12.07.2015 Views

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50<strong>Biofuel</strong> <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>livestock</strong> <strong>feed</strong> – <strong>Opportunities</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>challenges</strong>The process of producing ethanol from algae beginswith growing starch-accumulating, filament-forming or<strong>co</strong>lony-forming algae in an aquaculture environment. Afterthe algae have been grown, they are harvested to providebiom<strong>as</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> de<strong>co</strong>mposition of the biom<strong>as</strong>s initiated. Thede<strong>co</strong>mposition process can be done mechanically or nonmechanicallyto rupture the cells. Ye<strong>as</strong>t is added to thebiom<strong>as</strong>s to begin fermentation <strong>and</strong> <strong>co</strong>nvert carbohydratesto ethanol. Ethanol is then harvested after fermentationis <strong>co</strong>mplete. It is not known if the residual biom<strong>as</strong>s fromalgae bio-ethanol production will have significant <strong>feed</strong>ingvalue for animals. Additionally, there is research underwayto determine the fe<strong>as</strong>ibility of producing ethanol from seaweed,<strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> <strong>co</strong>mbining cellulosic ethanol <strong>and</strong> biodieseltechnology in an attempt to gain greater efficiencies inbiofuels production than from those processes currentlybeing used.FEED AND FOOD SAFETY QUESTIONSWe are at a critical point in history, where intelligent decisionsneed to be made not only about the need to <strong>co</strong>ntinueto develop <strong>and</strong> use new food production technology to<strong>feed</strong> the world, but also to provide realistic risk <strong>as</strong>sessmentof any potential short- <strong>and</strong> long-term <strong>co</strong>nsequences ofusing these technologies. For example, some <strong>co</strong>untries haveembraced the use of genetically modified grains in animal<strong>feed</strong>s <strong>and</strong> re<strong>co</strong>gnize them <strong>as</strong> safe. In <strong>co</strong>ntr<strong>as</strong>t, other <strong>co</strong>untrieshave been reluctant to accept the use of this technology,which <strong>co</strong>nsequently limits their choices <strong>and</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>esthe <strong>co</strong>st of food.Several characteristics of DG have been identified <strong>as</strong>potential animal or human health risk factors. However,knowledge, tools <strong>and</strong> product options exist to mitigate oreliminate many or all of the potential risk factors discussedin this section.Genetically modified grainsApproximately 98 percent of the maize produced in theUnited States is from genetically modified varieties. Farmersprefer to grow these varieties because of their better yields,whether e<strong>co</strong>nomic or agronomic. As a result, maize seed<strong>co</strong>mpanies are <strong>co</strong>ntinually developing new geneticallymodified maize varieties that possess e<strong>co</strong>nomically importantagronomic traits. For example, a new genetically modifiedmaize variety (Event 3272, rele<strong>as</strong>ed <strong>as</strong> cv. Enogen) h<strong>as</strong>been developed by Syngenta Seeds, Inc., with the goals ofimproving ethanol yields while reducing energy <strong>co</strong>sts <strong>and</strong>greenhouse g<strong>as</strong> emissions. The use of Enogen grain byUnited States ethanol producers <strong>co</strong>uld provide a 380 millionlitre ethanol plant with annual efficiency improvementsthat save 1.7 million litres of water, 1.3 GWh of electricity<strong>and</strong> 244 billion BTUs of natural g<strong>as</strong>, which is equivalentto the amount of power needed to heat several thous<strong>and</strong>homes, while reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 48 000tonne. These are all very positive. Syngenta requestedthat the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)Animal <strong>and</strong> Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) grantnon-regulated status to its alpha-amyl<strong>as</strong>e maize (‘Event3272’) in 2005. It w<strong>as</strong> approved by the US Food <strong>and</strong> DrugAdministration (FDA) for human food <strong>co</strong>nsumption in2007, <strong>and</strong> in February 2011 APHIS announced its decisionto deregulate this new variety of maize, which h<strong>as</strong> nowbeen cleared by USDA for production. However, it is importantto re<strong>co</strong>gnize that only a few thous<strong>and</strong> acres have beenplanted with this new maize cultivar, <strong>and</strong> only a few ethanolplants are involved in evaluating its potential benefits.What will be the acceptance of the maize by-<strong>products</strong> for<strong>feed</strong> use in <strong>co</strong>untries outside of the United States?SulphurSulphur is an essential mineral for animals <strong>and</strong> servesmany important biological functions in the animal’s body.However, when excess sulphur is present in ruminant diets,neurological problems can occur. When <strong>feed</strong> <strong>and</strong> water <strong>co</strong>ntaininghigh levels of sulphur (>0.40 percent of diet DM) arefed to ruminants, a <strong>co</strong>ndition called polio encephalomalacia(PEM) can occur. PEM is caused by necrosis of the cerebro<strong>co</strong>rticalregion of the brain of cattle, sheep <strong>and</strong> goats, <strong>and</strong>if not treated with thiamin within 48 hours after the onsetof this <strong>co</strong>ndition, animals will die. Ruminants are more vulnerableto PEM when their diets are abruptly changed frombeing primarily forage to primarily grain b<strong>as</strong>ed, causing <strong>as</strong>hift in rumen microbial populations to produce thiamin<strong>as</strong>e,resulting in a thiamin deficiency. Sulphur appears to havea significant role <strong>and</strong> interaction with thiamin<strong>as</strong>e productionto cause this <strong>co</strong>ndition, but the mechanism is not wellunderstood (Boyles, 2007). This <strong>co</strong>ndition does not occur innon-ruminant animals (pigs, poultry, fish).Sulphur levels can be highly variable among DDGSsources <strong>and</strong> can range from 0.31 to 1.93 percent (average0.69 percent) on a DM b<strong>as</strong>is. Sulphuric acid is <strong>co</strong>mmonlyadded during the dry-grind ethanol production processto keep pH at desirable levels for optimal ye<strong>as</strong>t propagation<strong>and</strong> fermentation to <strong>co</strong>nvert starch to ethanol, <strong>and</strong>is used because of its lower <strong>co</strong>st relative to other acids.Ac<strong>co</strong>rding to AAFCO Official Publication 2004, p. 386,sulphuric acid is generally re<strong>co</strong>gnized <strong>as</strong> safe ac<strong>co</strong>rding toUS Code of Federal Regulation (21 CFR 582) <strong>and</strong> is listed<strong>as</strong> an approved food additive (21 CFR 573). In addition,maize naturally <strong>co</strong>ntains about 0.12 percent sulphur, <strong>and</strong>this is <strong>co</strong>ncentrated three times like all other nutrientswhen maize is used to produce ethanol <strong>and</strong> DDGS. Ye<strong>as</strong>talso <strong>co</strong>ntains about 3.9 g/kg sulphur, <strong>and</strong> naturally createssulphites during fermentation.Table 8 shows examples of the impact on final dietsulphur levels of adding different dietary levels of DDGS,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!