12.07.2015 Views

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

Biofuel co-products as livestock feed - Opportunities and challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S<strong>co</strong>pe for utilizing sugar cane bag<strong>as</strong>se <strong>as</strong> <strong>livestock</strong> <strong>feed</strong> – an Asian perspective 297TABLE 4Summary of reported responses in different categories of <strong>livestock</strong> fed untreated or processed bag<strong>as</strong>seTreatment Species <strong>and</strong> response Remarks ReferenceUntreated bag<strong>as</strong>se/pithBag<strong>as</strong>se with mol<strong>as</strong>ses mixture at10, 20 <strong>and</strong> 30% replacing maizeUntreated bag<strong>as</strong>se (UB)Complete <strong>feed</strong>s(i) 30% Untreated bag<strong>as</strong>se + 70%un<strong>co</strong>nventional <strong>co</strong>ncentrates(ii) 30% wheat straw + 70%<strong>co</strong>ncentrateComplete <strong>feed</strong>s(i) 40% wheat straw + 60%<strong>co</strong>ncentrate(ii) 40% untreated bag<strong>as</strong>se + 60%<strong>co</strong>ncentratePigs (local <strong>and</strong> exotic breeds)Bulls fed <strong>co</strong>mplete <strong>feed</strong> blocks<strong>co</strong>ntaining 40% wheat straw or UBCrossbred calves fed for 40 weeks.DMI <strong>and</strong> ADG were <strong>co</strong>mparable inboth groupsCrossbred calves fed for 4 monthsADG, DMI <strong>and</strong> FCR were significantlylower in pigs given 30% mixture.Rumen fermentation in sugar canebag<strong>as</strong>se fed diet w<strong>as</strong> <strong>co</strong>mparable towheat straw b<strong>as</strong>ed dietComplete <strong>feed</strong> with 30% sugar canebag<strong>as</strong>se <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>co</strong>nventional <strong>feed</strong>sw<strong>as</strong> e<strong>co</strong>nomicalDMI, ADG <strong>and</strong> FCR were <strong>co</strong>mparablebetween the groups, with bag<strong>as</strong>sediets being e<strong>co</strong>nomicalReddy et al., 1985.Hozhabri <strong>and</strong> Singhal,2006.P<strong>and</strong>ya et al., 2009.Fardin <strong>and</strong> Singhal,2009.Steam treated bag<strong>as</strong>se <strong>and</strong> pithSteam pressure treated bag<strong>as</strong>seSteaming of bag<strong>as</strong>se at 170–195 °Cfor 60 minutes.+ NaOH addition @ 5% on DMb<strong>as</strong>isSteam treated bag<strong>as</strong>sesupplemented with legumes, ureamol<strong>as</strong>ses, rice bran <strong>and</strong> poultrylitterSteam treatment of bag<strong>as</strong>sefollowed by anhydrous ammoniatreatment (3% by weight) for 15days, plus supplements.Steam treated pith (STP)Milch <strong>co</strong>ws fed for 28 days, replacing18–32% in <strong>co</strong>mplete dietsImproved the DM digestibility from27–30% to 52% in sheepFurther improved the digestibility to65–66% in sheepCrossbred bulls fed for141 daysCrossbred bulls fed for169 daysArabi lambs fed for 70 days. STP<strong>co</strong>nstituted 0, 11, 22 <strong>and</strong> 33% of diet<strong>and</strong> replaced barley at 0, 25, 50 <strong>and</strong>75%, respectivelyGreatly depressed DMI, milk yield <strong>and</strong> Horn et al., 1984.milk fat <strong>co</strong>ntentPalatability w<strong>as</strong> impaired Ali, 1991.Steam-treated bag<strong>as</strong>se w<strong>as</strong> well<strong>co</strong>nsumed <strong>and</strong> ADG varied from 0.57to 0.75 kgADG in bulls fed steam treatedbag<strong>as</strong>se (0.64 to 0.54 g) w<strong>as</strong>significantly higher than the steamammoniatreated bag<strong>as</strong>se (0.30 g)DMI <strong>and</strong> ADG did not differ. FCR w<strong>as</strong>significantly lower at 33% of STP.STP at 11% level had the beste<strong>co</strong>nomic efficiencyHéctor, 1990.Héctor, 1990.Ensiyeh, Najafgholi<strong>and</strong> Hamideh, 2009.Chemical treatments(i) Complete diets <strong>co</strong>ntaining 40%alkali treated (2% NaOH) bag<strong>as</strong>se(ATB)(ii) Complete diets <strong>co</strong>ntaining 40%untreated bag<strong>as</strong>se (UB)(iii) Control: p<strong>as</strong>ture + <strong>co</strong>ncentrates@ 360 g/liter milk(i) urea-mol<strong>as</strong>ses enriched sugarcane bag<strong>as</strong>se(ii) (i) with alkali treatment(iii) 4 kg green + paddy strawUntreated <strong>and</strong> alkali-treated (5%NaOH solution) bag<strong>as</strong>seSteam <strong>and</strong> alkali treated bag<strong>as</strong>se(ATB)(i) Spray drying of fresh bag<strong>as</strong>sewith NaOH solution (30%)<strong>co</strong>ntaining 5% NaOH of dry fibre(TAB).(ii) Supplementation of (i) withmol<strong>as</strong>ses (20: 40 w:w) <strong>and</strong> urea (1.5to 2.0%)(iii) supplementation of (ii) with<strong>co</strong>tton seedRaw bag<strong>as</strong>se pith (RBP) <strong>and</strong> ureaammoniated bag<strong>as</strong>se pith (UABP)(4% urea, 40% moisture <strong>and</strong> 21days treatment)Lactating <strong>co</strong>ws fed for 300 daysFeed <strong>co</strong>nsumption- (i) 16.5 kg, (ii)14.2 kg <strong>and</strong> (iii) 6 kg <strong>co</strong>ncentrate +p<strong>as</strong>ture.Milk production kg – (i) 17.2 (ii) 12.5<strong>and</strong> (iii) 16.5Crossbred heifers fed for 61 daysAll three roughages were fed adlibitum with 2 kg <strong>co</strong>ncentrateAw<strong>as</strong>si lambs25, 40 <strong>and</strong> 50% untreated <strong>and</strong> alkalitreatedbag<strong>as</strong>seDohne Merino lambs fed to appetitefor 56 days.ATB improved ADG <strong>and</strong> FCR at 19 <strong>and</strong>40% inclusion levels.Incre<strong>as</strong>ed IVDMD from 30 to 55%Maintained weaner cattleDaily gain up to 0.7 kg in growingcattleCrossbred bulls fed for 28 daysComplete <strong>feed</strong>s having 50 : 50roughage <strong>and</strong> <strong>co</strong>ncentrateUB resulted in significant drop in milkproduction.ATB w<strong>as</strong> <strong>co</strong>mparable to <strong>co</strong>ntrols inmilk production but it resulted insignificant drop in milk fat <strong>and</strong> totalsolids %ADG g (i) 158 (ii) 55 & (iii) 356Urea-mol<strong>as</strong>ses enriched bag<strong>as</strong>se,without or with alkali treatment w<strong>as</strong>not suitable <strong>as</strong> the only source ofroughage.Treatment had no significant effect onADG <strong>and</strong> FCRNaOH treatment appeared mainlyto incre<strong>as</strong>e its palatability leading tohigher ADGSteam treatment improvedperformance at lower inclusionlevel, while at higher levels it had anegative effect.TAB can be stored up to 6 monthswithout problem.No health problems <strong>as</strong>sociated withthe <strong>feed</strong>ing TAB-b<strong>as</strong>ed diets providedthe <strong>co</strong>ncentration of NaOH does notexceed 5% on dry fibre.RBP w<strong>as</strong> inferior to wheat straw <strong>and</strong>UABP w<strong>as</strong> superior to wheat strawb<strong>as</strong>ed dietsR<strong>and</strong>el et al., 1972.Reddy, Mohan <strong>and</strong>D<strong>as</strong>, 1981.Al-Taw<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong>Alw<strong>as</strong>h, 1983.Ja<strong>co</strong>bs <strong>and</strong> vanNiekerk, 1985.Tudor <strong>and</strong> Inkerman,1989.Singh et al., 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!