In coconut, diversification means <strong>the</strong> simultaneous grow<strong>in</strong>g of one or more crops <strong>in</strong> acoconut area. Cash crops or permanent crops can be grown depend<strong>in</strong>g on a number offactors. These are <strong>the</strong> environment (soil, topography, and climate), socio-economic (tenureand capital) and technical (available technology and management requirements) factors thatcould ei<strong>the</strong>r be with<strong>in</strong> or beyond <strong>the</strong> control of <strong>the</strong> farmers (PCARRD, 1993). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,eight important considerations have been identified <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g coconut. These are:amenability of coconut farms to <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g, available market, favourable climate, suitablesoil conditions, favourable slope of <strong>the</strong> land, farmers’ resources and attitudes, technical andwork<strong>in</strong>g arrangements, and availability of good plant<strong>in</strong>g materials.A wide range of crops can be grown under coconut. Permanent crops like coffee,cacao, abaca, lanzones and o<strong>the</strong>r fruit trees can be established. Cash crops, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rhand, <strong>in</strong>clude corn, peanut, sweet potato, p<strong>in</strong>eapple, banana, mungbean, arrowroot, ramie andvegetables, among o<strong>the</strong>rs.As stated earlier, one or more permanent and cash crops can be grown under coconut.When a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of crops of vary<strong>in</strong>g heights, root<strong>in</strong>g system, and canopy patterns tomaximize utilization of sunlight, soil nutrients, and moisture is grown, this is referred to as amulti-storey cropp<strong>in</strong>g pattern. This pattern consists of three levels, namely, coconut as <strong>the</strong>top floor, perennials as <strong>the</strong> mid-storey crops and low-grow<strong>in</strong>g annuals as <strong>the</strong> ground floorcrops. Aside from <strong>the</strong> multi-storey cropp<strong>in</strong>g system, Felizardo (1988) reported that livestockand poultry are grown under coconut <strong>in</strong> a number of prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country.The suitability of <strong>the</strong> above-mentioned crops as <strong>in</strong>tercrops has been extensivelystudied. The climatic and soil requirements of most <strong>in</strong>tercrops have been determ<strong>in</strong>ed. Thereare a number of technoguides, brochures, manuals and pamphlets that detail crop varieties tobe used, cultural management practices and post-harvest and storage operations. In mostcases, <strong>the</strong> profitability of <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g with coconut is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se publications.3.3 Successful <strong>Crop</strong> <strong>Diversification</strong> PatternsTable 8 presents <strong>the</strong> documented successful crop diversification practices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Adriano (1989), garlic production exceeded that of irrigated rice<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ilocos <strong>region</strong>. Likewise, onion production was very profitable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central LuzonRegion. Similar results were reported by Gonzales <strong>in</strong> 1989; <strong>in</strong> Ilocos and Central Luzon<strong>region</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> highest profit was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from onion, peanut and garlic.As <strong>in</strong>tercrops of coconut, passion fruit, banana, p<strong>in</strong>eapple, and cacao have beendocumented to give high net returns. Research us<strong>in</strong>g black pepper + papaya/cacao +p<strong>in</strong>eapple under 17-year old coconut conducted <strong>in</strong> Davao Research Centre produced a netprofit of PHP 8,234 per hectare per cropp<strong>in</strong>g as aga<strong>in</strong>st PHP 2,494 from coconut alone.4. CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PROSPECTS OF CROPDIVERSIFICATIONMoya and Miranda (1989) discussed <strong>the</strong> technical, social and <strong>in</strong>stitutional issues <strong>in</strong>diversify<strong>in</strong>g rice areas. Technical issues <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tricate and differential relationshipsamong edaphic, climatic, hydrologic, biotic and agronomic properties of <strong>the</strong> flooded riceenvironment and dryland non-rice production systems. Socio-economic issues are h<strong>in</strong>ged on99
profitability of cultivat<strong>in</strong>g non-rice crops compared to rice, availability of markets andunstable prices of non-rice crops. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>in</strong>stitutional issues <strong>in</strong>clude irrigationservice fee payment, level of government support and farmer participation.In <strong>the</strong> rice-onion cropp<strong>in</strong>g system, farmers encountered more economic thantechnical problems. Production-related problems <strong>in</strong>clude lack of capital and high cost of<strong>in</strong>puts (Marzan, 1989).In a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study conducted by Cablayan and Valera (1989), four constra<strong>in</strong>ts tocrop diversification were identified. These were dry season ra<strong>in</strong>fall, availability of irrigationwater for rice, limited irrigation management and <strong>in</strong>appropriate on-farm irrigation anddra<strong>in</strong>age facilities. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>y noted that farmers <strong>in</strong> some areas were unfamiliar withgrow<strong>in</strong>g non-rice crops under irrigation. Unstable farm gate prices deter many farmers frompractic<strong>in</strong>g diversification.Adriano and Cabezon (1989) discussed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>the</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g economic issues andconstra<strong>in</strong>ts to crop diversification. Vital economic issues <strong>in</strong>clude match<strong>in</strong>g supply anddemand, reallocation of <strong>in</strong>vestments, and streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>stitutional l<strong>in</strong>kages.In a review on ra<strong>in</strong>fed lowland rice-based cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems done by Obcemea et. al.(1996), a list of factors that <strong>in</strong>fluence farmers to diversify to non-rice crops was presented.These were <strong>in</strong>come stability, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand for vegetables and non-rice crops, andhigher profitability per unit area. Market supply and demand, stability of prices, cost of<strong>in</strong>puts and quality of non-rice products were identified as economic factors affect<strong>in</strong>g cropdiversification. O<strong>the</strong>r equally important factors <strong>in</strong>clude availability of irrigation water, landsuitability, climatic conditions, availability of management technology, time constra<strong>in</strong>tscaused by <strong>the</strong> presence of <strong>the</strong> rice crop, farmers’ preference, resource base, <strong>in</strong>fluence ofneighbour<strong>in</strong>g farmers or extension agents, and land tenure.In a study <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g 266 farmers cultivat<strong>in</strong>g tobacco, cotton, tomato, onion,mungbean, garlic, corn, and peanut, Gonzales-Intal and Valera (1989) identified conditionsconducive to crop diversification. These were low <strong>in</strong>come from o<strong>the</strong>r sources, profitabilityas seen from o<strong>the</strong>r farmers, sufficient rice supply for one’s own consumption, availability ofseeds, <strong>in</strong>sufficient water supply, experience, perception of high market prices for <strong>the</strong> crop,and presence of technical and <strong>in</strong>stitutional support.5. GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND STRATEGIES FOR CROPDIVERSIFICATIONIn order to streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector, crop diversification was identified as astrategy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Medium-Term Philipp<strong>in</strong>e development Plan, 1987-1992. This strategy waspursued to support food security, greater employment opportunities, <strong>in</strong>creased farm <strong>in</strong>comes,and reduced dependence on traditional export commodities which are fac<strong>in</strong>g decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gdemand <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world market (Adriano and Cabezon, 1989).At <strong>the</strong> Department of Agriculture, a National Committee on <strong>Crop</strong> <strong>Diversification</strong>(NCCD) was created <strong>in</strong> 1992. This committee is <strong>in</strong>ter-agency <strong>in</strong> nature and its ma<strong>in</strong> functionwas plann<strong>in</strong>g and implementation of a crop diversification programme. Four commoditybasedplans were prepared which <strong>in</strong>clude rice, corn, coconut and sugar cane. These plans100
- Page 2 and 3:
RAP PUBLICATION: 2001/03CROP DIVERS
- Page 4 and 5:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THEASIA-PAC
- Page 6 and 7:
13. INTENSIFICATION OF CROP DIVERSI
- Page 8 and 9:
INTRODUCTORY REMARKSMinas K. Papade
- Page 10 and 11:
New opportunities that would benefi
- Page 12 and 13:
CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN BANGLADESHM
- Page 14 and 15:
(CDP) during 1990/95 in 125 Thanas
- Page 16 and 17:
SlName of Crops1 Aus:HYVLocalTable
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 4. Trade of Crops/products (I
- Page 20 and 21:
through development projects implem
- Page 22 and 23:
y the terminal year of the Fifth Pl
- Page 24 and 25:
cropping. This has only been possib
- Page 26 and 27:
process and export those labour int
- Page 28 and 29:
g) restoration/improvement of soil
- Page 30 and 31:
8. RECOMMENDATIONSConsidering the i
- Page 32 and 33:
enthusiasm of the farmers in their
- Page 34 and 35:
3.3 The Formation and Development o
- Page 36 and 37:
carried out for years, guarantees t
- Page 38 and 39:
environment protection. Special att
- Page 40 and 41:
2. CROP PRODUCTION AND ECONOMICS SC
- Page 42 and 43:
What is most notable is the change
- Page 44 and 45:
8.36 m/ha involved in the area shif
- Page 46 and 47:
fact that the area shares of the do
- Page 48 and 49:
country. Therefore, a judicious use
- Page 50 and 51:
5.3 Emerging Technology and Crop Di
- Page 52 and 53:
7. CONCLUSIONSIndia, being a vast c
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 3. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 56 and 57: Table 5. All India: Temporal Change
- Page 58 and 59: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN JAPANMasa I
- Page 60 and 61: production, these ratios were deter
- Page 62 and 63: soybean using paddy fields should c
- Page 64 and 65: food industry have sharply increase
- Page 66 and 67: 7. CONCLUSIONSThe Japanese socio-ec
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 2. Change of Rice Productivi
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 4. Aid Provided by Major Cou
- Page 72 and 73: The Natural Rubber (NR) industry co
- Page 74 and 75: About 78 percent of the rubber grow
- Page 76 and 77: should be attractive to justify the
- Page 78 and 79: REFERENCESAnon. 1990. Proceedings o
- Page 80 and 81: Table 3. Agriculture Land Use in Sa
- Page 82 and 83: Table 7. Paddy Production, 1985-199
- Page 84 and 85: Table 10. Imports and Exports of Fr
- Page 86 and 87: Table 14. Exports and Imports of Pr
- Page 88 and 89: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN NEPALK. C.
- Page 90 and 91: We know hill farmers face many prob
- Page 92 and 93: Table 2. Growth of Agricultural Com
- Page 94 and 95: 3. PATTERN OF CROP DIVERSIFICATIONN
- Page 96 and 97: With regard to success stories of c
- Page 98 and 99: 5. CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PR
- Page 100 and 101: It recognizes the need for a differ
- Page 102 and 103: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN THE PHILIPP
- Page 104 and 105: 2.3 Yield Per Hectare of Agricultur
- Page 108 and 109: were used in the preparation of the
- Page 110 and 111: There are a variety of factors that
- Page 112 and 113: Table 1. Production Area of Commerc
- Page 114 and 115: Table 3. Yield (tonnes) Per Hectare
- Page 116 and 117: Table 5. Selected Macroeconomic and
- Page 118 and 119: Table 7. Dominant Rice Cropping Pat
- Page 120 and 121: 1.2 Soils in the Crop Diversificati
- Page 122 and 123: Table 1. Major Crops, Their Extents
- Page 124 and 125: drained and rice on poorly drained
- Page 126 and 127: Figure 3. Schematic Representation
- Page 128 and 129: The potato production in the up cou
- Page 130 and 131: Table 6 clearly shows that there is
- Page 132 and 133: In addition to the above scenario,
- Page 134 and 135: 6. GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND STRATEGI
- Page 136 and 137: Panabokke, C.R. 1996. Soils and agr
- Page 138 and 139: y promoting diversified crops inste
- Page 140 and 141: Over the past few years, agricultur
- Page 142 and 143: Land TenureMore than half of the Th
- Page 144 and 145: The New theory is a novel approach
- Page 146 and 147: Mushrooms: nang-fah mushroom (Pleur
- Page 148 and 149: - Farmers can sell their rice at a
- Page 150 and 151: In order to maintain the growth rat
- Page 152 and 153: REFERENCESAthipanan, Withaya. 1995.
- Page 154 and 155: CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN VIET NAMNgu
- Page 156 and 157:
3. PATTERNS OF CROP DIVERSIFICATION
- Page 158 and 159:
the contour with mulching using ric
- Page 160 and 161:
development of new crop varieties a
- Page 162 and 163:
• Cultivated and growing area und
- Page 164 and 165:
other hand, the size of an average
- Page 166 and 167:
4.1 Crop NutritionA major contribut
- Page 168 and 169:
increased from 130 million ha to 15
- Page 170 and 171:
in tobacco nurseries. These also he
- Page 172 and 173:
past experience. A sustainable prog
- Page 174 and 175:
diversification, taking into accoun
- Page 176 and 177:
The major outputs are:- Integration
- Page 178 and 179:
• Database and information materi
- Page 180 and 181:
• Business plans have been formul
- Page 182 and 183:
minimize such losses. The developme
- Page 184 and 185:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSBANGLADESHM. En
- Page 186 and 187:
SRI LANKAH.P.M. GunasenaDirectorPos
- Page 188 and 189:
FAOR.B. SinghAssistant Director-Gen