18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

Doncaster PCT has created a model which can be used to produce the estimated<br />

number of people with diagnosed learning disabilities (Doncaster PCT 2008). In general<br />

when such models have been produced, the model is based on research undertaken<br />

elsewhere in the UK examining the prevalence of diagnosed disease in the community,<br />

which has then been modelled and applied to different populations such as those living<br />

in a particular PCT area. Therefore, the accuracy of the estimates depends on the<br />

quality of the initial research and the modelling itself. If the original research did not<br />

include very deprived areas, it is very difficult to generalise and apply the model to very<br />

deprived areas like Hull. Furthermore, there are many reasons why the prevalence<br />

could differ among practices (see section 12.13 on page 782 for more information).<br />

Further information about problems associated with models can be found in the<br />

Association of Public Health Observatories Technical Briefing (Association of Public<br />

Health Observatories 2011) and in section 12.1 on page 770. Further information<br />

about problems associated with models can be found in the Association of Public Health<br />

Observatories Technical Briefing (Association of Public Health Observatories 2011) and<br />

in section 12.1 on page 770. Therefore, just because practices have a particularly low<br />

prevalence or a relatively large difference between the registers and the model, it does<br />

not necessarily mean that they are performing badly in any way relative to other general<br />

practices. Nevertheless, a comparison of the differences between the modelled<br />

prevalence and the practice list registers can act as a starting point for investigation.<br />

Practices with a low prevalence or a relatively large difference between the model and<br />

the register estimates can be examined further and considered in relation to patient<br />

characteristics using local knowledge. Differences might just reflect that the model is<br />

not a very good fit for Hull. For reference, the mean age of practice patients (Table 28)<br />

and mean deprivation scores (Table 49) for each practice may be examined.<br />

The results of the modelling and the actual diagnosed numbers of patients with learning<br />

disabilities are given in Table 62. The model does not necessarily represent the actual<br />

number of people who should be diagnosed with learning disabilities for each practice; it<br />

is only a guide. The characteristics of each practice differ and need to be considered.<br />

The age-specific prevalence estimates for learning disabilities used by Doncaster PCT<br />

are derived from research undertaken by Emerson and Hatton and they state that it is<br />

an estimate of "true prevalence" defined as "people with severe learning disabilities who<br />

would be known to services and people with less severe learning disabilities who<br />

probably would not be known to services" (Emerson and Hatton 2004). Therefore, the<br />

model estimates are considerably higher than the numbers on the practice registers as<br />

the model includes those people with less severe learning disabilities who they expect<br />

would not be known to services. Whilst clinical definitions may exist as to what<br />

constitutes mild or moderate learning disabilities, in practice it may be difficult to<br />

ascertain, and different definitions and how learning disabilities is defined could change<br />

the estimates considerably, for example, including or not including “mild” learning<br />

disabilities may influence the estimates considerably. Despite this potential problem<br />

with definitions, the estimates used by Doncaster PCT are reasonably similar to those<br />

given in Table 61. Assuming that two-fifteenths of those aged 5-19 years with learning<br />

disabilities are aged 18-19 years, then it is estimated that 5,601 people who are<br />

estimated to have learning disabilities are aged 18+ years from Table 61 which is not<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!