18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

been measured previously six years earlier in year R during the 2001/2002 school year).<br />

The results of this analysis is presented below. It is intended that this analysis is repeated<br />

using the latest data once the data becomes available 35 .<br />

There were 6,062 children on the Child Health System in year R for 2001/2002 who<br />

were matched to their record on the Child Health System at year 6 for 2007/2008.<br />

However, not all these children had their height and weight measured on both occasions<br />

with approximately 72% having measurements at both ages. Overall, there were 4,348<br />

Hull children with height and weight measured at both year R and year 6. The BMI<br />

weight classifications using Table 410 were used to define underweight, desirable<br />

weight, overweight and obesity.<br />

The Child Health System should include a record for every single child registered with a<br />

General Practitioner within the Hull or East Riding of Yorkshire area. Therefore, in most<br />

cases, if there was no record within the file for a child, it is very likely that the child was<br />

not registered with a GP within the area at one of the ages but was registered with a<br />

local GP at the other age, i.e. because they had moved out of the area or moved into the<br />

area between the ages of 4–5 and 10–11 years. This would result in unmatched<br />

records.<br />

The children with height or weight not recorded could have been away from school on<br />

the day the measurements were taken or not measured for some other reason, for<br />

example, the parents requested that their child was not measured.<br />

Table 118 and Table 119 give the number of boys and girls respectively by BMI category<br />

at year R and year 6. Any estimate of prevalence at these two ages should be treated with<br />

caution as they do not include all those children measured only those who had<br />

measurements taken at both time periods (for overall prevalence see Table 113 and<br />

Table 116). This same information is displayed graphically in Figure 99 and Figure 100.<br />

From this information, it is evident that the majority of children are within the „desirable<br />

weight‟ category at both years R and 6.<br />

35 The intention is to repeat the analysis for year 6 children measured over five years between 2005/2006<br />

and 2009/2010 who were previously measured six years earlier in year R between 1999/2000 and<br />

2003/2004. However, the original Child Health System database is no longer used and the original database<br />

has been migrated to another system (SystemOne). The original child identifier was not transfers, and<br />

another unique child identifier was transferred instead (NHS number). The existing data held by Public Health<br />

Sciences included the old identifier which means that it is not possible to link records from the same children<br />

over time. Therefore, it is necessary that the entire dataset (from 1999/2000) is (re-)obtained (which contains<br />

the new identifier). The request for this data has been made, but the data has not yet been obtained.<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 288

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!