12.07.2015 Views

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140<strong>Biofuel</strong> <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>livestock</strong> <strong>feed</strong> – <strong>Opportunities</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>challenges</strong>can <strong>co</strong>ntaminate the product. Old material that remainsfrom previous batches should be removed <strong>as</strong> it may havemould growth <strong>and</strong> can inoculate with spores fresh batchesdeposited on top. Similarly, WDGS that h<strong>as</strong> been left outsidewith no <strong>co</strong>ver can have been subject to precipitation,which modifies its moisture <strong>co</strong>ntent <strong>and</strong> w<strong>as</strong>hes out solublenutrients before inclusion in <strong>livestock</strong> diets.If WDGS is not going to be fed to <strong>livestock</strong> within oneweek (3–4 days in summer), means of adequate storage needto be found. Covering with a weighted tarpaulin will protectWDGS from precipitation <strong>and</strong> exposure to light, but doesnot exclude air. Under these <strong>co</strong>nditions WDGS will develop adark crust approximately 5 cm thick on the surface, which itis advisable to discard upon <strong>feed</strong>-out. If WDGS is protectedfrom air infiltration (e.g. in a silo bag), it will preserve well,either alone or blended with other <strong>feed</strong>s. Due to its highmoisture <strong>co</strong>ntent <strong>and</strong> density, it is not advisable to storeWDGS in vertical structures such <strong>as</strong> silos. Storage can bee<strong>as</strong>ily ac<strong>co</strong>mplished in bunkers, <strong>co</strong>vered piles, or in silo bags.When storage is needed for prolonged periods (months),it is <strong>co</strong>nvenient to use silo bags to prevent extensive spoilage.Feeding out from bagged WDGS needs to followsimilar guidelines <strong>as</strong> <strong>feed</strong>ing silage from a bag. Removalneeds to be approximately 30 cm in depth from the entireexposed surface at le<strong>as</strong>t every other day. Unloading WDGSat the farm on a firm surface, such <strong>as</strong> <strong>co</strong>ncrete or <strong>as</strong>phalt,prevents <strong>co</strong>ntamination with soil <strong>and</strong> seepage of mineralsinto the ground. The pile should be readily <strong>co</strong>veredto protect it from precipitation <strong>and</strong>, eventually, seepage.Precipitation not only refers to rain but also snow in <strong>co</strong>ldclimates. When it leaves the ethanol plant, WDGS is usuallystill hot, with temperatures of around 60 °C not beingunusual upon arrival at the farm. If during transportationor just after unloading WDGS is snowed-upon, this temperaturewill melt the snow <strong>and</strong> nutrients will be lost withthe runoff.The method of choice for preservation depends notonly on the equipment available at the farm but also onthe number of animals to be fed daily. Small- to mediumsized<strong>livestock</strong> operations benefit the most from silo bagsbecause enough volume of WDGS can be removed fromthe exposed surface daily to keep ahead of potential spoilagelosses. Producers need to be careful not to overstretchthe bag <strong>as</strong> the lateral pressure can tear the bag open duringthe filling process.Storage of WDGS blended with foragesThe low pH of WDGS arriving from the ethanol plantis a positive factor when mixing WDGS with other<strong>feed</strong>s (Table 10). Studies <strong>co</strong>nducted at the Dairy ScienceDepartment of South Dakota State University have shownthat the pH of these blends drops proportionally to thebuffer effect <strong>and</strong>/or original pH of the <strong>co</strong>mpanion <strong>feed</strong>stuff.The pH of most dry <strong>feed</strong>s is neutral at best, <strong>and</strong> mixingthem 50:50 on a dry b<strong>as</strong>is with WDGS reduces the pH ofthe blend to approximately pH 4. When <strong>co</strong>mpaction <strong>and</strong>air exclusion are adequate, this acidity supports adequatepreservation. In fact, WDGS preserves perfectly well on itsown without the need for such blends, but the blends helppreserve other <strong>feed</strong>s that otherwise would require an additionalstorage structure.Feeds that can ideally be mixed with WDGS are thosedeficient in the nutrients that WDGS supplies in excess.Feeds low in protein, fat <strong>and</strong> phosphorus are desirable<strong>co</strong>mpanions because those nutrients are <strong>co</strong>ncentrated inWDGS. Examples of such <strong>feed</strong>s are soybean hulls, beetpulp, citrus pulp <strong>and</strong> crop residues such <strong>as</strong> maize stalks <strong>and</strong>small-grain straws. One additional advantage of the blendwith dry residues is that the moisture in WDGS softens thestructural carbohydrates, allowing for f<strong>as</strong>ter <strong>co</strong>lonization byrumen bacteria. In addition, a practical advantage of blendingWDGS with fibrous residues is that the blend is moree<strong>as</strong>ily reduced to smaller particles during the winter, whenchunks of frozen DDGS can be difficult to in<strong>co</strong>rporate intoa total mixed ration.Research <strong>co</strong>nducted by the Dairy Science Departmentof South Dakota State University h<strong>as</strong> demonstrated that tobe able to achieve adequate air exclusion through <strong>co</strong>mpactionthose blends should not exceed 50 percent DM. If thisre<strong>co</strong>mmendation is to be followed then using “modified”WDGS (50 percent DM) would only work in blends withhigh moisture <strong>feed</strong>stuffs such <strong>as</strong> green chopped forages(e.g. maize plants). At the same time, the original WDGSwith 60 to 70 percent moisture would work better inblends with drier <strong>feed</strong>s. From this perspective, the genericterm “wet cake” is not descriptive enough <strong>and</strong> producersTABLE 10Wet distillers grain preserved in silo bagsParameterDay0 3 7 14 129 SEM1pH 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 0.04<strong>as</strong> % DMAcetic acid 0 0 0.11 0.30 0.23 0.16Propionic acid 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.30 0.33 0.02Lactic acid 0.90 0.95 0.97 1.02 0.98 0.02Notes: SEM = St<strong>and</strong>ard error of mean. Source: Mjoun, Kalscheur <strong>and</strong> Garcia, 2011.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!