12.07.2015 Views

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68<strong>Biofuel</strong> <strong>co</strong>-<strong>products</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>livestock</strong> <strong>feed</strong> – <strong>Opportunities</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>challenges</strong>processed maize (Zinn, Owens <strong>and</strong> Ware, 2002). A practical<strong>co</strong>ncern for <strong>feed</strong>lot nutritionists is whether replacing SFCwith DG affects the NE value of the diet <strong>and</strong> ultimatelyanimal performance. As noted previously, with diets b<strong>as</strong>edon minimally processed grain, positive effects of adding DGhave been reported for <strong>feed</strong>lot ADG <strong>and</strong> G:F. For example,in a summary of 9 experiments with DRC or high-moisturemaize (HMC) <strong>as</strong> the grain source, G:F responded quadratically<strong>as</strong> wet DG incre<strong>as</strong>ed in the diet, with a maximalresponse at 30 to 50 percent DG in the DM (Klopfenstein,Erickson <strong>and</strong> Bremer, 2008).As noted previously, our data with SFC diets (e.g.Figure 1) <strong>and</strong> other reports in the literature lend credenceto the idea that the <strong>feed</strong>ing value of DG differs dependingon the b<strong>as</strong>al grain processing method. May et al.(2007) detected an interaction between maize processingmethod <strong>and</strong> inclusion level of sorghum DG (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!