Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Use of palm kernel cakes, co-products of the biofuel industry, in collared peccary feeds 267TABLE 6Average features of the commercial cuts removed from thecold, left half-carcass of the collared peccaries slaughteredafter the termination phaseParameterLevels of babassu cake in the feed (%)0 20 40 60 SERibs (g) 1320 1147 1147 1413 186.6Gammon (g) 1428 1420 1468 1555 80.2Shoulder blade (g) 967 953 943 1028 67.7% Gammon (1) 30.6 32.4 35.3 37.2 3.4Notes: SE = Standard error. (1) % of gammon in relation to the leftside cold half carcass. Source: Albuquerque, 2006.TABLE 7Average percentages of organs and glands in relation tothe carcass of the collared peccaries slaughtered after theterminal phaseParameterInclusion levels of babassu cake in the feed (%)0 20 40 60 SEStomach (%) 5.0 4.7 5.2 4.0 0.65Heart (%) 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.08Lung (%) 1.3 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.11Liver (%) 2.1 2.7 2.5 2.2 0.19Spleen (%) 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.24Kidneys (%) 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.07Intestines (%) 5.9 8.2 7.3 6.5 0.93Total (%) 16.6 19.7 18.3 15.3 1.73Notes: SE = Standard error. Source: Albuquerque, 2006.carcass. In the diet with an inclusion level of 40 percentbabassu cake, the increase was 2.8 percent for gammonand 15.4 percent for percentage of gammon in relation tothe cold, left half-carcass.Silva et al. (2002) studied the effect of different inclusionlevels of CP in the feed on carcass and meat of collared peccariesslaughtered after the terminal phase, and found nosignificant differences (P >0.05) for the carcass parametersstudied. Similar to observations of Albuquerque (2006),the average dressing percentage was between 56.88 and59.47 percent. The percentage of gammon in relation tothe carcass was between 35.0 and 38.2 percent, showingslightly higher values than reported in Albuquerque (2006).Some bovine data for dressing percentage were poorerwhen compared with that of collared peccaries reported byAlbuquerque (2006), such as the data found by Schwarzet al. (1993), who found average dressing percentages ofbetween 57.7 and 58.4 percent, and Holzer et al., (1999),who reported an average dressing percentage between55.4 and 57.4 percent. The inclusion of different levels ofbabassu cake showed no significant differences (P >0.05) inthe values for organs and glands (Table 7).Meat properties and fatty acids profile in thecollared peccary gammonAlbuquerque et al. (2009) studied the organolepticproperties (cooking losses, shearing force, pH and waterholding capacity) of gammon from 12 collared peccaries,and the fatty acid (FA) profile of the oil extracted from themeat. No significant differences (P >0.05) were observedin meat properties, and unsaturated FA (mono- and polyunsaturates)were more frequent than saturated fatty acidsin the collared peccary gammon meat. When comparing themeat from collared peccaries, bovines, ovines and swine,the collared peccary had more unsaturated FA (mono- andpoly unsaturates) than saturated FA. The FA poly unsaturatesare responsible for a reduction in cholesterol blood levels(Monteiro, Mondini and Costa, 2000), suggesting that themeat from the collared peccary is a healthy source of animalprotein (Albuquerque et al., 2009).PALM KERNEL CAKE (ELAEIS GUINEENSIS) USEIN THE FEED OF COLLARED PECCARIES RAISEDIN CAPTIVITYThe use of oil palm cake in the diet has been studied invarious animal species: fish – Pieractus mesopotamicus andOreochromis niloticus (Oliveira et al., 1997, 2008; Pascoal,Miranda and Silva-Filho, 2006.); chicken (Onwudike, 1986,1988; Farias-Filho et al., 2006); and in swine (Rhule, 1996;Gómez, Benavides and Diaz, 2007.).Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, in partnership withthe Universidade Federal do Pará, embarked on aresearch project (PROFAMA, 2008) that evaluated theperformance of collared peccaries bred in captivity ondiets of oil palm kernel cake as an alternative feedsource. Animal performances (daily weight gain anddaily feed intake), the characteristics of the carcass andthe non-carcass components were observed, and thebacterial microbiota in the gastro-intestinal tract of theseanimals was studied.Forty male animals were used, aged between 8 and10 months, in their final growth phase and weighing anaverage of 13.20 kg. During the experiment, the animalsreceived varying levels of oil palm cake (T1 = 0% cake; T2= 7.5% cake; T3 = 15% cake; and T4 = 22.5% cake). Theproximate analysis of the feed is shown in Table 8, and thenutritional analysis in Table 9.At the end of each experimental phase, the animalswere slaughtered to evaluate the effects of the feed utilizedon the carcass and non-carcass characteristics (gammonand carcass dressing percentage, head, hide, blood, feet,carcass length, organs and glands, and commercial cuts)and live weight and fasting weight.The results observed in the feed with the inclusion ofoil palm cake demonstrated that its use in the diet of thecollared peccary in an intensive breeding system could be aregional low-cost nutritional component.Rhule (1996) studied the effect of breed on the growthof swine with varying levels of oil palm cake in the feed,and observed more weight gain in swine than in collared
268Biofuel co-products as livestock feed – Opportunities and challengesTABLE 8Chemical characteristics (percentage basis) of the experimental feedIngredient DM MM P CF CP Ca EE NDF ADF NaSoy bran (1) 88.1 6.6 0.6 5.92 45.54 0.3 1.4 14.1 7.8 0.1Maize (1) 87.1 1.3 0.2 1.95 8.57
Page 1 and 2:
BIOFUEL CO-PRODUCTS AS LIVESTOCK FE
Page 3:
Recommended citationFAO. 2012. Biof
Page 6 and 7:
vco-products to swine - Feeding cru
Page 8 and 9:
viiCHAPTER 22Use of Pongamia glabra
Page 10 and 11:
ixPrefaceHumans are faced with majo
Page 13 and 14:
xiiCBMCBSCCDSCCKCDOCDSCFCFBCFRCGECI
Page 15 and 16:
xivHCHOHClHCNHisH-JPKMHMCHPDDGHPDDG
Page 17 and 18:
xviPPbPCVPDPEMPFADPhePJPKCPKEPKMPKO
Page 19 and 20:
xviiiWBPWCGFWDGWDGSWDGSHWPCWTWWWNSK
Page 21 and 22:
2Biofuel co-products as livestock f
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
10Biofuel co-products as livestock
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 54 and 55:
35Chapter 3Impact of United States
Page 56 and 57:
Impact of United States biofuels co
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 120 and 121:
101Chapter 6Hydrogen sulphide: synt
Page 122 and 123:
Hydrogen sulphide in cattle fed co-
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 174 and 175:
155Chapter 8Utilization of crude gl
Page 176 and 177:
Utilization of crude glycerin in be
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 228 and 229:
209Chapter 11Co-products from biofu
Page 230 and 231:
Co-products from biofuel production
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237: Co-products from biofuel production
Page 246: Co-products from biofuel production
Page 249 and 250: 230Biofuel co-products as livestock
Page 285: 266Biofuel co-products as livestock
Page 294 and 295: 275Chapter 15Sustainable and compet
Page 296 and 297: Sustainable and competitive use of
Page 310 and 311: 291Chapter 16Scope for utilizing su
Page 312 and 313: Scope for utilizing sugar cane baga
Page 322 and 323: 303Chapter 17Camelina sativa in pou
Page 324 and 325: Camelina sativa in poultry diets: o
Page 330 and 331: 311Chapter 18Utilization of lipid c
Page 332 and 333: Utilization of lipid co-products of
Page 334 and 335: Utilization of lipid co-products of
Page 336 and 337:
Utilization of lipid co-products of
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 370 and 371:
351Chapter 21Use of detoxified jatr
Page 372 and 373:
Use of detoxified jatropha kernel m
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
379Chapter 22Use of Pongamia glabra
Page 400 and 401:
Use of Pongamia glabra (karanj) and
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
403Chapter 23Co-products of the Uni
Page 424 and 425:
Co-products of the United States bi
Page 426 and 427:
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 486 and 487:
467Chapter 26An assessment of the p
Page 488 and 489:
An assessment of the potential dema
Page 490 and 491:
Page 492 and 493:
Page 494 and 495:
Page 496 and 497:
Page 498 and 499:
Page 500 and 501:
Page 502 and 503:
483Chapter 27Biofuels: their co-pro
Page 504 and 505:
Biofuels: their co-products and wat
Page 506 and 507:
Page 508 and 509:
Page 510 and 511:
Page 512 and 513:
Page 514 and 515:
Page 516 and 517:
Page 518 and 519:
Page 520 and 521:
501Chapter 28Utilization of co-prod
Page 522 and 523:
Utilization of co-products of the b
Page 524 and 525:
Page 526 and 527:
Page 528 and 529:
Page 530 and 531:
Page 532 and 533:
Page 534 and 535:
Page 536 and 537:
Page 538 and 539:
Page 540 and 541:
Page 542 and 543:
523Contributing authorsSouheila Abb
Page 544 and 545:
Contributing authors 525for the Fee
Page 546 and 547:
Contributing authors 527Friederike
Page 548 and 549:
Contributing authors 529Sustainable
Page 550 and 551:
Contributing authors 531During the
Page 552:
Contributing authors 533(Hons.) and
show all

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?