12.07.2015 Views

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Co-<strong>products</strong> from biofuel production for farm animals – an EU perspective 211TABLE 1Composition (g/kg dry matter unless stated) of distillery <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> (fresh <strong>and</strong> dried) of various originsSource of <strong>co</strong>-product Water (g/kg) Crude proteinCrude fat(Ether extract)Crude fibre N-free extractives AshCereal grains,unspecified, dried75 235 75 134 415 66Maize grain, fresh 913 20 9 8 45 5Dried 86 285 107 102 401 22Mol<strong>as</strong>ses, fresh 922 19 – – 40 19Rye grain, fresh 922 17 4 7 46 4Dried 100 165 82 162 478 13Potatoes, fresh 943 12 1 6 31 7Dried 100 243 37 95 408 117Source: Kellner, 1905.TABLE 2Mean digestibility <strong>co</strong>efficients (ranges in parentheses) of distillery <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> for ruminants <strong>and</strong> pigsSource of <strong>co</strong>-product Organic matter Crude proteinCrude fat (Etherextract)N-free extractCrude fibreRuminantsCereals grains, general 0.710(0.600–0.810)Maize grain 0.690(0.660–0.720)Rye grain 0.570(0.450–0.680)0.640(0.490–0.800)0.640(0.610–0.670)0.590(0.520–0.650)0.940(0.920–0.940)0.930(0.910–0.950)0.620(0.600–0.640)0.800(0.540–0.850)0.700(0.700–0.710)0.490(0.440–0.540)0.610(0.410–0.920)0.670(0.640–0.700)0.500(0.370–0.620)PigsCereal grains, general 0.580 0.780 0.560 0.510 0.360Source: Kellner, 1905.the same author calculated the <strong>co</strong>mposition of DGS. Inhis famous textbook The Nutrition of Domestic Animals,Kellner (1905) summarized the <strong>co</strong>mposition (Table 1),digestibility (Table 2) <strong>and</strong> starch units for different <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong>of ethanol production.Developments in distilling technology with <strong>co</strong>nsequencesfor <strong>co</strong>mposition <strong>and</strong> nutritive value of DGS during thel<strong>as</strong>t century were reported in several scientific publications(e.g. Naesi, 1985; Askbrant <strong>and</strong> Thomke, 1986),in animal <strong>feed</strong>ing (e.g. Jensen, Falen <strong>and</strong> Chang, 1974;Firkins, Berger <strong>and</strong> Fahey, 1985), <strong>as</strong> substrate for ensiling(e.g. Abrams et al., 1983, Flachowsky et al., 1990) <strong>and</strong>were summarized in various textbooks in Germany (e.g.Kling, 1928; Nehring, 1949; Becker <strong>and</strong> Nehring, 1967;Kling <strong>and</strong> Wöhlbier, 1983; Menke <strong>and</strong> Huss, 1987; Jeroch,Flachowsky <strong>and</strong> Weißbach, 1993).Due to the high dem<strong>and</strong> for liquid fuels throughoutEurope <strong>and</strong> the decre<strong>as</strong>ing availability of fuels from fossilsources, the production of biofuel, including bio-ethanol,h<strong>as</strong> gained more importance. The incre<strong>as</strong>ed productioncapacity <strong>and</strong> the incre<strong>as</strong>ing number of large biofuel plantsh<strong>as</strong> resulted in large amounts of DGS. It is unrealistic todistribute large quantities of DGS beyond the immediatevicinity of a biofuel plant. Due to the short shelf life ofDGS, a large proportion is dried <strong>and</strong> used <strong>as</strong> dried distillersgrain with solubles (DDGS). The nutritional quality of DGS<strong>and</strong> DDGS varies <strong>co</strong>nsiderably, reflecting the variability ofthe <strong>feed</strong>stocks, the diversity of the production processes<strong>and</strong> the proportion of solubles that are included in the finalproduct (Belyea, Rausch <strong>and</strong> Tumbleson, 2004; Los<strong>and</strong> etal., 2009; Zijlstra <strong>and</strong> Beltranena, 2009). Intensive researchon the use of distillers grain—mostly maize-b<strong>as</strong>ed—in <strong>livestock</strong>h<strong>as</strong> been <strong>co</strong>nducted in North America over the p<strong>as</strong>tyears (reviewed i.a. by Klopfenstein, Erickson <strong>and</strong> Bremer,2008; Schingoethe et al., 2009). However, experiments thatexamine the nutritional value of DDGS <strong>co</strong>mmon in Europe,b<strong>as</strong>ed on wheat, barley or rye, or mixtures of these grains,are rare (Franke, Meyer <strong>and</strong> Flachowsky, 2009; Aldai et al.,2010; Meyer et al., 2010; Noblet et al., this volume).Nutritive value <strong>and</strong> <strong>feed</strong>ing to ruminantsThe chemical <strong>co</strong>mposition <strong>and</strong> energy <strong>co</strong>ncentration ofDGS <strong>and</strong> DDGS from different grains are presented inTable 3. Distillers grain with solubles is high in CP, with<strong>co</strong>nsiderable variation between the different types of grainused in the production process. The highest average CP<strong>co</strong>ntent, 370 g/kg DM, w<strong>as</strong> reported for DDGS producedfrom a mix of 90 percent wheat <strong>and</strong> 10 percent barley(Franke, Meyer <strong>and</strong> Flachowsky, 2009; Los<strong>and</strong> et al., 2009;Meyer et al., 2010). Mustafa, McKinnon <strong>and</strong> Christensen(2000) reported that the ruminal escape of CP w<strong>as</strong> lowerfor wheat- than barley-b<strong>as</strong>ed DGS (490 versus 415 g/kgCP). Generally, distillers grain h<strong>as</strong> a relatively high fibre <strong>co</strong>ncentration,with highest cell-wall (neutral-detergent fibre –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!