, assumes significance <strong>in</strong> view of its effects on <strong>the</strong> supply-demandbalance of ma<strong>in</strong> crops and crop groups. The rice and wheat-centered specialization, for<strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong>dicates an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply of wheat and rice but a reduced supply of coarsecereals. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> demand for coarse cereals is decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and that for wheat and rice is<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g due to changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come pattern, <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir supply are actuallynecessary to achieve <strong>the</strong> required demand-supply balance. A similar l<strong>in</strong>e of argument canalso be extended to o<strong>the</strong>r crops where <strong>in</strong> addition to domestic demand, <strong>in</strong>ternational demandand supply also assume significance.Clearly, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Green Revolution period, <strong>the</strong> foodgra<strong>in</strong>s category has ev<strong>in</strong>ced an<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g tendency towards specialization with an unbalanced area composition, whereas<strong>the</strong> non-foodgra<strong>in</strong>s category has shown an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g tendency to diversify with an improvedbalance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir area composition. But, dur<strong>in</strong>g 1976-97 <strong>the</strong> non-foodgra<strong>in</strong>s category has alsocaught up with <strong>the</strong> specialization tendency and area imbalance that characterized foodgra<strong>in</strong>sthroughout <strong>the</strong> entire period. The reason for <strong>the</strong> specialization tendency with<strong>in</strong> foodgra<strong>in</strong>s isra<strong>the</strong>r obvious <strong>in</strong> view of <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g area share of coarse cereals and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g areashare of rice and wheat. The chang<strong>in</strong>g area share of crops can also expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> specializationtendencies observed among <strong>the</strong> non-foodgra<strong>in</strong>s. As we have seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of Tables 2and 3, <strong>the</strong> area shares of oilseeds and o<strong>the</strong>r commercial crops have <strong>in</strong>creased especiallydur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> post Green Revolution period characterized by a prices and market-responsiveagriculture <strong>in</strong>evitable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> aftermath of achiev<strong>in</strong>g food self-sufficiency. It is important tonote, however, that oilseeds are more diversified with an enhanced balance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir areacomposition. With<strong>in</strong> foodgra<strong>in</strong>s, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, while cereals tend towards specializationwith an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g imbalance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir area composition, pulses ev<strong>in</strong>ce a tendency to diversifywith a decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g imbalance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir area composition. The latter result is ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to <strong>the</strong>38
- Page 2 and 3: RAP PUBLICATION: 2001/03CROP DIVERS
- Page 4 and 5: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THEASIA-PAC
- Page 6 and 7: 13. INTENSIFICATION OF CROP DIVERSI
- Page 8 and 9: INTRODUCTORY REMARKSMinas K. Papade
- Page 10 and 11: New opportunities that would benefi
- Page 12 and 13: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN BANGLADESHM
- Page 14 and 15: (CDP) during 1990/95 in 125 Thanas
- Page 16 and 17: SlName of Crops1 Aus:HYVLocalTable
- Page 18 and 19: Table 4. Trade of Crops/products (I
- Page 20 and 21: through development projects implem
- Page 22 and 23: y the terminal year of the Fifth Pl
- Page 24 and 25: cropping. This has only been possib
- Page 26 and 27: process and export those labour int
- Page 28 and 29: g) restoration/improvement of soil
- Page 30 and 31: 8. RECOMMENDATIONSConsidering the i
- Page 32 and 33: enthusiasm of the farmers in their
- Page 34 and 35: 3.3 The Formation and Development o
- Page 36 and 37: carried out for years, guarantees t
- Page 38 and 39: environment protection. Special att
- Page 40 and 41: 2. CROP PRODUCTION AND ECONOMICS SC
- Page 42 and 43: What is most notable is the change
- Page 46 and 47: fact that the area shares of the do
- Page 48 and 49: country. Therefore, a judicious use
- Page 50 and 51: 5.3 Emerging Technology and Crop Di
- Page 52 and 53: 7. CONCLUSIONSIndia, being a vast c
- Page 54 and 55: Table 3. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 56 and 57: Table 5. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 58 and 59: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN JAPANMasa I
- Page 60 and 61: production, these ratios were deter
- Page 62 and 63: soybean using paddy fields should c
- Page 64 and 65: food industry have sharply increase
- Page 66 and 67: 7. CONCLUSIONSThe Japanese socio-ec
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 2. Change of Rice Productivi
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 4. Aid Provided by Major Cou
- Page 72 and 73: The Natural Rubber (NR) industry co
- Page 74 and 75: About 78 percent of the rubber grow
- Page 76 and 77: should be attractive to justify the
- Page 78 and 79: REFERENCESAnon. 1990. Proceedings o
- Page 80 and 81: Table 3. Agriculture Land Use in Sa
- Page 82 and 83: Table 7. Paddy Production, 1985-199
- Page 84 and 85: Table 10. Imports and Exports of Fr
- Page 86 and 87: Table 14. Exports and Imports of Pr
- Page 88 and 89: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN NEPALK. C.
- Page 90 and 91: We know hill farmers face many prob
- Page 92 and 93: Table 2. Growth of Agricultural Com
- Page 94 and 95:
3. PATTERN OF CROP DIVERSIFICATIONN
- Page 96 and 97:
With regard to success stories of c
- Page 98 and 99:
5. CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PR
- Page 100 and 101:
It recognizes the need for a differ
- Page 102 and 103:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THE PHILIPP
- Page 104 and 105:
2.3 Yield Per Hectare of Agricultur
- Page 106 and 107:
In coconut, diversification means t
- Page 108 and 109:
were used in the preparation of the
- Page 110 and 111:
There are a variety of factors that
- Page 112 and 113:
Table 1. Production Area of Commerc
- Page 114 and 115:
Table 3. Yield (tonnes) Per Hectare
- Page 116 and 117:
Table 5. Selected Macroeconomic and
- Page 118 and 119:
Table 7. Dominant Rice Cropping Pat
- Page 120 and 121:
1.2 Soils in the Crop Diversificati
- Page 122 and 123:
Table 1. Major Crops, Their Extents
- Page 124 and 125:
drained and rice on poorly drained
- Page 126 and 127:
Figure 3. Schematic Representation
- Page 128 and 129:
The potato production in the up cou
- Page 130 and 131:
Table 6 clearly shows that there is
- Page 132 and 133:
In addition to the above scenario,
- Page 134 and 135:
6. GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND STRATEGI
- Page 136 and 137:
Panabokke, C.R. 1996. Soils and agr
- Page 138 and 139:
y promoting diversified crops inste
- Page 140 and 141:
Over the past few years, agricultur
- Page 142 and 143:
Land TenureMore than half of the Th
- Page 144 and 145:
The New theory is a novel approach
- Page 146 and 147:
Mushrooms: nang-fah mushroom (Pleur
- Page 148 and 149:
- Farmers can sell their rice at a
- Page 150 and 151:
In order to maintain the growth rat
- Page 152 and 153:
REFERENCESAthipanan, Withaya. 1995.
- Page 154 and 155:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN VIET NAMNgu
- Page 156 and 157:
3. PATTERNS OF CROP DIVERSIFICATION
- Page 158 and 159:
the contour with mulching using ric
- Page 160 and 161:
development of new crop varieties a
- Page 162 and 163:
• Cultivated and growing area und
- Page 164 and 165:
other hand, the size of an average
- Page 166 and 167:
4.1 Crop NutritionA major contribut
- Page 168 and 169:
increased from 130 million ha to 15
- Page 170 and 171:
in tobacco nurseries. These also he
- Page 172 and 173:
past experience. A sustainable prog
- Page 174 and 175:
diversification, taking into accoun
- Page 176 and 177:
The major outputs are:- Integration
- Page 178 and 179:
• Database and information materi
- Page 180 and 181:
• Business plans have been formul
- Page 182 and 183:
minimize such losses. The developme
- Page 184 and 185:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSBANGLADESHM. En
- Page 186 and 187:
SRI LANKAH.P.M. GunasenaDirectorPos
- Page 188 and 189:
FAOR.B. SinghAssistant Director-Gen