y promot<strong>in</strong>g diversified crops <strong>in</strong>stead of a s<strong>in</strong>gle crop; which took <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong>comedistribution of farmers and natural resources conservation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g environmental issues.Therefore, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> concept implied <strong>in</strong> farm diversification (crops, livestock andfisheries) and crop diversification programmes should be placed <strong>in</strong> a proper perspective <strong>in</strong>order to- respond to <strong>the</strong> objectives and goals of <strong>the</strong> farmers such as consumption, householdutilities, <strong>in</strong>come etc;- <strong>in</strong>crease farm <strong>in</strong>come and provide a cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>come for farm families;- reduce farmers’ risk and encourage <strong>the</strong>m to make <strong>the</strong>ir own farm plans;- promote various farm enterprises to avoid any risk and uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties from naturaldisasters and market<strong>in</strong>g setbacks;- encourage <strong>the</strong> farmers to recycle farm wastes and <strong>in</strong>tegrate farm activities such ascrops, livestock and fisheries;- m<strong>in</strong>imize <strong>the</strong> use of external <strong>in</strong>puts; and- conserve <strong>the</strong> natural resources and balance <strong>the</strong> agro-ecosystems at <strong>the</strong> farm level.2. AGRICULTURE SITUATION IN THAILANDAbout 41.5 percent (21.28 million hectares) of <strong>the</strong> total area are farm hold<strong>in</strong>gs, withsome 17.5 percent of this presently under irrigation. This land, both irrigated and nonirrigated,is used by some 5.2 million farm families to produce agricultural goods fordomestic consumption and export.Among <strong>the</strong> large number of crops of economic significance, rice is <strong>the</strong> mostimportant which is widely grown <strong>in</strong> all <strong>region</strong>s and covers about half of <strong>the</strong> country’scultivated area. O<strong>the</strong>r major field crops are cassava, corn, sugar cane, oil crops and perennialtrees such as para rubber, fruit trees cover <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> area. The utilization of farm land isas follows: 51 percent for paddy, 24 percent under field crops, 17 percent under fruit treesand o<strong>the</strong>r tree crops and o<strong>the</strong>rs occupy 8 percent. The major planted areas of selected cropsare rice, maize, cassava and rubber. The planted area, yield, production and value ofeconomic crops <strong>in</strong> 1997/1998 are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.Table 1. Planted Area, Yield, Production and Value of Economic <strong>Crop</strong>s<strong>Crop</strong>s Area(1,000 ha.)Yield(ton/ha.)Production(1,000 tonnes)Value(Million of US$)Major rice 9,113.28 2.14 18,789 3,275.39Second rice 1,156.96 4.23 4,791 825.37Maize 1,396.64 3.20 3,832 421.52Cassava 1,071.04 14.93 15,591 491.12Sugar cane 943.52 49.68 46,873 594.12Para Rubber 1,831.04 1.42 2,169 1,262.90The National Economic and Social Development Plan also places emphasis on <strong>the</strong>commercialization of agriculture, mov<strong>in</strong>g away from subsistence farm<strong>in</strong>g towards <strong>in</strong>tensivemonocrop production for export. However, <strong>the</strong> proportion of <strong>the</strong> agricultural gross domesticproduct (GDP) decl<strong>in</strong>ed to 25 percent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 3 rd plan and less than 15 percent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 7 th plan,131
espectively as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The Table 3 <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> GDP <strong>in</strong> agricultural sector from<strong>the</strong> 3 rd - 7 th plan which <strong>in</strong>cludes crops, livestock and fisheries, shar<strong>in</strong>g about 60 percent, 8-10percent and 9-11 percent of GDP <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector, respectively.Table 2. Gross Domestic Product Value dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 3 rd - 7 thNational Development PlanUnit : percentageSector 3 rd Plan1972-19764 th Plan1977-19815 th Plan1982-19866 th Plan1987-19917 th Plan1992-19961. Agriculture 25.08 21.39 19.01 14.88 10.302. Non-Agriculture 74.92 78.61 80.99 85.12 89.70Source: National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB), 1997Table 3. Gross Domestic Product Value <strong>in</strong> Agricultural SectorUnit : percentageSector 3 rd Plan 4 th Plan 5 th Plan 6 th Plan 7 th Plan1972-1976 1977-1981 1982-1986 1987-1991 1992-1996Agriculture 100 100 100 100 100- <strong>Crop</strong> 60.8 60.7 63.2 61.9 61.3- Livestock 8.8 9.9 9.5 10.6 10.7- Fishery 9.8 9.7 9.7 10.7 11.7- Forestry 10.4 7.7 5.3 3.2 0.6- Simple AgricultureProcess<strong>in</strong>g Productand AgricultureServices10.2 12 12.3 13.6 15.7Source: National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB), 1997The situation of import and export of crop products <strong>in</strong> 1997 showed that <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipalagricultural products exported <strong>in</strong>cluded rice, para rubber, cassava products, fruits andvegetables (fresh, frozen, processed and canned), non-glut<strong>in</strong>ous and glut<strong>in</strong>ous rice flour,canned p<strong>in</strong>eapple, ref<strong>in</strong>ed sugar etc. Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal agricultural products imported were paper andpaper products, soybean products, raw cotton and l<strong>in</strong>t, wheat, palm oil, vegetable seeds etc.3. NEED FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENTDur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> past three decades, national development grew <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong> variousaspects, <strong>in</strong> particular, <strong>in</strong>dustries, services and agriculture. Natural resources were muchutilized, both directly and <strong>in</strong>directly, for production <strong>in</strong> each of <strong>the</strong> sectors. Agricultural<strong>in</strong>puts were brought <strong>in</strong>to use, i.e., fertilizers and chemical pesticides. Impact of suchdevelopment resulted <strong>in</strong> deforestation, soil fertility loss, drought, flood<strong>in</strong>g and seriousoutbreaks of plant pests as well as pollution of soil, water and <strong>the</strong> atmosphere. Thai farmers,particularly rural poor and even average growers, could not produce as much as expected.They suffered accord<strong>in</strong>gly from low production, low prices, but high cost of production.132
- Page 2 and 3:
RAP PUBLICATION: 2001/03CROP DIVERS
- Page 4 and 5:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THEASIA-PAC
- Page 6 and 7:
13. INTENSIFICATION OF CROP DIVERSI
- Page 8 and 9:
INTRODUCTORY REMARKSMinas K. Papade
- Page 10 and 11:
New opportunities that would benefi
- Page 12 and 13:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN BANGLADESHM
- Page 14 and 15:
(CDP) during 1990/95 in 125 Thanas
- Page 16 and 17:
SlName of Crops1 Aus:HYVLocalTable
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 4. Trade of Crops/products (I
- Page 20 and 21:
through development projects implem
- Page 22 and 23:
y the terminal year of the Fifth Pl
- Page 24 and 25:
cropping. This has only been possib
- Page 26 and 27:
process and export those labour int
- Page 28 and 29:
g) restoration/improvement of soil
- Page 30 and 31:
8. RECOMMENDATIONSConsidering the i
- Page 32 and 33:
enthusiasm of the farmers in their
- Page 34 and 35:
3.3 The Formation and Development o
- Page 36 and 37:
carried out for years, guarantees t
- Page 38 and 39:
environment protection. Special att
- Page 40 and 41:
2. CROP PRODUCTION AND ECONOMICS SC
- Page 42 and 43:
What is most notable is the change
- Page 44 and 45:
8.36 m/ha involved in the area shif
- Page 46 and 47:
fact that the area shares of the do
- Page 48 and 49:
country. Therefore, a judicious use
- Page 50 and 51:
5.3 Emerging Technology and Crop Di
- Page 52 and 53:
7. CONCLUSIONSIndia, being a vast c
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 3. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 5. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 58 and 59:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN JAPANMasa I
- Page 60 and 61:
production, these ratios were deter
- Page 62 and 63:
soybean using paddy fields should c
- Page 64 and 65:
food industry have sharply increase
- Page 66 and 67:
7. CONCLUSIONSThe Japanese socio-ec
- Page 68 and 69:
Figure 2. Change of Rice Productivi
- Page 70 and 71:
Figure 4. Aid Provided by Major Cou
- Page 72 and 73:
The Natural Rubber (NR) industry co
- Page 74 and 75:
About 78 percent of the rubber grow
- Page 76 and 77:
should be attractive to justify the
- Page 78 and 79:
REFERENCESAnon. 1990. Proceedings o
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 3. Agriculture Land Use in Sa
- Page 82 and 83:
Table 7. Paddy Production, 1985-199
- Page 84 and 85:
Table 10. Imports and Exports of Fr
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 14. Exports and Imports of Pr
- Page 88 and 89: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN NEPALK. C.
- Page 90 and 91: We know hill farmers face many prob
- Page 92 and 93: Table 2. Growth of Agricultural Com
- Page 94 and 95: 3. PATTERN OF CROP DIVERSIFICATIONN
- Page 96 and 97: With regard to success stories of c
- Page 98 and 99: 5. CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PR
- Page 100 and 101: It recognizes the need for a differ
- Page 102 and 103: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THE PHILIPP
- Page 104 and 105: 2.3 Yield Per Hectare of Agricultur
- Page 106 and 107: In coconut, diversification means t
- Page 108 and 109: were used in the preparation of the
- Page 110 and 111: There are a variety of factors that
- Page 112 and 113: Table 1. Production Area of Commerc
- Page 114 and 115: Table 3. Yield (tonnes) Per Hectare
- Page 116 and 117: Table 5. Selected Macroeconomic and
- Page 118 and 119: Table 7. Dominant Rice Cropping Pat
- Page 120 and 121: 1.2 Soils in the Crop Diversificati
- Page 122 and 123: Table 1. Major Crops, Their Extents
- Page 124 and 125: drained and rice on poorly drained
- Page 126 and 127: Figure 3. Schematic Representation
- Page 128 and 129: The potato production in the up cou
- Page 130 and 131: Table 6 clearly shows that there is
- Page 132 and 133: In addition to the above scenario,
- Page 134 and 135: 6. GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND STRATEGI
- Page 136 and 137: Panabokke, C.R. 1996. Soils and agr
- Page 140 and 141: Over the past few years, agricultur
- Page 142 and 143: Land TenureMore than half of the Th
- Page 144 and 145: The New theory is a novel approach
- Page 146 and 147: Mushrooms: nang-fah mushroom (Pleur
- Page 148 and 149: - Farmers can sell their rice at a
- Page 150 and 151: In order to maintain the growth rat
- Page 152 and 153: REFERENCESAthipanan, Withaya. 1995.
- Page 154 and 155: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN VIET NAMNgu
- Page 156 and 157: 3. PATTERNS OF CROP DIVERSIFICATION
- Page 158 and 159: the contour with mulching using ric
- Page 160 and 161: development of new crop varieties a
- Page 162 and 163: • Cultivated and growing area und
- Page 164 and 165: other hand, the size of an average
- Page 166 and 167: 4.1 Crop NutritionA major contribut
- Page 168 and 169: increased from 130 million ha to 15
- Page 170 and 171: in tobacco nurseries. These also he
- Page 172 and 173: past experience. A sustainable prog
- Page 174 and 175: diversification, taking into accoun
- Page 176 and 177: The major outputs are:- Integration
- Page 178 and 179: • Database and information materi
- Page 180 and 181: • Business plans have been formul
- Page 182 and 183: minimize such losses. The developme
- Page 184 and 185: LIST OF PARTICIPANTSBANGLADESHM. En
- Page 186 and 187: SRI LANKAH.P.M. GunasenaDirectorPos
- Page 188 and 189:
FAOR.B. SinghAssistant Director-Gen