Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Co-products from biofuel production for farm animals – an EU perspective 225Losand, B., Preissinger, W., Spiekers, H., Urdl, M. & Gruber,L. 2009. Bestimmung der Verdaulichkeit der Rohnährstoffeund des Energiegehaltes von Getreidetrockenschlempe ausWeizen und Weizen-Gerste-Gemischen. Züchtungskunde,81: 173–179.Maercker, M. 1908. Handbuch der Spiritusfabrikation. M.Delbruek, ed. Berlin, Germany.Martinez Amezuca, C., Parsons, C.M. & Noll, S.L. 2004.Content and relative bioavailability of phosphorus indistillers dried grains with solubles in chicks. Poultry Science,83: 971–976.Meyer, U., Schwabe, A., Dänicke, S. & Flachowsky, G.2010. Effects of co-products from biofuel production onthe performance of growing fattening bulls. Animal FeedScience and Technology, 161: 132–139.Menke, K.H. & Huss, W. 1987. Tierernährung undFuttermittelkunde. 3rd ed. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.Mir, Z., MacLeod, G.K., Buchanan-Smith, J.G., Grieve, D.G.& Grovum, W.L. 1984. Methods for protecting soybeanand canola proteins from degradation in the rumen.Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 64: 853–865.Mosier, A.R., Crutzen, P.J., Smith, K.A. & Winiwarter, W.2009. Nitrous oxide’s impact on net greenhouse gas savingsfrom biofuels: life-cycle analysis comparisons. InternationalJournal of Biotechnology, 11: 60–74.Moss, A.R. & Givens, D.I. 1994. The chemical composition,digestibility, metabolizable energy content and nitrogendegradability of some protein concentrates. Animal FeedScience and Technology, 47: 335–351.Mustafa, A.F., McKinnon, J.J. & Christensen, D.A. 2000.Chemical characterization and in situ nutrient degradabilityof wet distillers’ grains derived from barley-based ethanolproduction. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 83: 301–311.Mustafa, A.F., McKinnon, J.J., Thacker, P.A. & Christensen,D.A. 1997. Effect of borage meal on nutrient digestibilityand performance of ruminants and pigs. Animal FeedScience and Technology, 64: 273–285.Naesi, M. 1985. Distillers feeds from various grains as proteinsources for pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland,57: 255–262.Nehring, K. 1949. Lehrbuch der Tierernährung undFuttermittelkunde. 8 ed. (1963). Neumann Verlag, Radebeuland Berlin, Germany.Noblet, J., Cozannet, P. & Skiba, F. 2012. Nutritional valueand utilization of wheat dried distillers grain with solubles inpigs and poultry. pp. 163–175, this volume.Paggi, R.A., Fay, J.P. & Fernandez, H.M. 1999. Effect ofshort-chain fatty acids and glycerol on the proteolyticactivity of rumen fluid. Animal Feed Science and Technology,78: 341–347.Patience, J.F., Leterme, P., Beaulieu, A.D. & Zijlstra, R.T.2007. Utilization in swine diets of distillers dried grainsderived from corn or wheat used in ethanol production.pp. 89–102, in: J. Doppenberg and P. van der Aar (editors).Biofoels: implications for the feed industry. WageningenAcademic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Pedersen, C., Boersma, M.G. & Stein, H.H. 2007. Digestibilityof energy and phosphorus in ten samples of distillers driedgrains with solubles fed to growing pigs. Journal of AnimalScience, 85: 1168–1176.Peter, W. & Dänicke, S. 2003. Untersuchungen zumRapskucheneinsatz in der Fütterung langsam wachsender“Label”-Broiler. Archiv fur Geflügelkunde, 67: 253–260.Pinkney, J. 2009. Biofuels and the animal feed sector: Howbio-refining crops can make better use of land to meet ourneeds for feed and low carbon biofuels. pp. 235–289, in:P.C. Garnsworthy and J. Wiseman (editors). Recent advancesin animal nutrition – 2008. Nottingham University Press,Nottingham, UK.Preißinger, W., Spiekers, H. & Obermaier, A. 2009. Einsatzvon getrockneter Weizenschlempe in der Fresseraufzucht.9 p. Available at http://www.lfl.bayern.de/ite/rind/14695/linkurl_0_13.pdf Accessed 8 November 2011.Punz, C., Windisch, W. & Schedle, K. 2010. Einflussvon Trockenschlempe (DDGS) in Kombination mit NSPabbauendenEnzymen auf die Mast- und Schlachtleistungcon Schweinen. pp. 99–105, in: Proceedings of the 9th BOKUSymposium Tierernährung,15 April 2010, Vienna, Austria.RFA [Renewable Fuels Agency]. 2011. Carbon andsustainability reporting within the renewable transport fuelobligation, technical guidance, part 2. (Online) May 2011.Available at http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/carbonand-sustainability-technical-guidance/carbon-reportingtech-guidance-year-4-pt-two.pdfAccessed 14 January 2012.Richter, G., Hagemann, L., Alert, H.-J., Weber, M., Otto,F. & Chudaske, C. 2006a. Einsatz von Trockenschlempeauf Weizenbasis aus der Bio-ethanolherstellung bei Ferkelnund Mastschweinen. pp. 150–151, in: Proceedings of the9th Tagung Schweine- und Geflügelernährung, Halle/Saale,Germany.Richter, G., Hartung, H., Herzog, E. & Otto, F. 2006b.Einsatz von Trockenschlempe auf Weizenbasis aus derBio-ethanolherstellung bei Geflügel. pp. 265–267,in: Proceedings of the 9th Tagung Schweine- undGeflügelernährung, Halle/Saale, Germany.Richter, G., Lemser, A., Bargholz, J. & Carlson, H.1996. Prüfung der Einsatzwürdigkeit von Rapssaat undRapsextraktionsschrot in der Broilermast. Wirtschaftseig.Futter, 42: 52–56.Roger, V., Fonty, G., Andre, C. & Gouet, P. 1992. Effects ofglycerol on the growth, adhesion, and cellulolytic activityof rumen cellulolytic bacteria and anaerobic fungi. CurrentMicrobioloby, 25: 197–201.Rooke, J.A., Brookes, I.M. & Armstrong, D.G. 1983. Thedigestion of untreated and formaldehyde-treated soya-bean
226Biofuel co-products as livestock feed – Opportunities and challengesand rapeseed meals by cattle fed a basal silage diet. Journalof Agricultural Science, 100: 329–342.Sauer, F.D., Erfle, J.D. & Fisher, L.J. 1973. Propylene glycoland glycerol as a feed additive for lactating dairy cows:An evaluation of blood metabolite parameters. CanadianJournal of Animal Science, 53: 265–271.Schedle, K., Mair, M. & Windisch, W. 2010. ExperimentelleUntersuchungen zur Wirkung von Weizentrockenschlempeauf die Mast- und Schlachtleistung, Trockenmasse undAmmoniak im Colonchymus sowei Harnstoff im Blutplasmabei Mastschweinen. Züchtungskunde, 82: 303–315.Schingoethe, D.J., Kalscheur, K.F., Hippen. A.R. & Garcia,A.D. 2009. Invited review: The use of distillers products indairy cattle diets. Journal of Dairy Science, 92: 5802–5813.Schröder, A. & Südekum, K.-H. 1999. Glycerol as aco-product of biodiesel production in diets for ruminants.Paper No. 241, in: N. Wratten and P.A. Salisbury (editors).New Horizons for an Old Crop. Proceedings of the 10thInternational Rapeseed Congress. The Regional Institute Ltd,Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.Schröder, A. & Südekum, K.-H. 2002. Effekte von Glycerinunterschiedlicher Reinheit auf die Pansenfermentationund Nährstoffverdaulichkeiten bei Rinder. UFOP-Schriften,17: 51–67.Shurson, G.C., Zijlstra, R.T., Kerr, B.J. & Stein, H.H. 2102.Feeding biofuels co-products to pigs. pp. 175–207, thisvolume.Sørensen, H. 1990. Glucosinolates: structure-propertiesfunction.pp. 149–172, in: F. Shahidi (editor). Canola andrapeseed. Production, chemistry, nutrition and processingtechnology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, N ew York, USA.Spiekers, H. & Südekum, K.-H. 2004[Online]. Einsatzvon 00-Rapsextraktionsschrot beim Wieder käuer. UFOP-Praxisinformation. Available at ttp://www.ufop.de/downloads/RZ_Praxisinfo_Raps_100604.pdf Accessed 8November 2011.Stanford, K., McAllister, T.A., Xu Z.J., Pickard M. & Cheng,K.-J. 1995. Comparison of lignosulfonate-treated canolameal and soybean meal as rumen undegradable proteinsupplements for lambs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,75: 371–377.Stanford, K., McAllister, T.A., Lees, B.M., Xu Z.J. & Cheng,K.-J. 1996. Comparison of sweet white lupin seed, canolameal and soybean meal as protein supplements for lambs.Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 76: 215–219.Steingass, H., Kneer, G., Essig-Kozó, C. & Koch, C.2010. Aktuelle Untersuchungen zum Proteinwert vonRapsnebenprodukten und deren Einsatz in Rationen fürMilchkühe. pp. 177–184, in: Proceedings of the 19thInternational Science Symposium on Nutrition of DomesticAnimals ‘Zadravec-Erjavec Days’, Radenci, Slovenia.Südekum, K.-H. & Spiekers, H. 2002. Raps- undSojaextraktionsschrot neu bewertet/Re-evaluation ofrapeseed and soybean meal. Kraftfutter/Feed Magazine,85: 62–68.Südekum, K.-H., Nibbe, D., Lebzien, P., Steingaß, H. &Spiekers, H. 2003. Comparative evaluation of the proteinvalues of soybean and rapeseed meals by in vivo, in situ andlaboratory methods. pp. 1241–1243, in: Towards enhancedvalue of cruciferous oilseed crops by optimal productionand use of the high quality seed components. Proceedingsof the 11th International Rapeseed Congress, Copenhagen,Denmark.Südekum, K.-H., Schröder, A., Fiebelkorn, S., Schwer, R.& Thalmann, A. 2008. Quality characteristics of pelletedcompound feeds under varying storage conditions asinfluenced by purity and concentration of glycerol frombiodiesel production. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences,17: 120–136.The Royal Society. 2008. Sustainable biofuels: prospects andchallenges. Royal Society Publishing, London, UK.Trautwein, J., Chudaske C., Röser, W. & Dusel, G. 2008.Effect of distilled dried grains with solubles, with or withoutsupplementation of NSP-hydrolysing enzymes on broilerperformance. pp. 123–125, in: Proceedings of the 10thTagung Schweine- und Geflügelernährung, Halle/Saale,Germany.Tuori, M. 1992. Rapeseed meal as a supplementary proteinfor dairy cows on grass-silage-based diet, with the emphasison the Nordic AAT-PBV feed protein evaluation system.Agricultural Science in Finland, 1: 367–439.Universität Hohenheim – Dokumentationsstelle (editor).1997. DLG-Futterwerttabellen Wie der käuer. 7th Ed. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.Urdl, M., Gruber, L., Häusler, J., Maierhofer, G. & Schauer,A. 2006. Influence of distillers dried grains with solubles(Starprot) in dairy cow feeding. Slovak Journal of AnimalScience, 39: 43–50.Vanhatalo, A., Aronen, I. & Varvikko, T. 1995. Intestinalnitrogen digestibility of heat-moisture treated rapeseedmeals as assessed by the mobile-bag method in cows.Animal Feed Science and Technology, 55: 139–152.Voigt, J., Piatkowski, B., Schönhusen, U., Kreienbring,F., Krawielitzki R. & Nagel, S. 1990. Studies on theevaluation of feed protein for ruminants. 1. Passage ofnitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows feddifferent protein and carbohydrate sources. Archives ofAnimal Nutrition, 40: 245–257.Weber. M. 2010. Rapsextraktionsschrot in derSchweinefütterung: Qualität und Futterakzeptanz.Schweinezucht aktuell, 36: 35–36.Weber, M., Schulze, U., Stenzel, P. & Grimmer, A.2011[Online]. Versuchsbericht – Einsatz von hohenAnteilen von Rapsextraktionsschrot in der Ferkelfütterung.Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Forsten und Gartenbau,Iden, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany. Available at http://
Page 1 and 2:
BIOFUEL CO-PRODUCTS AS LIVESTOCK FE
Page 3:
Recommended citationFAO. 2012. Biof
Page 6 and 7:
vco-products to swine - Feeding cru
Page 8 and 9:
viiCHAPTER 22Use of Pongamia glabra
Page 10 and 11:
ixPrefaceHumans are faced with majo
Page 13 and 14:
xiiCBMCBSCCDSCCKCDOCDSCFCFBCFRCGECI
Page 15 and 16:
xivHCHOHClHCNHisH-JPKMHMCHPDDGHPDDG
Page 17 and 18:
xviPPbPCVPDPEMPFADPhePJPKCPKEPKMPKO
Page 19 and 20:
xviiiWBPWCGFWDGWDGSWDGSHWPCWTWWWNSK
Page 21 and 22:
2Biofuel co-products as livestock f
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
10Biofuel co-products as livestock
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 54 and 55:
35Chapter 3Impact of United States
Page 56 and 57:
Impact of United States biofuels co
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 120 and 121:
101Chapter 6Hydrogen sulphide: synt
Page 122 and 123:
Hydrogen sulphide in cattle fed co-
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 174 and 175:
155Chapter 8Utilization of crude gl
Page 176 and 177:
Utilization of crude glycerin in be
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194: 174Biofuel co-products as livestock
Page 228 and 229: 209Chapter 11Co-products from biofu
Page 230 and 231: Co-products from biofuel production
Page 246: Co-products from biofuel production
Page 294 and 295:
275Chapter 15Sustainable and compet
Page 296 and 297:
Sustainable and competitive use of
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
291Chapter 16Scope for utilizing su
Page 312 and 313:
Scope for utilizing sugar cane baga
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
303Chapter 17Camelina sativa in pou
Page 324 and 325:
Camelina sativa in poultry diets: o
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
311Chapter 18Utilization of lipid c
Page 332 and 333:
Utilization of lipid co-products of
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 370 and 371:
351Chapter 21Use of detoxified jatr
Page 372 and 373:
Use of detoxified jatropha kernel m
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
379Chapter 22Use of Pongamia glabra
Page 400 and 401:
Use of Pongamia glabra (karanj) and
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
403Chapter 23Co-products of the Uni
Page 424 and 425:
Co-products of the United States bi
Page 426 and 427:
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 486 and 487:
467Chapter 26An assessment of the p
Page 488 and 489:
An assessment of the potential dema
Page 490 and 491:
Page 492 and 493:
Page 494 and 495:
Page 496 and 497:
Page 498 and 499:
Page 500 and 501:
Page 502 and 503:
483Chapter 27Biofuels: their co-pro
Page 504 and 505:
Biofuels: their co-products and wat
Page 506 and 507:
Page 508 and 509:
Page 510 and 511:
Page 512 and 513:
Page 514 and 515:
Page 516 and 517:
Page 518 and 519:
Page 520 and 521:
501Chapter 28Utilization of co-prod
Page 522 and 523:
Utilization of co-products of the b
Page 524 and 525:
Page 526 and 527:
Page 528 and 529:
Page 530 and 531:
Page 532 and 533:
Page 534 and 535:
Page 536 and 537:
Page 538 and 539:
Page 540 and 541:
Page 542 and 543:
523Contributing authorsSouheila Abb
Page 544 and 545:
Contributing authors 525for the Fee
Page 546 and 547:
Contributing authors 527Friederike
Page 548 and 549:
Contributing authors 529Sustainable
Page 550 and 551:
Contributing authors 531During the
Page 552:
Contributing authors 533(Hons.) and
show all

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?