Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Co-products from biofuel production for farm animals – an EU perspective 223context. Well-to-tank report version 2c. EuropeanCommission Joint Research Centre. Available at http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/media/WTW_Report_010307.pdfAccessed 09 July 2011.Crutzen, P.J., Mosier, A.R., Smith, K.A. & Winiwarter,W. 2008. N 2 O release from agro-biofuel productionnegates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8: 389–395.Dänicke, S. 1999. Zum Einfluss von Nicht-Stärke-Polysaccharariden (NSP) und NSP-spaltenden Enzymen aufdie Passagezeit der Inmgesta sowie den Energie- undProteinumsatz von wachsenden Schweinen und Broilern.Übersichten zur Tierernährung, 27: 221–273.Dalibard, P., Gady, C. & Kratz, R. 2008. Nutritional evaluationof a corn distiller dried grain with solubles in layersand potential benefit of NSP supplementation on energydigestibility. p. 157 (Abstract), in: Proc. 10th TagungSchweine- und Geflügelernährung. 18–20 November 2008.Halle, Wittenberg, Germany.Damme, K. & Peganova, S. 2006. Legehennenfütterung.Einsatz getrockneter Weizenschlempe. DGS-Magazin,58(18): 23–30.DeFrain, J.M., Hippen, A.R., Kalscheur, K.F. & Jardon, P.W.2004. Feeding glycerol to transition dairy cows: Effects onblood metabolites and lactation performance. Journal ofDairy Science, 87: 4195–4206.Degussa Feed Additives. 1996. The amino acid compositionof feedstuffs: Degussa, Hanau, Germany.Dunkel, S. 2011. Fütterung von getrockneter Weizenschlempean Milchkühe. Available at http://www.lfl.bayern.de/ite/rind/14695/linkurl_0_4.pdf Accessed 06 July 2011.EEA [European Environment Agency]. 2008. AnnualEuropean GHG inventory 1990–2006 and inventory report2008. Technical Report, No. 6. Copenhagen, Denmark.Engelhard, T. 2011. Einsatz von Pressschlempe in Rationen fürKühe. Available at http://www.lfl.bayern.de/ite/rind/14695/linkurl_0_2.pdf Accessed 06 July 2011.Engelhard, T., Meyer, A., Staufenbiel, R. & Kanitz, W.2006. Vergleich des Einsatzes von Propylenglykol undGlyzerin in Rationen für Hochleistungskühe. pp. 26–29,in: Forum angewandte Forschung in der Rinder- undSchweinefütterung. Fulda, Germany, 5–6 April 2006.Verband der Landwirt schafts kammern, Bonn, Germany.Ettle, T., Obermaier, A., Preißinger, W., Hitzlsperger,L., Meiser, H., Spiekers, H. & Potthast, C. 2009.Einsatz getrockneter Getreideschlempe (Weizen, Gerste,Zucker), Raps- oder Sojaextraktionsschrot in der intensivenMast von Bullen der Rasse Fleckvieh. pp. 58–62, in:Forum angewandte Forschung in der Rinder- undSchweinefütterung, Fulda, Germany, 1-2 April 2009.Verband der Landwirtschaftskammern, Bonn, Germany.Faghani, M. & Kheiri, F. 2007. The effect of canola mealson the performance of broiler chicks. pp. 285–288, in:Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress,Wuhan, China.Ferraro, S.M., Mendoza, G.D., Miranda, L.A. & Gutiérrez,C.G. 2009. In vitro gas production and ruminal fermentationof glycerol, propylene glycol and molasses. Animal FeedScience and Technology, 154: 112–118.Firkins, J.L., Berger, L.L. & Fahey, G.C. Jr. 1985. Evaluationof wet and dry distillers grains and wet and dry corngluten feeds in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science,60: 847–840.Fischer, G. 2009. World food and agriculture to 2030/2050:How do climate change and bio-energy alter the long-termoutlook for food, agriculture and resource availability?In: Proceedings of the Expert Meeting on How to Feedthe World in 2050. 24–26 June 2009. FAO, Rome, Italy.49 p. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/ak542e/ak542e00.pdf Accessed 6 November 2011.Fisher, L.J., Erfle, J.D. & Sauer, F.D. 1971. Preliminaryevaluation of the addition of glucogenic materials to therations of lactating cows. Canadian Journal of AnimalScience, 51: 721–727.Fisher, L.J., Erfle, J.D., Lodge, G.A. & Sauer, F.D. 1973.Effects of propylene glycol or glycerol supplementationof the diet of dairy cows on feed intake, milk yield andcomposition, and incidence of ketosis. Canadian Journal ofAnimal Science, 53: 289–296.Flachowsky, G., Baldeweg, P., Tiroke, K., König, H. &Schneider, A. 1990. Feed value and feeding of wastelagefrom distillers grain solubles, pig slurry solids and groundstraw treated with urea and NaOH. Biological Wastes,34: 271–280.Flachowsky, G., Brade, W., Feil, A., Kamphues, J., Meyer,U. & Zehetmeier, M. 2011. Carbon (CO 2 )-Footprints fürdie Primärerzeugung von Lebensmitteln tierischer Herkunft:Datenbasis und Reduzierungspotentiale. Übersichten zurTierernährung, 39: 1–45.Forsyth, H. 1953. Glycerol in the treatment of (1) bovineacetonemia, (2) pregnancy toxaemia in ewes. VeterinaryRecord, 65: 721–727.Franke, K., Meyer, U. & Flachowsky, G. 2009. Distillersdried grains with solubles compared with rapeseed meal inrations of dairy cows. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences,18: 601–612.Friedrich, S. 2004. A worldwide review of the commercialproduction of biodiesel- a technological, economic andecological investigation based on case studies. SchriftenreiheUmweltschutz und Ressourcenökonomie, 41. Institutfür Technologie und nachhaltiges Produktmanagement,Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Vienna, Austria.GfE [Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie]. 1991.Leitlinien für die Bestimmung der Verdaulichkeit vonRohnährstoffen an Wiederkäuern: Herausgegebenvom Ausschuss für Bedarfsnormen der Gesellschaft für
224Biofuel co-products as livestock feed – Opportunities and challengesErnährungsphysiologie. Journal of Animal Physiology andAnimal Nutrition, 65: 229–234.GfE. 1995. Ausschuss für Bedarfsnormen der Gesellschaftfür Ernährungsphysiologie. Zur Energiebewertung beimWiederkäuer. Proceedings of the Society of NutritionPhysiology, 4: 121–123.GfE. 1999. Energie- und Nährstoffbedarf landwirtschaftlicherNutztiere. Nr. 7 Legehennen und Masthühner (Broiler).Frankfurt am Main, Germany, DLG-Verlag.Gralak, M.A., Kamalu, T., von Keyserlingk, M.A.G &Kulasek, G.W. 1997. Rumen dry matter and crude proteindegradability of extracted or untreated oilseeds andLeucaena leucocephala leaves. Archives of Animal Nutrition,50: 173–185.Hackl, W., Priepke, A. & Hennig, U. 2007. Bestimmungder preacecalen Protein- und Aminosäurenverdaulichkeitvon getrockneter Weizenschlempe. pp. 171–174, in:Forum angewandte Forschung, Fulda, Germany, 28–29March 2007. Verband der Landwirt schafts kammern, Bonn,Germany.Hackl, W., Priepke, A., Hennig, U. & Zeyner, A. 2007.Determination of the praecaecal digestibility of crudeprotein and amino acids in wheat-based distillers grain withsolubles relative to wheat. Proceedings of the Society forNutrition and Physiology, 16: 107 (Abstract).Hübner, K., Vahjen, W. & Simon, O. 2002. Bacterialresponses to different dietary cereal types and xylanasesupplementation in the intestine of broiler chicken. Archivesof Animal Nutrition, 56: 167–187.IEA [International Energy Agency]. 2008a. World energyoutlook 2008. OECD/IEA, Paris, France.IEA. 2008b. From 1st- to 2nd-generation biofuel technologies. Anoverview of current industry and RD&D activities. OECD/IEA,Paris, France. Available at http://www.iea.org/papers/2008/2nd_Biofuel_Gen.pdf Accessed 7 November 2011.Jensen, L.S., Falen, L. & Chang, C.H. 1974. Effect ofdistiller´s grain with solubles on reproduction and liver fataccumulation in laying hens. Poultry Science, 53: 586–592.Jensen, S.K., Olsen, H.S. & Sørensen, H. 1990. Aqueousenzymatic processing of rapeseed for production of highquality products. pp. 331–343, in: F. Shahidi (Editor).Canola and rapeseed: production, chemistry, nutrition andprocessing technology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York,USA.Jeroch, H., Flachowsky, G. & Weißbach, F. 1993.Futtermittelkunde. Fischer Verlag, Jena and Stuttgart,Germany.Jeroch, H., Jankowski, J. & Schöne F. 2008. Rapsfuttermittelin der Broiler- und Legehennenfütterung [Rapeseed productsin the feeding of broiler and laying hens]. Archiv furGeflügelkunde, 72(2): 49–55.Johnson, R.B. 1954. The treatment of ketosis with glyceroland propylene glycol. Cornell Veterinarian, 44: 6–21.Kalscheur, K.F., Garcia, A.D., Schingoethe, D.J., Royón,F.D. & Hippen, A.R. 2012. This volume.Kellner, O. 1905. Die Ernährung der landwirtschaftlichenNutztiere. Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany.Kendall, E.M., Ingalls, J.R. & Boila, R.J. 1991. Variabilityin the rumen degradability and post-ruminal digestion ofthe dry matter, nitrogen and amino acids of canola meal.Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 71: 739–754.Khalili, H., Varvikko, T., Toivonen, V., Hissa, K. & Suvitie,M. 1997. The effects of added glycerol or unprotected freefatty acids or a combination of the two on silage intake,milk production, rumen fermentation and diet digestibilityin cows given grass silage based diets. Agricultural and FoodScience in Finland, 6(5-6): 349–362.Khorasani, G.R., Robinson, P.H. & Kennelly, J.J. 1994.Evaluation of solvent and expeller linseed meals as proteinsources for dairy cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,74: 479–485.Kijora, C., Bergner, H., Götz, K.-P., Bartelt, J., Szakács, J.& Sommer, A. 1998. Research note: Investigation on themetabolizm of glycerol in the rumen of bulls. Archives ofAnimal Nutrition, 51: 341–348.Kling, M. 1928. Die Handelsfuttermittel. Ulmer, Stuttgart,Germany.Kling, M. & Wöhlbier, W. 1983. Handelsfuttermittel. Ulmer,Stuttgart, Germany.Klopfenstein, T.P., Erickson, G.E. & Bremer, V.R. 2008.Board-invited review: Use of distillers co-products in thebeef cattle feeding industry. Journal of Animal Science,86: 1223–1231.Kluge, H. & Kluth, H. 2008. Einsatz der GetreideschlempeProtiGrain bei Schweinen und Geflügel. pp. 119–122,in: Proceedings of the 10th Tagung Schweine- undGeflügelernährung, Halle/Saale, Germany.Kluth, H., Wolf, E. & Rodehutscord, M. 2009.Untersuchungen zum Gehalt an ME und praecaecalverdaulichen Aminosäuren von Getreidetrockenschlempebeim Broiler. VDLUFA-Schriftenreihe, 64: 142–148.Krueger, N.A., Anderson, R.C., Tedeschi, L.O., Callaway,T.R., Edringtion, T.S. & Nisbet, D.J. 2010. Evaluationof feeding glycerol on free-fatty acid production andfermentation kinetics of mixed ruminal microbes in vitro.Bioresource Technology, 101: 8469–8472.Lindermayer, H. 2004. Weizenschlempe in derSchweinefütterung. ITE 2, Landesanstalt für LandwirtschaftGrub. Poing, Germany, Institut für Tierernährung undFutterwirtschaft.Liu,Y.-G., Steg, A. & Hindle, V. 1994. Rumen degradationand intestinal digestion of crambe and other oilseedco-products in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science andTechnology, 45: 397–409.Löwe, R. 1999. Processing-specific consequences of the use ofglycerine. Kraftfutter/Feed Magazine, 82: 394–402.
Page 1 and 2:
BIOFUEL CO-PRODUCTS AS LIVESTOCK FE
Page 3:
Recommended citationFAO. 2012. Biof
Page 6 and 7:
vco-products to swine - Feeding cru
Page 8 and 9:
viiCHAPTER 22Use of Pongamia glabra
Page 10 and 11:
ixPrefaceHumans are faced with majo
Page 13 and 14:
xiiCBMCBSCCDSCCKCDOCDSCFCFBCFRCGECI
Page 15 and 16:
xivHCHOHClHCNHisH-JPKMHMCHPDDGHPDDG
Page 17 and 18:
xviPPbPCVPDPEMPFADPhePJPKCPKEPKMPKO
Page 19 and 20:
xviiiWBPWCGFWDGWDGSWDGSHWPCWTWWWNSK
Page 21 and 22:
2Biofuel co-products as livestock f
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
10Biofuel co-products as livestock
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 54 and 55:
35Chapter 3Impact of United States
Page 56 and 57:
Impact of United States biofuels co
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 120 and 121:
101Chapter 6Hydrogen sulphide: synt
Page 122 and 123:
Hydrogen sulphide in cattle fed co-
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 174 and 175:
155Chapter 8Utilization of crude gl
Page 176 and 177:
Utilization of crude glycerin in be
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192: 172Biofuel co-products as livestock
Page 228 and 229: 209Chapter 11Co-products from biofu
Page 230 and 231: Co-products from biofuel production
Page 246: Co-products from biofuel production
Page 294 and 295:
275Chapter 15Sustainable and compet
Page 296 and 297:
Sustainable and competitive use of
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
291Chapter 16Scope for utilizing su
Page 312 and 313:
Scope for utilizing sugar cane baga
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
303Chapter 17Camelina sativa in pou
Page 324 and 325:
Camelina sativa in poultry diets: o
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
311Chapter 18Utilization of lipid c
Page 332 and 333:
Utilization of lipid co-products of
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 370 and 371:
351Chapter 21Use of detoxified jatr
Page 372 and 373:
Use of detoxified jatropha kernel m
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
379Chapter 22Use of Pongamia glabra
Page 400 and 401:
Use of Pongamia glabra (karanj) and
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
403Chapter 23Co-products of the Uni
Page 424 and 425:
Co-products of the United States bi
Page 426 and 427:
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 486 and 487:
467Chapter 26An assessment of the p
Page 488 and 489:
An assessment of the potential dema
Page 490 and 491:
Page 492 and 493:
Page 494 and 495:
Page 496 and 497:
Page 498 and 499:
Page 500 and 501:
Page 502 and 503:
483Chapter 27Biofuels: their co-pro
Page 504 and 505:
Biofuels: their co-products and wat
Page 506 and 507:
Page 508 and 509:
Page 510 and 511:
Page 512 and 513:
Page 514 and 515:
Page 516 and 517:
Page 518 and 519:
Page 520 and 521:
501Chapter 28Utilization of co-prod
Page 522 and 523:
Utilization of co-products of the b
Page 524 and 525:
Page 526 and 527:
Page 528 and 529:
Page 530 and 531:
Page 532 and 533:
Page 534 and 535:
Page 536 and 537:
Page 538 and 539:
Page 540 and 541:
Page 542 and 543:
523Contributing authorsSouheila Abb
Page 544 and 545:
Contributing authors 525for the Fee
Page 546 and 547:
Contributing authors 527Friederike
Page 548 and 549:
Contributing authors 529Sustainable
Page 550 and 551:
Contributing authors 531During the
Page 552:
Contributing authors 533(Hons.) and
show all

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?