The Natural Rubber (NR) <strong>in</strong>dustry contributes to national development <strong>in</strong> terms ofexport earn<strong>in</strong>gs, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as well as employment and <strong>in</strong>come,<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g about 420,000 smallholders and 53,000 estate workers. The NR <strong>in</strong>dustry alsoprovides employment opportunities <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r ancillary activities such as <strong>in</strong> trad<strong>in</strong>g, process<strong>in</strong>gand manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. In 1995, export earn<strong>in</strong>gs from NR and rubber products amounted toRM7.9 billion (USD 2.1 billion), represent<strong>in</strong>g 3.9 percent of <strong>the</strong> total export value. Between1985 and 1995, production contracted by 27.2 percent from 1.47 million tonnes to 1.07million tonnes and <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e was experienced by both <strong>the</strong> smallholder and estate sectors(Table 5). This was due to <strong>the</strong> weak rubber prices prevail<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period. The decl<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong> production led to <strong>the</strong> closure of many process<strong>in</strong>g factories, especially <strong>the</strong> smaller and lessefficient ones, due to <strong>the</strong> shortage of raw materials. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g factories are operat<strong>in</strong>g atan average of 55 percent capacity. The import of raw materials from o<strong>the</strong>r produc<strong>in</strong>gcountries will be on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease to meet <strong>the</strong> demand of local processors and rubber productmanufacturers.The oil palm <strong>in</strong>dustry has evolved from a mere producer and exporter of crude palmoil (CPO) <strong>in</strong>to a more diversified entity, creat<strong>in</strong>g new downstream and support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries.Over <strong>the</strong> years, it has rema<strong>in</strong>ed resilient <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face of many challenges and has cont<strong>in</strong>ued tocontribute significantly to <strong>the</strong> national economy. Its contribution to GDP amounted toRM6.8 billion <strong>in</strong> 1995 or 5.7 percent, up from RM3.6 billion <strong>in</strong> 1985. Among <strong>the</strong> primarycommodities, palm oil is <strong>the</strong> country's largest export earner, total<strong>in</strong>g RM13 billion (US$3.4billion). About 250,000 families <strong>in</strong> Government land schemes and <strong>in</strong>dependentsmallhold<strong>in</strong>gs as well as 80,000 workers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> private estates of Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia aredependent on this <strong>in</strong>dustry for <strong>the</strong>ir livelihood. Concurrent with <strong>the</strong> rapid expansion <strong>in</strong> oilpalm planted areas, <strong>the</strong> number of oil palm mills also <strong>in</strong>creased. At <strong>the</strong> end of 1995, <strong>the</strong>rewere 281 oil palm mills with an annual operat<strong>in</strong>g capacity of 50.8 million tonnes of freshfruit bunches (FFB), 41 ref<strong>in</strong>eries and 13 oleochemical manufacturers with an annualoperat<strong>in</strong>g capacity of 10.15 million tonnes and 0.82 million tonnes, respectively. Processedpalm oil exports grew from 3.4 million tonnes to 6.5 million tonnes dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period 1985-95 (Table 6).Over <strong>the</strong> 1985-95 period, <strong>the</strong> country recorded an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> average yield and totalrice production (Table 7). National yield recorded an <strong>in</strong>crease from 2.7 tonnes per hectare to3.2 tonnes per hectare dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period. Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia recorded an average yield of3.7 tonnes per hectare <strong>in</strong> 1995, while Sarawak and Sabah averaged 1.2 and 2.7 tonnes perhectare, respectively. Total rice production <strong>in</strong>creased from 1.7 million tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 2.1million tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1995. The eight ma<strong>in</strong> granary areas, which accounted for more than 70percent of rice production, recorded an <strong>in</strong>creased yield from 3.3 tonnes per hectare <strong>in</strong> 1985 to4 tonnes per hectare <strong>in</strong> 1995. Over <strong>the</strong> 1985-95 period, domestic production accounted forabout 77 percent of <strong>the</strong> total domestic consumption. In 1995 importation of rice amounted to427,570 tonnes valued at RM356.1 million (US$94 million).Cocoa production <strong>in</strong>creased from 108,000 tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 247,000 tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1990but subsequently decl<strong>in</strong>ed to 132,000 tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1995. Cocoa rema<strong>in</strong>s an important agrobased<strong>in</strong>dustry for <strong>the</strong> country. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990-1995 period, exports of <strong>the</strong>se products have<strong>in</strong>creased by about 48 percent, from RM307 million (US$81 million) to about RM453million (US$119 million) (Table 8). The cocoa <strong>in</strong>dustry is a source of livelihood for about120,000 smallholder families and provides employment for about 36,000 workers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>estate sector. Additionally, a substantial number is employed <strong>in</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries suchas65
<strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g, gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. Currently, Malaysia has 10 gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g factorieswith a production capacity of 125,000 tonnes per year.The fruit <strong>in</strong>dustry is a smallholder-based <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g 270,000 farmers. In1995, <strong>the</strong> area under fruits was 260,600 hectares, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year 2010 it is forecasted to<strong>in</strong>crease to 375,000 hectares (Table 9). For <strong>the</strong> 1985-95 period, <strong>the</strong> production of fresh fruits<strong>in</strong>creased at <strong>the</strong> rate of 4.8 percent per annum from 638,100 tonnes to 1,019,900 tonnes. Thetotal value of fresh fruits exported <strong>in</strong>creased from RM72.3 million (US$19 million) <strong>in</strong> 1985to RM170.2 million (US$45 million) <strong>in</strong> 1995 (Table 10). The major fruits exported weremelons, durians, papaya, banana and starfruit. The exports of processed fruits <strong>in</strong>creasedfrom RM110 million (US$29 million) <strong>in</strong> 1985 to RM165 million (US$43 million) <strong>in</strong> 1995.However, Malaysia is still a net importer of fruits and fruit products.The production of vegetables has <strong>in</strong>creased from 540,700 tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 718,100tonnes <strong>in</strong> 1995 at an average annual growth rate of about 2.9 percent (Table 11). In <strong>the</strong> year2010, it is forecasted that <strong>the</strong> planted acreage will <strong>in</strong>crease to 86,000 hectares with aproduction of 1.6 million tonnes (Table 12). The export of vegetables has <strong>in</strong>creased at <strong>the</strong>rate of 15.2 percent per annum from RM39 million (US$10 million) <strong>in</strong> 1985 to RM160million (US$42 million) <strong>in</strong> 1995. The value of import has <strong>in</strong>creased from RM276 million(US$73 million) <strong>in</strong> 1985 to RM683 million (US$180 million) <strong>in</strong> 1995 (Table 13).The productivity of coconut smallhold<strong>in</strong>gs is very low, <strong>the</strong> average annual yieldbe<strong>in</strong>g 4,000 nuts per hectare compared to a potential of 20,000 nuts per hectare us<strong>in</strong>grecommended varieties. Never<strong>the</strong>less, Malaysia is a net exporter of coconut products. Totalexports <strong>in</strong> 1995 amounted to RM165.2 million (US$43 million) while imports totaled RM77million (US$20 million) as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 14. However, currently most coconut process<strong>in</strong>gfirms are hav<strong>in</strong>g problems gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> coconuts domestically and are <strong>the</strong>refore operat<strong>in</strong>gbelow capacity lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>efficiencies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> production of coconut-based products.Overall, <strong>the</strong> contribution of <strong>the</strong> agricultural sector to GDP, employment and exportearn<strong>in</strong>gs is on <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e (Table 15). In 1975, <strong>the</strong> contribution of agriculture to GDP was 28percent but <strong>in</strong> 1995 it has gone down to 13.6 percent. In 1975, <strong>the</strong> contribution of agricultureto employment was 37 percent but decl<strong>in</strong>ed to 18 percent <strong>in</strong> 1995. The contribution ofagriculture to export earn<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> 1975 was 50 percent and <strong>in</strong> 1995 it was only 13.1 percent.The forecasted land use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year 2010 <strong>in</strong>dicates that rubber, coconut and cocoahold<strong>in</strong>gs, as well as planted areas of rice will be reduced by 505,000, 70,000, 60,000 and220,000 hectares, respectively (Table 16). In Sabah and Sarawak where <strong>the</strong>re are substantialland areas, new land development will be undertaken.3. PATTERNS OF CROP DIVERSIFICATIONRice is ma<strong>in</strong>ly grown by smallholders with an average farm size of about 1.06hectares. Wetland rice constituted 85 percent of <strong>the</strong> total rice area <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country with <strong>the</strong>rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 15 percent made up of upland rice. In Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia, 76 percent of <strong>the</strong> areais provided with extensive irrigation and dra<strong>in</strong>age facilities while only 15 percent of <strong>the</strong> area<strong>in</strong> Sabah and Sarawak are irrigated. About 72 percent of rice production comes from <strong>the</strong>eight granary areas that are able to produce two crops <strong>in</strong> a year.66
- Page 2 and 3:
RAP PUBLICATION: 2001/03CROP DIVERS
- Page 4 and 5:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THEASIA-PAC
- Page 6 and 7:
13. INTENSIFICATION OF CROP DIVERSI
- Page 8 and 9:
INTRODUCTORY REMARKSMinas K. Papade
- Page 10 and 11:
New opportunities that would benefi
- Page 12 and 13:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN BANGLADESHM
- Page 14 and 15:
(CDP) during 1990/95 in 125 Thanas
- Page 16 and 17:
SlName of Crops1 Aus:HYVLocalTable
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 4. Trade of Crops/products (I
- Page 20 and 21:
through development projects implem
- Page 22 and 23: y the terminal year of the Fifth Pl
- Page 24 and 25: cropping. This has only been possib
- Page 26 and 27: process and export those labour int
- Page 28 and 29: g) restoration/improvement of soil
- Page 30 and 31: 8. RECOMMENDATIONSConsidering the i
- Page 32 and 33: enthusiasm of the farmers in their
- Page 34 and 35: 3.3 The Formation and Development o
- Page 36 and 37: carried out for years, guarantees t
- Page 38 and 39: environment protection. Special att
- Page 40 and 41: 2. CROP PRODUCTION AND ECONOMICS SC
- Page 42 and 43: What is most notable is the change
- Page 44 and 45: 8.36 m/ha involved in the area shif
- Page 46 and 47: fact that the area shares of the do
- Page 48 and 49: country. Therefore, a judicious use
- Page 50 and 51: 5.3 Emerging Technology and Crop Di
- Page 52 and 53: 7. CONCLUSIONSIndia, being a vast c
- Page 54 and 55: Table 3. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 56 and 57: Table 5. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 58 and 59: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN JAPANMasa I
- Page 60 and 61: production, these ratios were deter
- Page 62 and 63: soybean using paddy fields should c
- Page 64 and 65: food industry have sharply increase
- Page 66 and 67: 7. CONCLUSIONSThe Japanese socio-ec
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 2. Change of Rice Productivi
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 4. Aid Provided by Major Cou
- Page 74 and 75: About 78 percent of the rubber grow
- Page 76 and 77: should be attractive to justify the
- Page 78 and 79: REFERENCESAnon. 1990. Proceedings o
- Page 80 and 81: Table 3. Agriculture Land Use in Sa
- Page 82 and 83: Table 7. Paddy Production, 1985-199
- Page 84 and 85: Table 10. Imports and Exports of Fr
- Page 86 and 87: Table 14. Exports and Imports of Pr
- Page 88 and 89: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN NEPALK. C.
- Page 90 and 91: We know hill farmers face many prob
- Page 92 and 93: Table 2. Growth of Agricultural Com
- Page 94 and 95: 3. PATTERN OF CROP DIVERSIFICATIONN
- Page 96 and 97: With regard to success stories of c
- Page 98 and 99: 5. CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PR
- Page 100 and 101: It recognizes the need for a differ
- Page 102 and 103: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THE PHILIPP
- Page 104 and 105: 2.3 Yield Per Hectare of Agricultur
- Page 106 and 107: In coconut, diversification means t
- Page 108 and 109: were used in the preparation of the
- Page 110 and 111: There are a variety of factors that
- Page 112 and 113: Table 1. Production Area of Commerc
- Page 114 and 115: Table 3. Yield (tonnes) Per Hectare
- Page 116 and 117: Table 5. Selected Macroeconomic and
- Page 118 and 119: Table 7. Dominant Rice Cropping Pat
- Page 120 and 121: 1.2 Soils in the Crop Diversificati
- Page 122 and 123:
Table 1. Major Crops, Their Extents
- Page 124 and 125:
drained and rice on poorly drained
- Page 126 and 127:
Figure 3. Schematic Representation
- Page 128 and 129:
The potato production in the up cou
- Page 130 and 131:
Table 6 clearly shows that there is
- Page 132 and 133:
In addition to the above scenario,
- Page 134 and 135:
6. GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND STRATEGI
- Page 136 and 137:
Panabokke, C.R. 1996. Soils and agr
- Page 138 and 139:
y promoting diversified crops inste
- Page 140 and 141:
Over the past few years, agricultur
- Page 142 and 143:
Land TenureMore than half of the Th
- Page 144 and 145:
The New theory is a novel approach
- Page 146 and 147:
Mushrooms: nang-fah mushroom (Pleur
- Page 148 and 149:
- Farmers can sell their rice at a
- Page 150 and 151:
In order to maintain the growth rat
- Page 152 and 153:
REFERENCESAthipanan, Withaya. 1995.
- Page 154 and 155:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN VIET NAMNgu
- Page 156 and 157:
3. PATTERNS OF CROP DIVERSIFICATION
- Page 158 and 159:
the contour with mulching using ric
- Page 160 and 161:
development of new crop varieties a
- Page 162 and 163:
• Cultivated and growing area und
- Page 164 and 165:
other hand, the size of an average
- Page 166 and 167:
4.1 Crop NutritionA major contribut
- Page 168 and 169:
increased from 130 million ha to 15
- Page 170 and 171:
in tobacco nurseries. These also he
- Page 172 and 173:
past experience. A sustainable prog
- Page 174 and 175:
diversification, taking into accoun
- Page 176 and 177:
The major outputs are:- Integration
- Page 178 and 179:
• Database and information materi
- Page 180 and 181:
• Business plans have been formul
- Page 182 and 183:
minimize such losses. The developme
- Page 184 and 185:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSBANGLADESHM. En
- Page 186 and 187:
SRI LANKAH.P.M. GunasenaDirectorPos
- Page 188 and 189:
FAOR.B. SinghAssistant Director-Gen