12.07.2015 Views

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

77Chapter 5Utilization of <strong>feed</strong> <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> from wet ordry milling for beef cattleG.E. Erickson, T.J. Klopfenstein <strong>and</strong> A.K. WatsonDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebr<strong>as</strong>ka-Lin<strong>co</strong>ln, C220 Animal Science Lin<strong>co</strong>ln, Nebr<strong>as</strong>ka 68583-0908, United States of AmericaE-mail for <strong>co</strong>rrespondence: gerickson4@unl.eduABSTRACTRecent expansion of the ethanol industry h<strong>as</strong> led to an incre<strong>as</strong>e in production of <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> that are used extensivelyin the cattle industry. A variety of different <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> are being produced, all with slightly different nutrient<strong>co</strong>mpositions. Maize [<strong>co</strong>rn] gluten <strong>feed</strong> (CGF) is the main <strong>co</strong>-product of the wet milling industry, while distillersgrains with solubles (DGS) is the main <strong>feed</strong> produced by dry milling plants. These <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> have little to nostarch remaining, which reduces acidosis <strong>challenges</strong> in <strong>feed</strong>lot cattle <strong>and</strong> reduces negative <strong>as</strong>sociative effects ofstarch digestion on fibre digestion for cattle on high forage diets. The extent to which an ethanol plant dries these<strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> affects their nutritional value. For <strong>feed</strong>lot cattle, wet DGS (WDGS) have a <strong>feed</strong>ing value 30–40 percentgreater than maize when included at 10–40 percent of diet DM. Modified <strong>and</strong> dried DGS have <strong>feed</strong>ing values15–30 percent <strong>and</strong> 13 percent greater than maize, respectively. Because <strong>feed</strong>ing DGS results in improved cattleperformance, cattle can be fed for fewer days resulting in decre<strong>as</strong>ed <strong>co</strong>sts. Feeding high levels of DGS incre<strong>as</strong>esthe sulphur <strong>co</strong>ntent of diets <strong>and</strong> may decre<strong>as</strong>e performance or result in polio encephalo malacia (PEM), particularlyif sulphur levels exceed 0.47 percent of diet DM. Incre<strong>as</strong>ing roughage levels in the diet appears to be an effectiveway of minimizing sulphur impacts <strong>and</strong> maintaining cattle performance. In addition, lower quality roughages <strong>co</strong>uldbe fed in <strong>feed</strong>lot diets <strong>co</strong>ntaining WDGS without diminishing performance. Intense maize processing incre<strong>as</strong>es thevalue of diets <strong>co</strong>ntaining CGF. However, greater performance responses have been seen with less intensely processedmaize in diets <strong>co</strong>ntaining DGS. There appear to be many <strong>co</strong>mplex interactions that cause these differencesin performance, <strong>and</strong> warrant further study.The environmental impacts of these <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> are quite important. The ideal scenario for reducing greenhouseg<strong>as</strong> (GHG) emissions of ethanol involves <strong>feed</strong>ing WDGS to <strong>feed</strong>lot cattle within 100 km of the ethanolplant. In this scenario, GHG emissions can be reduced by 56–62 percent <strong>co</strong>mpared with g<strong>as</strong>oline due to improvedcattle performance <strong>and</strong> decre<strong>as</strong>ed energy <strong>co</strong>sts at the ethanol plant when DGS is not dried. Feeding high levelsof <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>es nitrogen (N) <strong>and</strong> phosphorous (P) in the diet, which incre<strong>as</strong>es the N <strong>and</strong> P <strong>co</strong>ntent of themanure. Capturing these nutrients in the manure <strong>and</strong> applying to crop l<strong>and</strong> <strong>as</strong> fertilizer incre<strong>as</strong>es the value of themanure above the <strong>co</strong>sts to apply it. These <strong>co</strong>-product <strong>feed</strong>s are an excellent source of energy, protein <strong>and</strong> P forcattle on high forage diets, <strong>and</strong> quadratic incre<strong>as</strong>es in average daily gain (ADG) <strong>and</strong> final bodyweight (BW) havebeen observed with incre<strong>as</strong>ing levels of DGS supplementation.INTRODUCTIONTwo primary types of grain milling processes currently exist,resulting in quite different <strong>feed</strong> <strong>products</strong>. These processingplants produce <strong>and</strong> market a variety of <strong>feed</strong> <strong>products</strong>, butin general, the dry milling process produces distillers grainswith solubles (DGS), <strong>and</strong> the wet milling process producesmaize gluten <strong>feed</strong> (CGF). These <strong>feed</strong>s can be marketed <strong>as</strong>wet <strong>feed</strong>s, or they can be dried <strong>and</strong> marketed <strong>as</strong> either drymaize gluten <strong>feed</strong> (DCGF) or dried distillers grains (DDG)with or without solubles. The majority of ethanol plantexpansions are dry milling plants that produce DGS; however,an incre<strong>as</strong>e in supply of wet maize gluten <strong>feed</strong> (WCGF) isalso expected. Therefore, these <strong>feed</strong>s may be very attractivefor beef producers to use <strong>as</strong> <strong>feed</strong> sources. This report willfocus on the production, <strong>co</strong>mposition, <strong>feed</strong>ing values <strong>and</strong>environmental issues of using these <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> in bothgrowing <strong>and</strong> finishing beef cattle diets. Management strategieswill be discussed <strong>as</strong> well, including type of grain, grainprocessing, roughage levels <strong>and</strong> the effects of fat, protein,phosphorus (P) <strong>and</strong> sulphur (S) with these <strong>products</strong>.Wet millingWet milling is a process that requires the use of high quality(U.S. No. 2 or better) maize, <strong>and</strong> fractionates the maize

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!